Public forum vs. publisher
❝❝A public forum is mostly open to anyone who would speak and write, but the owners and operators of the forum can't be held responsible for what others write and say.
A publisher selects content and is responsible for what is written and said.
The First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution does not apply to private entities or individuals.
Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act is a decent compromise. If I am a publisher or broadcaster or webmaster, I'm under no obligation to provide a place for your thoughts and opinions. My choice controls the content. But that makes me responsible for the content.
If I don't provide the content, then I don't have liability.
The more moderation I provide, the more liability.
The job of social media is to provide access while people make up their own minds.❞❞— Adapted from public forum vs. publisher in NeoWayland's lexicon
“PragerU v. YouTube”
Are you trying to make me irritated with you?
You keep going off on these anti-pagan rants.
Read More...“Soph BANNED: The Youtuber They Don’t Want You To See”
“Soph, also known as LtCorbis, is a 14 year old girl whose YouTube videos, dealing with issues like LGBT and gay pride, Islam, and pedophilia, have drawn the ire and leftist Buzzfeed reporters everywhere. Recently banned from YouTube but still active on BitChute, we explore her videos, and whether minors like her have simply been indoctrinated, and should be free to post content they may regret later on.”
Read More...Appropriate response to social justice concerns
““You have “issues” with the Gadsden Flag? Go fuck yourself.
You have “issues” with the Betsy Ross flag? Go fuck yourself.
You have “issues” with my “Come and Take It” shirt? Go fuck yourself.
I could go on. But you get the idea.
Perhaps you consider this intemperate and confrontational. I agree! It is intemperate and confrontational by intent. Just like the Gadsden Flag.””— Craig Pirrong, Have “Issues” With the Gadsden Flag?: GFY
NeoNote — The internet and social media
❝❝Private property.NeoNotes are the selected comments that I made on other boards, in email, or in response to articles where I could not respond directly.
Take me for example. I pay for the domain name registration and the web hosting on my sites. I choose what I put there. I am no more required to give someone else access than I am required to let that someone else sell used cars off my patio or erect a Decalogue monument on my front lawn.
Having said that, if your company advertises and has built it's services on allowing people to speak or write their mind, it's hypocritical to allow one viewpoint without others provided no one advocates harming others, taking or destroying property, or breaking the law.
Private property still applies.
They can't do it in my place and I can't do it in theirs.
The road is a commons. The shopping mall isn't. The portals to the internet are provided by your ISP, not the social media.
Social media is something you choose to use. As the old saying goes, if you are not paying for the product, you are the product. Or at least your data and your access to the "cool sites" is.❞❞
Women's rights
❝❝The first and most important "women's right" is the right to vote. Then comes the right to earn, to keep what is earned, and to hold property. Free speech and the rest listed in the Bill of Rights come next. Reproductive "rights" don't even make the top ten. Especially since the last time I checked, sex is supposed to be a consensual activity.❞❞— NeoWayland, comments from The “no news is good news” open thread
Language
❝❝Just to point out the obvious, previously language changed without being mandated or legally sanctioned or morally correct. It worked because people used it and decided that it worked.❞❞
“Preferred Pronouns or Prison”
““He.” “She.” “They.” Have you ever given a moment’s thought to your everyday use of these pronouns? It has probably never occurred to you that those words could be misused. Or that doing so could cost you your business or your job – or even your freedom. Journalist Abigail Shrier explains how this happened and why it's become a major free speech issue.”
Read More...“The EU Just Destroyed The Internet #Article11 #Article13”
Signs of liberal privilege
Excerpted from Seven Signs of Liberal Privilege by Timothy Daughtry.
- Assuming that you have the right to control what everyone else does, what they have, what they say, and how they think.
- Assuming that you have the right never to hear any opinion that contradicts your own, and using intimidation and violence if necessary to protect your ideological bubble.
- Assuming that feeling offended on your part constitutes a political crisis on the nation’s part.
- Having exquisite sensitivity to the moral speck in society’s eye while ignoring the beam in your own.
- Consistency is for other people.
- You must be judged only by your rhetoric and not by your results.
- And finally, liberal privilege means never having to say “not guilty.”
“Facebook Insider Leaks Docs; Explains "Deboosting" "Troll Report" & Political Targeting in Interview”
❝The 3 Rules of Hate Speech: Free Speech Rules (Episode 2)❞
So much for freedom of speech
❝The Truth - Nathan Philips / Covington Catholic Kids❞
“I normally avoid these sort of topics, but after seeing all this footage and all the people trying to destroy these kids lives, I felt like I had to do something.
We all need to do better, stop with this mob mentality over the first thing we see. Remember there's always two sides to a coin.”
Read More...Oversized headline catchup
Mark Penn: FBI Trump-Russia investigation shows deep state was worse than we thought
The Shutdown Is Providing Evidence Of Private Businesses Making Government Obsolete
The shutdown’s real lesson: Government has taken hostage too much of the economy
Political Nightmares Multiply for Europe Ahead of Davos
Feds Can't Force You To Unlock Your iPhone With Finger Or Face, Judge Rules
The Game of Pseudo-Authenticity
Supreme Court to Consider Whether Police Can Order Blood Draws from Unconscious Drivers
Public Disdain For Russia Probe Intensifies, Trump Approval Climbs — IBD/TIPP Poll
Trump's Terrible Record on Property Rights
“The President's recent threat to use "the military version of eminent domain" to seize property for his border wall is just the tip of a larger iceberg of policies and legal positions inimical to constitutional property rights.”California prohibits gender-based auto insurance: report
Ladies, expect your rates to go upDemocrats Failing to Control Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s Green Revolution
If Republicans were smart, they'd keep quiet while the Democrats self-destructSecond Thoughts On Pot
Dems fly to Puerto Rico on chartered jet, meet with lobbyists, see 'Hamilton' as shutdown drags on
Just the Hispanic Caucus.US approved thousands of child bride requests
Oh My: Catholic Archdioceses Admit Wuerl Knew Of McCarrick Abuse Allegation In 2004
Philly residents defy the city’s controversial ‘soda tax’
Inside Facebook’s ‘cult-like’ workplace, where dissent is discouraged and employees pretend to be happy all the time
5 Things To Do About Our Culture’s Antagonism Against Men
Gab Promotes Bitcoin as 'Free Speech Money' to Over 850,000 Users
The Recession Will Be Unevenly Distributed
“Those households, enterprises and organizations that have no debt, a very low cost basis and a highly flexible, adaptable structure will survive and even prosper.”How Facebook Borrows From the NSA Playbook
5 reasons why there’s still no end to the shutdown
“They can’t end the standoff because Democrats and Republicans are trying to solve different problems”The only acceptable answer: “None of your f(ornicating) business!”
Who gave National Review the power to excommunicate?
Employee at Ford Office Fired After Disagreeing With Transgender Post
Majority Preservation Act
“The first House Democratic bill aims to hamstring opponents.”Nobel secretary regrets Obama peace prize
This Reporter Took a Deep Look Into the Science of Smoking Pot. What He Found Is Scary.
Carriers Swore They'd Stop Selling Location Data. Will They Ever?
Cory Doctorow: Disruption for Thee, But Not for Me
NeoNotes — Looking good
❝❝Unscientific test.
Two video monitors of equal size. A dozen people, some of who were Democrats. Both videos played side by side with the volume turned down. All but one person thought that Trump came across stronger, more confident, better body language, and more convincingly. One guy said that Pelosi and Schumer looked like high school student council candidates.
Again, I don't like Trump and I don't trust Trump. But compared to the Democrat leadership, well, there's no comparison.
Is anyone else reminded of the Kennedy-Nixon debate?❞❞
❝❝Kennedy vs. Nixon.NeoNotes are the selected comments that I made on other boards, in email, or in response to articles where I could not respond directly.
Regardless of what was said, visually Trump came across looking very well. Pelosi and Schumer came across looking like two high schoolers running for student council. That observation isn't mine, but I am caging it anyway. Why in the World were they sharing a lectern?
Trump came across as an executive with pictures of his loved ones in the background. And with only one American flag. Pelosi and Schumer looked like they got kicked out of the cafeteria and they dragged in flags to make the walls look good.
