Monday - 19Aug2019 Filed in:
Free Speech❝❝A public forum is mostly open to anyone who would speak and write, but the owners and operators of the forum can't be held responsible for what others write and say.
A publisher selects content and is responsible for what is written and said.
The First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution does not apply to private entities or individuals.
Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act is a decent compromise. If I am a publisher or broadcaster or webmaster, I'm under no obligation to provide a place for your thoughts and opinions. My choice controls the content. But that makes me responsible for the content.
If I don't provide the content, then I don't have liability.
The more moderation I provide, the more liability.
The job of social media is to provide access while people make up their own minds.❞❞
Tags: public forum ∙ publisher ∙ Section 230 ∙ Communications Decency Act ∙ First Amendment ∙ social media ∙ liability ∙ moderation
Monday - 19Aug2019 Filed in:
Free Speech&Politics
Thursday - 18Apr2019 Filed in:
Politics&Morality & Modern Life
Thursday - 28Feb2019 Filed in:
Headlines&Politics&Free Speech
Tuesday - 11Dec2018 Filed in:
Headlines&Free Markets&Ecology
Saturday - 10Nov2018 Filed in:
Free Speech““Either way — platform or publisher — Big Tech loses, as long as the government forces it to one side or the other. If platform, then the FAAGs have to tolerate thought criminals using their services, just as if they were a common carrier, like a telephone utility. If publisher, then Big Tech can be sued to kingdom come and charged with innumerable violations of federal law.
””Tags: clipping ∙ Facebook ∙ Amazon ∙ Apple ∙ Google ∙ big tech ∙ social media
Friday - 02Nov2018 Filed in:
Headlines&Politics&Law&Ecology
Monday - 29Oct2018 Filed in:
Quotes & Thinkums&Free Speech““One of the Best Arguments Against Blocking Speech on Social Media....
...is so we become aware of who might be dangerous.””
— Robert Wenzel, One of the Best Arguments Against Blocking Speech on Social Media....
Tags: Robert Wenzel ∙ social media ∙ blocking speech ∙ dangerous
Thursday - 25Oct2018 Filed in:
Headlines
Wednesday - 17Oct2018 Filed in:
Headlines&Politics
Tuesday - 20Mar2018 Filed in:
Headlines&Free Markets
Sunday - 18Feb2018 Filed in:
Headlines
Tuesday - 23Jan2018 Filed in:
Headlines&Law&Politics&Ecology
Remember, the exchanges were never meant to last. And this is another mess that Obama chose to have his successor fix.
He can't, not legally. If the code changes and Trump gives the order, it's a court martial offense.
FBI monitored social media on Election Day for 'fake news' about Hillary Clinton: Report
So who gave the order? And did this really happen?
Australia's Bureau of Meteorology apparently gooses the numbers before they become Official™.
“If we Americans value freedom, we will dismiss the social engineers, open the borders, and liberate ourselves.”
I don't think it will happen, but you can practically feel the
NY Times drool
Something I never considered but well worth thinking about.
I'm not sure the growth is stable, but yes, the numbers did surge. And yes, Obama would have killed for those numbers.
Tags: Obamacare ∙ health insurance ∙ transgender ∙ Coast Guard ∙ Donald Trump ∙ FBI ∙ social media ∙ 2016 election ∙ fake news ∙ Hillary Clinton ∙ Venezuela ∙ Australia's Bureau of Meteorology ∙ immigration ∙ social engineers ∙ Republican shadow campaign ∙ New York Times ∙ Dunkirk ∙ job growth ∙ Barack Obama