As an aside, the trend of using multiple flags behind you to show your patriotism is stupid.
Kennedy vs. Nixon.
If you'll remember, I told you before you need to focus on the things that Trump does that are actually wrong. I specifically mentioned his misuse of eminent domain in the past. Lo and behold, the key part of his emergency plan is eminent domain.
Peepers, you focus on the wrong things when you attack Trump. You have from the very first. And you continually mistake my not agreeing with you as support of Trump.
Trump has been making Democrats look bad since he announced. It doesn't help when Democrats continually underestimate him. Even if they ignore everything that Trump did before, there's not a one of the Democrat Congressional leadership who has ever negotiated anything outside government. Trump is playing this exactly right and the optics reflect that.
You want to take Trump down? I'll tell you what to focus on. Eminent domain. The volatility of the stock market. Not the direction, but how fast and how far it changes direction. There's some major instability there. His treatment of the EU, particularly downgrading the ambassador. National security, particularly spying on Americans. Healthcare. War on drugs. Prescription drugs and self medication. The Second Amendment. Social Security and pensions. The national debt. Military spending and accountability. Free speech. Protectionism. Start with those.
You can't treat him as a Republican politico because he isn't one. And don't forget that this man has been dragging his fights and negotiations through the press for forty years. Remember that exchange from the first Pirates of the Caribbean movie about the worst pirate. Trump doesn't care if the press is good or bad, he just wants the press.
This came from an unscientific experiment that some friends and I did. And yes, some of them were Democrats. We ran the videos side by side on two monitors with the sound turned off.
Trump looked like he belonged. Pelosi and Schumer didn't. Their body language showed that they were unhappy, probably because they were sharing a lectern and neither wanted to share the spotlight. Pay attention to their hands specifically. Trump looked friendly, Pelosi and Schumer looked like they wanted to strangle someone.
I never have liked the multiple American flag thing, not even when it started with Bush League. I think it was him, he was the one I noticed using it first. Certainly the Democrats of that time were doing it. I think it is purposely distracting. Come to think of it, that's when I remember multiple Democrats sharing a lectern. Or at least all standing behind one person at the lectern.
As for the Z group, I adjusted my tactics accordingly. They wanted to ignore the political implications when those same implications were central to the argument, whether they wished to acknowledge that or not.
You on the other hand don't like to deal when facts or actions don't fit your script. You think that opposing someone means throwing every insult and accusation possible at them in the hope that something sticks. You're not willing to look the person's history and adjust accordingly. You let the labels control your expectations and then get frustrated when things don't turn out the way you want.
I was never against criticizing Trump. I was against criticizing Trumpstupidlyfoolishly in ways that would make him look stronger and better. Throwing insults at him doesn't work, he just pushes back. Treating him as the typical Republican politico who will back down out of civility or for the greater good doesn't work because that is not what he does.
It's not that I support Trump. I just think you are attacking him in very stupid and amazingly ineffective ways.❞❞
Oversized year change roundup
Union Scum: Seasonal UPS Workers Had Paychecks Taken By Local Teamsters Chapter In Boston
Firm Who Warned America of ‘Russian Meddling’ Caught Running Fake Russia Bot Campaign
Liberal Donor Apologizes For Funding Group That Falsely Claimed Russians Supported Roy Moore In Alabama Senate Race
New Studies Show Pundits Are Wrong About Russian Social-Media Involvement in US Politics
Imagine if We Paid for Food like We Do Healthcare
How Should Facebook (and Twitter, and YouTube, and...) Decide What Speech To Allow?
The angry lawyer who went on a racist rant that went viral got kicked out of his office space — and his week is only getting worse
Angela Merkel: Nation States Must "Give Up Sovereignty" To New World Order
A year after net-neutrality’s repeal, the Internet is alive and well — and faster than ever
A Holiday Mystery: Why Did John Roberts Intervene in the Mueller Probe?
NY police say 'Muslim Community Patrol' car not sanctioned by them
New Documents Suggest The Steele Dossier Was A Deliberate Setup For Trump
Yellow Vests Becoming World Wide Movement
France: Year's 1st yellow vest event brings tear gas, fires
Eminent Domain: The Wall’s Other Problem
Must Writers Be Moral? Their Contracts May Require It
The New Congress and the Rolling Catastrophe of the US Body Politic
Fact check: What's a 'national emergency,' and can Trump declare one to get his wall?
Movies for Libertarians: Little Pink House
House Lawmakers Prepare Rollout Of Gun Control Proposal
Man Sells Junk Guns To Buy-Back Program, Buys New Gun With Cash
The Vaccination Debate
“Now—we have remarkable new information: a respected pro-vaccine medical expert used by the federal government to debunk the vaccine-autism link, says vaccines can cause autism after all. He claims he told that to government officials long ago, but they kept it secret.”How Medicare For All Could Become the Leading Cause of Death In America
Ginsburg missing Supreme Court arguments for 1st time
Airport Security Lines Grow Across The Nation As TSA Sickout Continues
“Journalism is…”
““Journalism is printing what someone else does not want printed: everything else is public relations.””— Lee Mcintyre, The Decline of Traditional Media
❝7 Things You Should Know About Free Speech in Schools: Free Speech Rules (Episode 1)❞
Thursday super roundup
NeoNote — There is no "Judeo-Christian faith."
Wednesday roundup
Bonus Sunday roundup
NeoNote — The Democrats aren't democratic
When they have eliminated superdelegates, they will have earned the designation.
Read More...Friday roundup
Batkid saved San Francisco five years ago, and his cancer's been in remission ever since
Read More...Thursday - November 15, 2018
Monday roundup
Pelosi On Broward County: ‘There Is No Election Fraud,’ Just ‘An Honest Count Of The Vote’
Arizona Democrat's Lead Now 'Insurmountable'
Eeny, Meeny, Miny, Moe
❝How Florida elections work—or don’t❞This is What Retail Investors Did with GE This Year as it Plunged
Google’s Highly Cited Scholar Wants a ‘Farewell to Free Speech’
Lhamon’s Confession: She Gamed The Narrative
God and Guns in the Synagogue
Understanding the Global Recession of 2019
Former Hillary Adviser: “Hillary will run again”
‘None of the above’ tops list of potential 2020 Dems, poll shows
Alabama Voters Pass Amendment to Display Ten Commandments at Public Schools
This won't end well. Why is it that certain monotheists define religious freedom as their religion above all others?Should We Abolish the Electoral College?
Judicial Watch sues for records on overlooked House IT scandal
“Platform Or Publisher?”
Platform Or Publisher? How Big Tech Can Be Brought To Its Knees
““Either way — platform or publisher — Big Tech loses, as long as the government forces it to one side or the other. If platform, then the FAAGs have to tolerate thought criminals using their services, just as if they were a common carrier, like a telephone utility. If publisher, then Big Tech can be sued to kingdom come and charged with innumerable violations of federal law.””
Who might be dangerous
““One of the Best Arguments Against Blocking Speech on Social Media....
...is so we become aware of who might be dangerous.””
— Robert Wenzel, One of the Best Arguments Against Blocking Speech on Social Media....
Oversized Monday roundup
Report: 3,000 SNAP Retailers Used Social Security Numbers of Dead People During Obama Administration
China Targets Control Over Internet of Things for Spying, Business
Once Again, NBC Sits On Story Related to Sexual Misconduct Until After It Matters
Corporate Speech Police Are Not the Answer to Online Hate
'#WalkAway' movement renouncing liberalism marches through nation's capital
One of the Best Arguments Against Blocking Speech on Social Media....
“...is so we become aware of who might be dangerous.”Defensible Space
““Megafires” are now a staple of life in the Pacific Northwest, but how we talk about them illustrates the tension at the heart of the western myth itself.”Deficits Do Matter: Debt Payments Will Consume Trillions of Dollars in Coming Years
U.S.-bound migrants enter Guatemala, others clash at border
Another 3000 strong caravanIs Orwell’s Big Brother Here? Bezos & Amazon Team up With Defense, CIA & ICE
Murder in Pittsburgh and the Targeting of Alternative Social Media
Voters in Oregon Have the Opportunity to Create 10 “Gun Sanctuary” Counties
New Hampshire Privacy Amendment on the Ballot
Google’s smart city dream is turning into a privacy nightmare
Mexico offers caravan migrants benefits to stay; thousands refuse
Virtue-signaling and derangement in the wake of a massacre
Friday roundup
Headlines that don't merit their own entry
Ecuador says Assange must sort out own issues with Britain
When Will Politicians Admit Social Security Is on a Collision Course with Math?
FBI: 'Pipe Bomb-Like' Devices Mailed To Prominent Dems Had 'Sulfur Substance,' Digital Clock, 'Harmless' White Powder
Not meant to explode. A hoax or a warning? I'm leaning towards hoax.What a bunch of idiots
““A few days ago the creator of the most famous consumer ‘credit score’ in the United States announced a major overhaul in how it rates borrowers.”Pentagon sends 800 troops to US-Mexico border as migrant caravan advances
The Feds Just Hit A Notorious Swatter With 46 New Charges. He Intends To Plead Guilty
Extending the Electric Vehicle Tax Credit Undermines Tax Reform
Criticizing a Drag Show Earned This Catholic College Student a Visit From the Title IX Coordinator
Their Ideology Is Envy And Their Policy Is Theft
Los Angeles Owes Billions in Pension Debts. Now It's Asking Citizens for Permission to Run a Bank.
Foxconn’s Predatory Reliance on Eminent Domain
European Court: Woman's Defamation of Muhammad Doesn't Count as Free Expression
CEI Expert Says EU Proposal to Ban Single-Use Consumer Plastic Items "Won't Help the Environment"
NeoNote — What happens when progressives are in charge?
Thursday roundup
“Big Brother Wants to Stop Your Private Online Conversations”
You are free
Censorship & corporate virtue signalling
Alex Jones is wrong almost all the time. He's not worth your time or mine. Infowars is not a good source.
Absolutely these companies have the right to decide who does and does not use their platform. It's their money after all.
But they are hypocrites when they declare that they support free speech while applying selective censorship. Especially if they allow the Islamist, the anti-semitic, the anti-conservative, the antifa, and the anti-white stuff to stay on their platforms.
That's the problem with hate speech. Somehow it's always about what the other guy said, never about what you said.
And all this still overlooks the obvious. If someone doesn't like what is in a podcast or a video, they don't have to pay attention.
Demanding it's removal for the greater good is the coward's way out. It means you don't trust someone to make their own choices. You want to meddle. You wouldn't stand for it if someone else did it to you.
People should choose for themselves. Corporations have lousy morals.
NeoNote — Demonizing the press
❝❝Pardon, but the media set the stage for their own demonization well before Trump's election. No, not everyone of them and not most of them. But the shift from news to liberal-opinon-passed-off-as-news has been going on for decades now. In the mission to present "THE truth," the media has forgotten that there is often more than one truth and that truth needs something more than passionate writing.NeoNotes are the selected comments that I made on other boards, in email, or in response to articles where I could not respond directly.
Anyone remember supply-side economics? The common narrative is that it was a product of the Reagan administration and that it was a catastrophic failure. But truth shows that Kennedy tried reducing taxes and regulations first. And under both Kennedy and Reagan, it boosted the economy. But that is not what the media says.
The common narrative is that people of faith demand that minorities be suppressed. Unless of course you are a minority person of faith who depends on government protection. But truth shows that Christians (yes, Christians) made American pluralism possible and even to this day are among the strongest defenders of religious freedom. In some minority communities, local churches are bedrock. Good luck finding that in the news today.
The common narrative is that conservatives mistreat and suppress women. But one truth that #MeToo has demonstrated is that certain (scumbag) high profile liberal politicos and celebrities gave lip-service to feminism so they could take sexual advantage. Many more liberals than conservatives in fact. But the stories that we get are that liberals Are Taking Steps while conservatives could care less.
In all these cases and many more, conservatives and conservative ideas are disparaged while the press presents liberal ideas as the Only Practical Solution. Never mind that many of those liberal ideas don't work and make things worse. After seeing that happen again and again, conservatives naturally distrust the media. They don't see the stories where their ideas and beliefs are celebrated. Those stories with a NEUTRAL bias are hardly ever there. The press passes itself off as mainstream when it isn't, and goes out of it's way to avoid stories that show conservatism in a good light.
As for libertarianism (CLASSIC liberalism), we get labeled as the kookiest of the those scary alt-right types. Never mind that isn't who we are. Never mind the merit of our ideas. No, we're the dangerous nutcases that you dare not listen to.
When the press shows that it can't be trusted with even some truths, why should the press be trusted? They demonized themselves long before Trump did.❞❞
“Control the Words, Control the Culture”
When government is "responsible" for something, regular people stop paying attention.
Read More...Thursday supersized roundup
Survey Says: Politicized Sports, Entertainment Driving Viewers Away
But some progressives have been saying it doesn't make a make a significant differenceDigitalships and Double-Standards
Document drop: Another fatal FBI fumble in Florida
What happens when diversity is more important than public safetyThe Schooling of David Hogg
Public spectacle doesn't mean you'll get respect. See also Dear David Hogg, You’re a Lying, Opportunistic, Insufferable Little Toe Rag
California judge holds climate change ‘tutorial’ ahead of landmark case against oil companies
This alone should be enough to show the judge's biasNOAA Data Tampering Approaching 2.5 Degrees
Completely rewriting climate historyEU reveals a digital tax plan that could penalize Google, Amazon and Facebook
The important thing is NOT that the EU is going after these companies. The important thing is that "traditional businesses" pay 23.2% in taxes.Why Trump Is Right to Reject the Paris Climate Agreement
It was never about reducing CO2. It was about the United States paying through the nose.The Problem With Social Justice Today -- Dividing Rather than Unifying
Labels, pronouns, and power over speech.Trump is right: The special counsel should never have been appointed
I still think the Obama and Clinton Russian connections should be investigated.Congress Is Still Ignoring Its Spending Problem as Deadline Looms for $1.3 Trillion Spending Bill
“Four out of five voters agree that Washington has a spending problem, but a new omnibus spending bill will add yet more to the national debt.”Freedom-Loving Parents, Rejoice: Utah Approves Free-Range Kids Bill
Let kids be kidsThe sad hysteria of the Southern Poverty Law Center
Targeting conservative people and groupsElizabeth Warren’s Unaccountable Federal Agency Backfires on Her: New at Reason
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is unconstitutional. All government agencies should answer to Congress.More California Cities Seek to Defy ‘Sanctuary State’ as Revolt Spreads
This could make the succession movement very interestingFrance: Toward Total Submission to Islam, Destruction of Free Speech
All other things being equal, the side that can't stand dissent is usually wrong.Syrup Smugglers Take on the Maple Mafia
The free market is economic activity between consenting adults. Funny how governments don't like that, "for your own good" of course.CalPERS retirees are suddenly worried about their pensions. What happened?
Government took too much power and mismanaged the assetsFired FBI official authorized criminal probe of Sessions, sources say
I'm not even sure this is legal against a sitting Attorney GeneralFOSTA Passes Senate, Making Prostitution Ads a Federal Crime Against Objections from DOJ and Trafficking Victims
Another headline grab for politicos“Welcome To Progressive Utopia”
“A society afraid of free speech is afraid of itself.
Anyone who needs a safe space from other people’s opinions should be in therapy”
Read More...Wednesday supersized roundup
Wednesday roundup
Israeli officials meet Qatari, Saudi and UAE counterparts at White House
With any other president, this would be front page news. North Korea, the Middle East, Russia. So what exactly did Obama do for his Nobel Peace Prize?Girl Scouts Write Anti-Smoking Legislation in Colorado
“A government for the children, of the children, by the children.”FBI Insiders Blow Whistle on Massive Las Vegas Cover Up; Agents Told Not to Investigate Key Evidence Including ISIS Terror Link
Not sure this is true, but we still don't know what happened. Somebody is covering stuff upHungary “Ready to Fight” United Nations Plan to Facilitate Global Mass Migration
Refugee migration was a total disaster for the EU, even if the elites don't want to admit itThe Federal Government's TIGER Program Splurges on Sidewalks in Rural Florida and Recreational Boat Ramps in Iowa
“It was supposed to be a temporary stimulus program. Instead it's an engine for pork.”Drunk History: When the Government Banned Female Bartenders
When government meddles, it costs freedomThe World Is Better Than Ever. Why Are We Miserable?
Something to think aboutStores use secret shopper score to track and decline returns
The article tries to sell this a Really Bad Thing, but really it's just the companies acting in self-defense.REVEALED: Obama Campaign Hired Fusion GPS To Investigate Romney
The same company that the Clinton campaign hired to for the Russia dossier,Last photographs of Stephen Hawking emerge showing him enjoying a night out in Mayfair as his children pay tribute to the professor's 'brilliance and humour' after he dies peacefully aged 76
What a brilliant man and a remarkable life3 Questions Congress Should Answer Before Bailing Out Obamacare
I don't think it should be bailed out. The free market would lower costs dramaticallyThe Meaning of Freedom
“I learned that to be strong wasn’t good enough; you had to use your strength to help those who were unable to help themselves. I learned that it is better to build than to destroy, and violence, even amongst warriors, is always a last resort.”Socialism Is Not Now, Nor Has It Ever Been, A Friend To Women
Freedom rests in choice and the free marketMonday roundup
We’re Letting Mentally Ill People Walk Around. Do You Like The Results?
The problem is what do you do with the people? And who decides what is mentally ill?Democrats Are Considering Dropping Superdelegates Altogether
There are reasons I don't like calling the Democrat party the "Democratic" partyA Heretical Plan for Cutting Spending on Education
“Government at all levels fuels an educational arms race through lavish and indiscriminate funding.”Going to College Is Selfish
“Let's stop pretending education is a public good.”The Women's March Has a Farrakhan Problem
“The group refuses to be accountable for a high-level alliance with an open anti-Semite.”The Psychology of Progressive Hostility
Excellently writtenThere is No "Free Trade"--There Is Only the Darwinian Game of Trade
I don't like it but he has a pointVisa Refuses to Cut Ties with Semi-Automatic Rifle Manufacturers
Good for themThe Campus Victim Cult
“A dialogue about why colleges and universities have become so hostile to freedom of thought”There Would Have Been No Soviet Communism If Not For Western Technology
Something to considerCapitalism Has Proven to Be the Best System For Feminism
Feminism could never have existed except in a capitalist systemIn 45 days, lawmakers pushed to expand and assert their power here, there and everywhere
Republicans can't be trusted with power eitherFreedom of Speech Should Protect All Opinion
Friday roundup
‘Barbarism’: Texas judge ordered electric shocks to silence man on trial. Conviction thrown out.
Freedom of speech also means freedom not to speakCIA Still Arguing Its Official Leaks To Journalists Shouldn't Be Subject To FOIA Requests
Codswallop. It's just because they don't want citizens taking a close look at their propagandaSanctuary Showdown: The Feds Sue California
Article I Section 8 gives Congress control of immigration. This is not a "states rights" thing, the Tenth Amendment does not applyGeek Squad's Relationship with FBI Is Cozier Than We Thought
I wonder if Best Buy's customers knew that the FBI was peeking into their computersGun crackdowns have already led to too many federal abuses
Government WILL abuse power. The only long term answer is reducing the power that government has.The Deleterious Effects of Our Tabloid Discourse
It's screwing with our thinking, says the guy typing blurbs for headlinesSouth Africa Is Prioritizing White Land Confiscation Over Critical Water Supply Needs
So who will be blamed for the drought?The Ever-Changing ‘Russia Narrative’ Is False Public Manipulation
Taxpayer funded no lessWhich Democrat is obstructing confirmation on Trump’s openly-gay nominee for Ambassador to Germany?
So now it's not enough that he is gay and very qualified? So much for looking out for minoritiesCNN, MSNBC Journalists Give Trump Glowing Praise for North Korea Move as Obama Flacks Lose It
These were the same journalists who a few months ago were saying that Trump was a clown who was endangering the world.The Robot Replacement for Fast Food Workers Has Finally Arrived
If it costs less than a salary would and is more reliable, this is the wave of the futureMedicare’s New Day
“The program’s privately managed plans provide quality care while controlling costs—and winning political support.”These communities sued Big Oil over climate change; then the backlash began
One lawsuit begats others. Irony abounds.Supersized Monday roundup
China Presses Its Internet Censorship Efforts Across the Globe
Will China demand censorship across the globe? A free internet is humanity's last, best hope.Schumer Will Vote ‘No’ On Judicial Nominee Because He Is White
“The nomination of Marvin Quattlebaum speaks to the overall lack of diversity in President Trump’s selections for the federal judiciary. Quattlebaum replaces not one, but two scuttled Obama nominees who were African American.”Schools are safer than they were in the 90s, and school shootings are not more common than they used to be, researchers say
There isn't a trend. See also School Shootings Have Declined Dramatically Since The 1990S. Does It Really Make Sense To Militarize Schools?Google tried censoring 'gun' shopping searches. It backfired
Someone didn't think it through. Well, it was a bad decision anyway, but the unintended consequences…The History of the 'Assault Weapon' Hoax. Part 1: The Crime that Started it All
“A 1989 shooting at a Cal. schoolyard began the national "assault weapon" issue. It was a consequence of law enforcement failure.”More cover-up questions
Remember Seth Rich?SHOCKER: Companies Pulling NRA Support Totally Backfires
People are taking the NRA boycott seriously. Just not the way the virtue signalers hoped.Obamacare: Will States do the Job that Congressional Republicans Have Failed to Do?
All sorts of implications hereSeven Feet Of Snow In Northern California Puts Screeching Halt To State’s Drought
You mean climate fixes itself?Why Did It Take Two Weeks To Discover Parkland Students’ Astroturfing?
This needs to be in the gun control (victim disarmament) discussion. Remember this The Parkland Teens Fighting For Gun Control Have The Backing Of These Huge Organizing GroupsHigh School Teacher Suspended For Pro-Gun Comments On Parkland Shooting
Thou shalt not dissentHow Lenders Are Turning Low-Level Courts Into Dickensian “Debt Collection Mills”
“Federal law outlawed debt prisons in 1833, but lenders, landlords and even gyms and other businesses have found a way to resurrect the Dickensian practice.”YouTube Purge Begins=> Top Conservative YouTube Sites Taken Down in February Sweep
Thou shalt not dissent OR criticizeReclaiming “Liberal”
In 1900 America, "liberal" meant what "libertarian" means todayLaura Moser Shakes Off the DCCC
This might be a glimpse of what happens next. See also When DCCC Calls, Hang Up the PhoneNeoNotes — news bias and agendas
Friday roundup
13 Ways Public Schools Incubate Mental Instability In Kids
The simplest solution is allowing more private schools unbound by most government regulationShooting Survivor: CNN Gave Me "Scripted Question" After Denying Question About Armed Guards
There is a political agenda, even if the kids are not crisis actors. See also CNN Scrambles: Denies ‘Scripted Question,’ Invites Pro-Gun Student to AppearJudge Nap: Order From New Judge in Michael Flynn Case Is 'Unheard-Of
It's looking more and more like Michael Flynn was blackmailed by the special prosecutor's officeThe Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Is Unaccountable. Trump’s Budget Tries to Change That.
No governmental agency should be unaccountable.Wendy McElroy: Privacy Prevents Violence and Crime
This contradicts the government narrative about privacy. That is the biggest reason you should pay close attention. Government is not your friend, especially when it is pretending to be.Money Laundering Via Author Impersonation on Amazon?
I didn't expect thatArmed School Resource Officer Stayed Safely Outside School While Mass Killing Was Underway
The professionalCompetition In Technology Is More Vibrant Than It Looks
It doesn't fit in the normal market segmentsAre We Free to Discuss America’s Real Problems?
“It is only when people are confronted with speech they don’t like that we see whether these abstractions are real to them. ”Police Announce Program to Illegally Stop People for ‘SAFE Driving’ & Facebook Owns Them
“Safe driving is now a reason for police to pull you over, check the inside of your car, demand your papers, and stomp what is left of the 4th Amendment into the ground.”“Cash Must Not Be Made the Scapegoat”
“In the War on Cash, a rare defense of physical money by an ECB Board Member.”Mueller Files Sealed New Charges in Manafort, Gates Case
Why does this look more and more like blackmail?Idaho is ignoring Obamacare rules. That could set off a catastrophic chain reaction.
Using the process against itselfShould Teachers Be Armed?
Sometimes even LewRockwell.com asks the right questionsSupersized Wednesday roundup
Wednesday roundup
When Border Searches Become Unreasonable
Warrantless searches are not a good ideaLegacies aren’t what they used to be as Obama faces environmental lawsuit
More and more questions about the Obama "library"Blowback: How Torture Fuels Terrorism Rather Than Reduces It
Somehow we're fueling revengeMore Proof Lib Media Bias Is Just A Myth…
This isn't a regular story, but it was just too goodPelosi’s Message To Democrats: Fight Anything Trump, Republicans Put Forward
Nothing about the meritsUS Army Going Old School With Training After Too Many Recruits Act “Entitled”
Time for some changesReport from Louisiana: Are Indie Booksellers Coming Back?
I'd love to see them bounce backScandal, Corruption, Lawbreaking — And So What?n
Interesting take on the attacks on TrumpBOMBSHELL: Comey Held Secret Obama White House Meeting Before The Inauguration
And he forgot to mention it to CongressCourt orders restoration of DACA program
The original program was done without Congress and is illegalIt's The (Democracy-Poisoning) Golden Age Of Free Speech
Wired makes the case against free speechBill Gates: tech companies inviting government intervention
Yeah, they kinda areDon’t Abandon the King Standard
We need to find common groundTuesday roundup
Inside The Two Years That Shook Facebook—And The World
Very long but a good summaryFederal abuses on Obama's watch represent a growing blight on his legacy
Some of us knew this during his first term'We are being targeted': Voodoo believers fear a backlash
There's a mess, but this article doesn't help sort it ourIs California Starting To Circle The Drain?
A long and almost unbelievable tale of what happens when the police aren't policing anymoreWe All Live on Campus Now
Groupthink spillover'Hire the best and fire the worst': Trump proposes biggest civil service change in 40 years
If this is a plan and not a negotiating ploy, it's a really good ideaAre Progressives More Biased Than Conservatives?
“Progressives generally assume that they're less biased than conservatives. New research shows otherwise.”Woman Dragged Out of West Virginia House Hearing For Listing Oil and Gas Contributions to Members
It's an issue that should be examined before they pass any lawCatholic School Parents Fight Lesbian Teacher's Firing. Here's Why That's Good.
Shifting moralityIf You Really Wanted to Ban Porn, Here's What It Would Take
Detailed look at exactly what it would takeNew York Times CEO: Print journalism has maybe another 10 years
Digital works better for millions of peopleCalifornia’s drought restrictions on wasteful water habits could be coming back — this time they’ll be permanent
Water is precious in the desert, and California has acted otherwise for decadesCommonwealth in secret succession plans
I didn't know that head of the Commonwealth wasn't hereditary.Monday roundup
I remind you that no American political fact for the last two years has been easily ascertained. Or static.
Read More...Wednesday roundup
Thursday roundup
“Stossel: The Southern Poverty Law Center Scam”
Thursday roundup
Walk towards the fire
““Walk toward the fire. Don’t worry about what they call you. All those things are said against you because they want to stop you in your tracks. But if you keep going, you’re sending a message to people who are rooting for you, who are agreeing with you. The message is that they can do it, too.””
— Andrew Breitbart
Anything at all
And yes, it influenced me. It's probably my favorite Orwell quote.
Thursday roundup
More clearing out the stack
❝The New York Times: Propaganda Machine❞
❝What Happens When Google Disagrees With You?❞
NeoNotes — net neutrality
As it exists right now, local, state, and Federal governments allow and protect area specific telecommunications monopolies.
Read More...Free speech
❝❝Free speech does not mean shutting the other guy up. It means you talk. It means sometimes you yell at each other and wave your fingers in each other's faces. It means you argue. It means you sit down over drinks and try to understand why they won't listen. It means giving the other the same respect you expect for yourself. At least until they show they don't deserve the respect. Even then, they get to talk.❞❞
— NeoWayland
Angry guys
“The Four Freedoms”
This was FDR's State of the Union address in January, 1941. It was another speech that changed everything.
Read More...NeoNotes - We need our ideas challenged
❝❝I believe that competition makes us honest. I believe that the "free market" applies more to just products and services, it applies to ideas and creeds and politics and practically anything else human. I believe that no one person and no one group has all the answers.NeoNotes are the selected comments that I made on other boards, in email, or in response to articles where I could not respond directly.
And yes, I know I've said all that before. But for me, it's as certain as the Earth beneath my feet and the stars above my head.
We need our ideas challenged. We need to argue with each other and wave our fingers under each others noses.
We don't need violence in the streets.
We don't need scapegoats.
And we don't need people using some undefined Moral Authority to prevent others from speaking.❞❞
85% of Americans support free speech over not offending others, says survey
73% Say Freedom of Speech Worth Dying For
❝❝A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey finds that an overwhelming 85% of American Adults think giving people the right to free speech is more important than making sure no one is offended by what others say. Just eight percent (8%) think it’s more important to make sure no one gets offended.>snip<
This shows little change from past surveying. Eighty-three percent (83%) think it is more important for the United States to guarantee freedom of speech than it is to make sure nothing is done to offend other nations and cultures.
Seventy-three percent (73%) agree with the famous line by the 18th century French author Voltaire: “I disapprove of what you say but will defend to the death your right to say it.” Only 10% disagree with that statement, but 17% are undecided.
Among Americans who agree with Voltaire, 93% rate freedom of speech as more important than making sure no one is offended. That compares to just 69% of those who disagree with the French author's maxim.❞❞
☆ Circus of hate
When I first read about Charlottesville, the first thing that flashed in my head was an image of an ex-military type grabbing an antifa and a neo-Nazi by the necks and shaking. There should be an adult right there disciplining the misbehaving children. Except we were told that the antifa were fighting the good fight. We kept hearing about how terrible the neo-Nazis were and how they should be forcibly removed. We didn't hear about how bad the antifa were. And when some of us pointed out that antifa also attacked people, well, that rated an attack right there. “False equivalence!” we heard. Nazi ideas were so very much worse than anything antifa said.
Apparently no one could possibly oppose the neo-Nazi violence and the antifa violence at the same time. If you did criticize the antifa, you were lumped in with the Nazis. Not because of what you said or did, but because you didn't support the struggle against the forces of racism and fascism and marginalization. The antifa were brave despite the institutionalized oppression they dared to fight in the name of victimized people everywhere.
Except the antifa have heavy political support. Some of their funding comes from Soros organizations. Some politicos look the other way when it comes to illegal antifa activities.
Charlottesville specifically looked like a setup. The antifa heavily outnumbered the neo-Nazis. The governor and the mayor didn't seem interested in keeping the peace. Police weren't acting like police. Some officers even said they were ordered to stand down.
It was a Roman circus, a spectacle to distract the crowds. The neo-Nazis looked scary, but the noble antifa would soon dispatch them. Once again the heroic forces of good would triumph over the unenlightened. Blood would flow into the sands.
Yep, it was almost as if it were scripted. A myth for the ages.
Grand spectacle.
For your amusement.
With clearly defined winners and losers.
Morality would win, even if it meant breaking the law in the name of the greater good.
Nahh, I thought. You're imagining things. Even you couldn't be that paranoid and cynical. That would require a level of political manipulation unheard of since…
Since the last presidential election. Since the ongoing media campaign against Donald Trump. Since the astroturf effort to convince Congress that campaign finance was a grassroots demand for change. Since the climate change alarmists. Since the introduction of gender fluidity in public school curriculum.
Well, blistering blue blazes.
I had bought into it. While I had focused on saying that violent protest was unacceptable, the media had established the new Utterly Despicable Villains in American myth.
And if you dared hesitate too long before denouncing the Utterly Despicable Villains and all they stood for, well then, you lost your Moral Authority™ to speak at all.
And like a fool, I walked into it with my eyes wide open.
I had been had.
I'm sure there was no central office planning it. Just a bunch of like-minded opportunists who saw a chance to prove that the American Dream was fatally flawed. That the song of freedom draws on an Unpardonable Sin that persisted to this very day! That the American flag was eternally stained with the blood of the oppressed. There could be no hope in liberty. It was all a lie.
Something stinks.
We still have time to fix this. We can't let this deceit become the prevailing myth.
America still does have a Dream. We can make a better World for ourselves and our children. Sure, we'll make mistakes, but we'll fix them. Nothing is carved in stone except the promise of a better tomorrow if we try hard enough. Our sins and our mistakes are our own. Recognizing those mistakes, fixing those mistakes, learning from those mistakes, that's the foundation we need. We're not locked into the sins of our fathers. Blame does not lead to the future.
Hope and liberty do. Take yours, if you dare.
Wednesday roundup
Electonic Frontier Foundation on hate speech
Monday roundup
China and India are dangerously close to military conflict in the Himalayas
While the rest of the world is fascinated by Brexit and Donald Trump.We Fight for the Users
Related - The Justice Department Wants to Know if You've Visited an Anti-Trump Resistance Site. This is a direct threat to you.Charlottesville and Its Aftermath: What if It Was a Setup?
We have no proof, this is all highly speculative rumor. But yeah. Related - Here’s How Virginia State Police Facilitated Violence At Charlottesville, ACLU fires back at Gov. McAuliffe after comments on violence at Charlottesville rallyNoam Chomsky: Antifa is a 'major gift to the Right'
I can't believe I'm agreeing with Chomsky for the fourth time in a week. But he's right. This time.Change the sheets and kiss the Byrd statue goodbye, West Virginia
If the Confederate general statues should be removed, then what about the memorials to a Senator who was a ranking KKK member?Is Google Working with Liberal Groups to Snuff Out Conservative Websites?
“In other words, nice website you've got there. It would be a shame if anything happened to it.” Related - Gathering Storms And Threats to Liberty, Leftist “journalist” Lauren Kirchner of ProPublica threatens Jihad Watch, Tech Censorship of White Supremacists Draws Criticism From Within Industry, & Silicon Valley escalates its war on white supremacy despite free speech concernsLibertarians of Convenience
“People identifying as urban progressives increasingly find their own goals stymied by laws and regulations, and they’re demanding that these restrictions be overturned or limited. In other areas of city policy, though—typically, when they don’t hold a personal stake—they often push aggressively for ever more regulations and a more intrusive government.”Results
The libertarian link got hardly any views and quickly moved from the front page to the much deeper.
The pagan link got a couple of hundred views in two days and sparked an interesting conversation.
I was surprised at the insistence on historical and political context for violence. It's also interesting that the article kept moving up and down.
I'm disappointed to see how many people believe that "hate speech isn't free speech" and that certain people don't deserve free speech rights.
☆ This last week in free speech
Let’s talk about the mess that took over my life this last week. I had a hunch I could be in deep on Friday night when I got some phone calls asking me what libertarians had to do with Charlottesville, Virginia.
Some know I don’t like email and a few have my number. If I had company over or if I had been watching a decent movie, I probably wouldn’t have answered the calls. This was the first I had heard of Charlottesville. I thought at first they were talking about Charlotte, North Carolina. I poked around on the internet and found out about a torchlit protest. Hey, I told folks, they have a right to free speech too. As long as they don’t burn anything down or do any other property damage, it was no skin off my nose.
I didn’t agree with what white nationalists and neo-Nazis stood for, but that is what free speech is all about. They could protest all they wanted as long as they followed the law.
But, all my callers said, it’s hate speech.
So? I replied. I threw out the quote (from me) I had been using for a few months.
❝❝I am certainly against Nazism, supremacist groups, and misogyny. I just think they SHOULD be heard, if for no other reason than they can be laughed off the stage.I said that no libertarian would support bigotry. I could see the issues about protecting the statues and I thought that deserved a very public discussion. But the racist chants shouldn’t have anything to do with that. It was two different issues and they shouldn’t be mixed.
As loudly and as enthusiastically as we can.❞❞
After the sixth or so call, the landline and the cell were both quiet. “Nice job,” I thought to myself. Another crisis averted. The folks I talked to would know that libertarians and Libertarians weren’t neo-Nazis or white nationalists. I patted myself on the back.
Then came Saturday. And I got flooded with emails. By Saturday night the phones were ringing.
I should explain. About twelve years back someone at Stormfront discovered Pagan Vigil and decided that I was something I am not. Some of my writings were passed around the internet. Worse, I was quoted out of context. Then some of my stuff was rewritten to make it seem that I supported certain causes and certain ideas. That took forever to mostly fix. But there are pockets left.
Then there was the mess from Florida. Long story short, white nationalists tried to co-opt part of the state Libertarian party. They were kicked out.
But here I was, a libertarian with supposed white nationalist ties. And a (scary? sexy? spooky?) pagan to boot. What did I have to say about vehicular homicide at a neo-Nazi rally?
Free speech is acceptable.
Unprovoked violence is not.
And you’d better be damn careful about “provoked” violence. Especially at a public protest.
People have the right to talk about their beliefs. People don’t have the right to impose those beliefs on others.
If you use force so others will listen, you’re doing it wrong.
All of the above went over pretty well. Here’s what didn’t.
I said that if the neo-Nazis were wrong to use violence first and not in self defense, so were the BLM members, the antifa, and the black bloc who had been doing exactly that for years. If you were a member of the right group, the authorities were mostly looking the other way. Mob violence had become part of American political culture again, and it wasn’t the neo-Nazis or the white nationalists who had made that happen.
Or for that matter, the Christian right, the Republicans, or the libertarians.
Violence was being used to shut down political discussion. What’s more, some groups were claiming moral authority because they had been victimized by American society. No one would be allowed to criticize if the proper groups were involved.
This. Was. Wrong.
This lay the groundwork for tyranny.
As you can imagine, those last five paragraphs did not go over well.
BLM, antifa, and the black bloc weren’t allowed to be guilty no matter what they have done or what they will do.
Anyone who says different is a racist. A fascist.
A Nazi.
And they must not be allowed to speak. At all. Under any circumstances. They must be silenced.
That’s when the pagan stuff started hitting the fan. If a pagan did not IMMEDIATELY drop everything and denounce the neo-Nazis and link them AND ONLY THEM to unprovoked violence, why, they were no better than the Nazis.
And therefore they must not be allowed to speak. At all. Under any circumstances. They must be silenced.
Suddenly free speech was only for the Morally Favored.
This made me angry. Not only was paganism getting dragged into a political situation (AGAIN) that favored progressives, but people were literally talking about Those Who Should Have Free Speech and Those Who MUST NOT BE ALLOWED Free Speech. Violence was ACCEPTABLE against Those Who MUST NOT BE ALLOWED Free Speech. The whole mess was pushing my buttons. I’m afraid I wasn’t always polite about it.
So that was my week. It cropped up again and again. Phone calls, face to face talks, internet discussion boards, and gods, the emails. People couldn’t or wouldn’t accept one simple idea. Take away someone else’s free speech today and you will lose yours tomorrow. Not might, will. The only sure way to protect your free speech is to protect other’s free speech. Even if you don’t like what they are saying.
Especially if you don’t like what they are saying.
Noam Chomsky (of all people) said something very similar.
““Goebbels was in favor of free speech for views he liked. So was Stalin. If you’re really in favor of free speech, then you’re in favor of freedom of speech for precisely the views you despise. Otherwise, you’re not in favor of free speech.””
That’s who I am. That’s where I stand. A right isn’t a right unless the other guy has it too.
— NeoWayland, pagan philosopher, libertarian, and part time troublemaker
Free speech
The A.C.L.U. Needs to Rethink Free Speech
Codswallop.❝❝That's what worries me most about this. Once people decide that some labels deserve free speech and others don't, where does it stop?❞❞
— NeoWayland
Thursday roundup
Wednesday roundup
Friday roundup
The Google Memo: Four Scientists Respond
Google doesn't believe in diversity of thought. Related - The Most Common Error in Media Coverage of the Google Memo, Google Fires Engineer For Noticing Men And Women Are Different, The Google Firing Demonstrates That Identity Politics Is Incoherent and Vicious & Google is more afraid of liberal outrage than federal lawGraphic Video Shows Cops Hold Down Handcuffed Teen, Torture Him With Taser—For Sleeping in Truck
Why haven't these police officers been charged with assault?The Guy Who Invented Those Annoying Password Rules Now Regrets Wasting Your Time
The rules don't work. Pay attention to the XKCD comic mentioned in the article.Obama administration knew about North Korea's miniaturized nukes
That Pentagon report that has everyone worried lately? It's from April of 2013. The Obama administration was notorious for released revised news and figures later, usually on Friday when no one was paying attentinon.Justice Officials Sent Talking Points to FBI on Lynch Tarmac Meeting With Bill Clinton
I'd say this qualifies as suspicious.Venezuela inflation quickens to 248.6 percent in year to July: opposition
Socialism fails every time it's tried.A New Report Raises Big Questions About Last Year’s DNC Hack
This one is from The Nation. It's the first major left wing source that even admitted that it may not be the Russians.The Afghan War Doesn't Need to Be Privatized—It Needs to Be EndedSo when does the perpetual war end?
Thursday roundup
Wednesday roundup
NeoNotes — the Johnson amendment
❝❝Let me point out that tax exempt status is at best a "devil's trade." In exchange for the tax deduction, the organizations (and sometimes the officers) lose their political voice and the IRS gets itemized lists of what was donated and who donated it.
There's also the small bit that if there are tax deductions, then by definition taxes are too high.
However, “Religion cannot be allowed the coercive power of government. Government cannot be allowed the moral justification of religion.”
The 1st Amendment doesn't deal with subsets. The incredibly ironic bit is the history of churches in American politics, particularly the abolitionist movement.
I didn't say it was a complete list, I said it was an itemized list. It is enough to find "known associates" though.
Tax deductions are evidence that taxes are too high. It's also evidence of diverting capital, taking it away from unapproved activities and moving it towards approved activities. There's more, but it involves a long examination of progressive tax systems and it won't add anything but noise to our conversation.
Abraham Keteltas, Samuel West, Jonathan Mayhew, Peter Muhlenberg, and Samuel Cooper were just some of the colonial era ministers. In England for a while, the American Revolution was called the Presbyterian Revolution because so many Presbyterian pastors were involved.
But the abolitionist movement and the American Civil War was when things really got going. Look at names like John Todd, Joshua Leavitt, Benjamin Bradford, Luther Lee, and Samuel Salisbury. Without these men and their churches, the abolitionist movement would never have blossomed. Christians aren't perfect and I am certainly a critic. But it took British and American Christians to end the slave trade, they deserve credit for that.
The 1950s-1960s civil rights movement was heavily rooted in churches, especially in the American south.
As I said, the tax exempt status is a "devil's trade" intended in large part to silence churches.
I provided examples which at the very least would have violated the propaganda restrictions of the Johnson amendment if it had been in effect then. Yet those are a valued part of American history and important benchmarks in religious freedom.
A little further examination would have shown that American churches and synagogues have traditionally called politicos out on bad ideas and bad behavior.
It's not about "prophesy of the pulpit." It's about moral authority. Ideas like liberty, revolution, and slavery were talked about during worship. In those days more than anything else including the press, worship is where those ideas were set out in detail by men who made their living communicating well and clearly. I admit it's a part of history that is often overlooked, but it exists none the less.
Take a closer look. The Johnson amendment covers both endorsement and anti-endorsement, intervening in political campaigns is prohibited. It also limits lobbying, propaganda, and other political activity.
Pagans of all people know what a bad idea it is when a politico wraps themselves in the flag and waves holy writ as justification.
BTW, I have to give you points for that phrase "prophesy of the pulpit." It's poetic if not exactly accurate in this case.
You're right, that part of the law is seldom enforced. I was waiting for someone to bring that up.
So here is my next question. If the law as it exists is so potentially prone to abuse even as it is not enforced, why does the Johnson amendment exist?
My theory is that it was one of Johnson's infamous deals. In the early 1950s, the modern civil rights movement was just getting started, but the split was already there. It's a little inaccurate, but I call the two sides the MLK side and the Malcolm X side. Later the Malcolm X side was dominated by the Black Panthers, but that part of the story isn't necessary for our discussion here.
The MLK side wanted to work within the system making sure that existing law was enforced. The Malcolm X side relied on direct confrontation to create radical change and separate from the US if necessary. There was rivalry between the two sides, and at the time no one was sure which side would dominate. Johnson saw the potential need for what today we would call the nuclear option. As long as everything proceeded peacefully, the government would never need to use the stick. Meanwhile, everything was nicely registered and reported to the government, "just in case."
It wasn't the first time the IRS was used to monitor Americans and it wouldn't be the last.
You're right. I should have said existing Constitutional law, that was my mistake.
That wasn't the only operational difference, but it certainly was one of the most important. Bryan Burrough points out in Days of Rage that some "blacks" were disappointed as more moved north and they didn't instantly get more of what they felt had been denied them.
Existing state and local law in the south supported segregation, most Federal law did not. It varied in other states, not so much in the West but heavy in union states. When Truman reversed Wilson's segregation of the armed forces, the writing was on the wall.
Under what part of the 1st Amendment is Congress granted the power to regulate free speech?
Under what part of the 1st Amendment is Congress granted the power to regulate religion?
Yet the Johnson amendment does both.
Which tax argument? The fact that deductions mean that taxes are too high? Or that government uses a progressive tax code to encourage some behaviors and discourage others?
Can you show that either argument is BS?
Actually it does.
The perception in America is that you are not a "real" church unless you have tax exempt certification. Just like a few years back when conservative groups were having problems getting 503 certification, most people don't want to give money unless they know that the IRS is not going to audit them. The easy path is to do what the government tells you to do. That is not necessarily the right thing. Once a group has the certification, they are bound by the regulations if they wish to keep the majority of their donors. Those regulations are subject to change at any time, and have gotten more restrictive since the Johnson amendment was passed.
Every dollar that the government collects in taxes reduces individual purchasing power. Regardless of what some experts will tell you, the economy is driven by the individual buying goods and services and not by government regulation. More money, more purchases (or savings). Less money, more credit, less purchases and less savings.
Even if you think that only the "rich" pay higher taxes, that means less money for things like jobs, equipment, and expansion. That means less economic growth.
The second order effects of special taxes can be even worse. A few decades ago, Congress put out a luxury tax on high end planes, yachts, high end boats, and cars. All those industries took a major hit. Building and storing yachts and high end boats still haven't recovered.
It gets worse. Thanks to payroll withholding and "standard" deductions, the government effectively gives itself no-interest loans from your money. Multiply that by a hundred million or so and you get into some serious cash.
These are examples from taxes. I haven't discussed currency manipulation (inflation) or spending.
"Surely by your argument, there should be no tax exempt organizations at all, because the very existence of them proves taxes are too high."
Yes.
At the very least, no tax exempt organizations would mean fewer bureaucrats to monitor compliance and regulate.
"Government money goes back into the community and absolutely does stimulate economic growth."
It does that by displacing private investment. Private money wants a return on investment, which means maintaining facilities and periodic upgrades. Except for corporatism, companies stay in business by making their products better, cheaper, and more available.
"The rich actually mostly sock money away…"
Um, no they don't. There isn't a money vault or a stuffed mattress, smart people put their money to work. Some buy stocks, some buy bonds, some invest in companies. Unless the money earns a higher yield than the rate of inflation and the tax rate, it's worth less.
"…and pay LOWER taxes than the rest of us…"
According to the National Taxpayer Union Foundation, in 2014 the top ten percent of income earners paid 70.88% of the income tax. The top fifty percent of income earners paid 97.25% of the income tax.
Spending is not the same as taxing. Government at all levels has done a rotten job of maintaining facilities, much less upgrading them. Private ownership does wonders, as things like the Empire State Building show.
Government usually puts money aside for infrastructure and then diverts the money into more "essential" things. It's one of the oldest tricks in government accounting. Then more money is "needed."
What's more, government is a lousy judge of where to spend and what to spend it on. Just as one example, less than a handful of VA hospitals are worth it, but we keep tossing more and more money at the problem.❞❞
NeoNotes are the selected comments that I made on other boards, in email, or in response to articles where I could not respond directly.
Wednesday roundup
from crux № 19 — Free market
from crux № 11 — Ultimate truth
❝❝I've seen the arguments in enough other contexts to distrust anyone who claims rationality prevents any opposing view. Even more so when they dismiss any other possibility unheard because they have the Ultimate Truth That Must Not Be Questioned.❞❞Read More...
— NeoWayland
Language of force
Monday roundup
Feds Turn Burning Man Into a Police State, Announce Drug Tests for Attendees and Mass Spying
The more weird attention you draw, the bigger example the authorities will try to make you.Maine's state legislature shot down a bill that would criminalize female genital mutilation
They are afraid it might offend Muslims. No word about how not passing the law might offend the women who are targeted.Religious leaders get high on magic mushrooms ingredient – for science
There's long been evidence that certain psychodelics have psycological and spiritual benefits.Point: Trump’s War on Junk Science
Junk science has been part of American policy.People Over Process: Why Democracy Doesn’t Justify Exclusion
I've said before that freedom is the goal, not democracy.You’re Asking the Wrong Questions
Free speech in the days of Trump.FINALLY!! It's about damn time!
“Speech may not be banned on the ground that it expresses ideas that offend.”
““A law found to discriminate based on viewpoint is an “egregious form of content discrimination,” which is “presumptively unconstitutional.” … A law that can be directed against speech found offensive to some portion of the public can be turned against minority and dissenting views to the detriment of all. The First Amendment does not entrust that power to the government’s benevolence. Instead, our reliance must be on the substantial safeguards of free and open discussion in a democratic society.””
— Justice Anthony Kennedy
NeoNotes — Deserved to be heroes
For length reasons, this entry appears on it's own page.
“We let generations be victims when they deserved to be heroes.”
Read More...from crux № 10 — the system
Newspeak devours free speech
What ‘Snowflakes’ Get Right About Free Speech
““Instead of defining freedom of expression as guaranteeing the robust debate from which the truth emerges, Lyotard focused on the asymmetry of different positions when personal experience is challenged by abstract arguments. His extreme example was Holocaust denial, where invidious but often well-publicized cranks confronted survivors with the absurd challenge to produce incontrovertible eyewitness evidence of their experience of the killing machines set up by the Nazis to exterminate the Jews of Europe. Not only was such evidence unavailable, but it also challenged the Jewish survivors to produce evidence of their own legitimacy in a discourse that had systematically denied their humanity.
Lyotard shifted attention away from the content of free speech to the way certain topics restrict speech as a public good. Some things are unmentionable and undebatable, but not because they offend the sensibilities of the sheltered young. Some topics, such as claims that some human beings are by definition inferior to others, or illegal or unworthy of legal standing, are not open to debate because such people cannot debate them on the same terms.
The recent student demonstrations at Auburn against Spencer’s visit — as well as protests on other campuses against Charles Murray, Milo Yiannopoulos and others — should be understood as an attempt to ensure the conditions of free speech for a greater group of people, rather than censorship. Liberal free-speech advocates rush to point out that the views of these individuals must be heard first to be rejected. But this is not the case. Universities invite speakers not chiefly to present otherwise unavailable discoveries, but to present to the public views they have presented elsewhere. When those views invalidate the humanity of some people, they restrict speech as a public good.””
— Ulrich Baerh/t Bookworm Room
What a liberal university used to mean
“In defense of the offensive“ & “A microcosm of the maddening mix of Progressive hate, ignorance, and nonsense at an American college”
Read More...Secret demands
“Court Rules Facebook Can’t Challenge Demands for User Data (and Can’t Tell Users)”
Read More...Apple patented blocking smartphone cameras
Take this Apple patent. An IR sensor receives a coded signal and disables the camera on a smart phone. Now at first glance, this might frustrate customers at concerts but it would make artists and music publishers happy. It's a tradeoff and customers will learn to accept it for their own good. After all, this is Apple we're talking about here.
Except, not quite.
Apple is usually about what the customer wants. Sometimes they goof. And sometimes Apple has to make compromises to get their product out there. It usually works out well.
Kinda. Sorta. Maybe.
Apple is saying that it could be used to block concerts. But not just concerts. Sensitive events.
This time I can see some damn scary possibilities. And not just me. Also here and here (HT to Daring Fireball for those last two).
It turns out that police can be very critical and aggressive when citizens film what police do. A Federal judge has ruled that filming police is not protected by the First Amendment. Yep. Police can seize your phone, even when you film them breaking the law. The are ways that could make the situation easier, but it's already tense. A little prep can go a long way here.
But if the police turn on a IR gizmo that disables your camera, then they don't have to deal with you. If this technology is introduced, do you really think police departments and Federal agencies won't find a reason to use it?
And of course it's for your own good. And public safety.
We already have agencies regularly abusing or ignoring FOIA requests in direct violation of the law. Now imagine Federal buildings and offices with the IR gizmo permanently installed and permanently on. How long do you think it will take state and local agencies to do the same thing?
And politicos? Hillary Clinton is famous for banning reporters from her campaign. She gives speeches where the press is closed out.
The two national parties have have designated "free speech" areas away from the action during the last few nominating conventions.
How easy it will be to put up the IR gizmos and not worry about any embarrassing videos on YouTube?
Of course the major news organizations will have exemptions. For the good of the nation, you see. Just because the news will be more spoon-fed when there aren't a bunch of angry citizens questioning the Official Story® with their own footage, well, that shouldn't be an issue, should it? The press will always look out for the little guy, right?
So don't complain, Citizen, this is for your own good. It's for the Nation. It's for security. It's for the American Spirit. It's for your freedom. Your own government will tell you so.
Relax Citizen, it won't hurt.
Much.
And after a while, you won't even notice.
Maybe I am overreacting.
The patent is real. The rest is speculation.
So far.
Public blasphemy
Battle flag - updated
The question remains, why was the flag acceptable last year but is not acceptable this year?
Read More...Watching the headlines #3
“Doctors' Criticism Of ObamaCare Silenced By ACA Bureaucrats”
“Save the Bees: Eliminate Biofuel Mandates”
“Obama To Circumvent Congress With ‘Gag Order’ On Firearm Coverage”
“You Can Be Prosecuted for Clearing Your Browser History”
Read More...from crux № 4 — The U.S. is not a "Christian nation"
And here is where I am about to offend many of you. Are you paying close attention?
Read More...The standard argument
This is a page from the original version of Pagan Vigil. There are some formatting differences. Originally published at www.paganvigil.com/C49491493/E20070715134558
An argument against gun control has much wider application than I realized
Anyway, the film sparked a discussion on gun control. I dragged out standard libertarian argument 3B. "The people who pay attention to gun laws are not the ones you should be worried about."
Later battling insomnia sipping hot grapefruit juice (don't knock it till you have tried it), it occurred to me that was probably THE standard libertarian argument, not just against gun control but against almost every bad law.
Illegal drugs? "The people who pay attention to drug laws are not the ones you should be worried about."
Prostitution? Same thing.
Global warming?
Freedom of speech?
Unusual sexual practices?
Minority religions?
It applies to every single one.
For most people, making something illegal won't change their morality. It might prevent someone from abusing a freedom, but more likely it will just restrict the freedom of those who have already proved that they are responsible adults.
So at that point, don't these laws simply impose immoral and irresponsible conditions in the name of freedom?
The people who will obey the law will obey. And those taking advantage will simply break the law with no real consequences. The only things that increase are taxes and government power.
Who really benefits by making someone sign for cough medicine?
Posted: Sun - July 15, 2007 at 01:45 PM