❝❝A terrifyingly surprising number of police officers also have "incidents of domestic abuse in their background." Not most to be sure, but the field seems to draw some really f…ed up people. Worse, police are legally shielded from the consequences of their own actions.

If the current "red flag law" proposals are any indication, almost all the criteria will certainly be political. Considering that most people including psychiatrists and psychologists are incapable of judging competence, motives, or morality without some intense analysis, that is asking for trouble.

Here's what you do not want to acknowledge. Most people are not criminal. Most gun owners don't casually shoot other people or property. And there is not a single background check that will prevent every possible mass shooter.

Now I could go on and on. I could point out that American gun laws originated to keep guns out of the hands of "blacks". I could list the puppycide incidents. I could point out the militarization of police, especially in the "War on Drugs." All of this overlooks one very simple thing. The Second Amendment exists because the Founders did not trust government.

All your suggestions, all your proposals, everything you've said will arm more government agents while making the populace unarmed. Tell me, do you want Trump's government heavily armed while you are not?❞❞

Tags: Second Amendment ∙ red flag law ∙ background checks ∙ War on Drugs ∙ government

Tags: Brexit ∙ Will Hurd ∙ private property ∙ Texas ∙ judge ∙ election ∙ Wisconsin ∙ lame duck ∙ special counsel ∙ Donald Trump ∙ lawyer ∙ Amazon ∙ Watergate ∙ government action ∙ masculinity ∙ boycott ∙ BDS ∙ Green Berets ∙ France ∙ yellow vest ∙ Emmanuel Macron ∙ class action lawsuit ∙ election tampering ∙ Navy ∙ USS Fitzgerald ∙ probe ∙ Real ID ∙ national security ∙ New York ∙ gun rights ∙ FISA ∙ DoJ ∙ Steele Dossier ∙ Hillary Clinton ∙ privacy ∙ Tim Cook ∙ Apple ∙ FTC ∙ Facebook ∙ children ∙ California ∙ Third World ∙ credit card companies ∙ censorship ∙ Second Amendment

❝❝Unscientific test.

Two video monitors of equal size. A dozen people, some of who were Democrats. Both videos played side by side with the volume turned down. All but one person thought that Trump came across stronger, more confident, better body language, and more convincingly. One guy said that Pelosi and Schumer looked like high school student council candidates.

Again, I don't like Trump and I don't trust Trump. But compared to the Democrat leadership, well, there's no comparison.

Is anyone else reminded of the Kennedy-Nixon debate?❞❞

❝❝Kennedy vs. Nixon.

Regardless of what was said, visually Trump came across looking very well. Pelosi and Schumer came across looking like two high schoolers running for student council. That observation isn't mine, but I am caging it anyway. Why in the World were they sharing a lectern?

Trump came across as an executive with pictures of his loved ones in the background. And with only one American flag. Pelosi and Schumer looked like they got kicked out of the cafeteria and they dragged in flags to make the walls look good.

As an aside, the trend of using multiple flags behind you to show your patriotism is stupid.

Kennedy vs. Nixon.

---

If you'll remember, I told you before you need to focus on the things that Trump does that are actually wrong. I specifically mentioned his misuse of eminent domain in the past. Lo and behold, the key part of his emergency plan is eminent domain.

Peepers, you focus on the wrong things when you attack Trump. You have from the very first. And you continually mistake my not agreeing with you as support of Trump.

Trump has been making Democrats look bad since he announced. It doesn't help when Democrats continually underestimate him. Even if they ignore everything that Trump did before, there's not a one of the Democrat Congressional leadership who has ever negotiated anything outside government. Trump is playing this exactly right and the optics reflect that.

You want to take Trump down? I'll tell you what to focus on. Eminent domain. The volatility of the stock market. Not the direction, but how fast and how far it changes direction. There's some major instability there. His treatment of the EU, particularly downgrading the ambassador. National security, particularly spying on Americans. Healthcare. War on drugs. Prescription drugs and self medication. The Second Amendment. Social Security and pensions. The national debt. Military spending and accountability. Free speech. Protectionism. Start with those.

You can't treat him as a Republican politico because he isn't one. And don't forget that this man has been dragging his fights and negotiations through the press for forty years. Remember that exchange from the first Pirates of the Caribbean movie about the worst pirate. Trump doesn't care if the press is good or bad, he just wants the press.

---

This came from an unscientific experiment that some friends and I did. And yes, some of them were Democrats. We ran the videos side by side on two monitors with the sound turned off.

Trump looked like he belonged. Pelosi and Schumer didn't. Their body language showed that they were unhappy, probably because they were sharing a lectern and neither wanted to share the spotlight. Pay attention to their hands specifically. Trump looked friendly, Pelosi and Schumer looked like they wanted to strangle someone.

I never have liked the multiple American flag thing, not even when it started with Bush League. I think it was him, he was the one I noticed using it first. Certainly the Democrats of that time were doing it. I think it is purposely distracting. Come to think of it, that's when I remember multiple Democrats sharing a lectern. Or at least all standing behind one person at the lectern.

As for the Z group, I adjusted my tactics accordingly. They wanted to ignore the political implications when those same implications were central to the argument, whether they wished to acknowledge that or not.

You on the other hand don't like to deal when facts or actions don't fit your script. You think that opposing someone means throwing every insult and accusation possible at them in the hope that something sticks. You're not willing to look the person's history and adjust accordingly. You let the labels control your expectations and then get frustrated when things don't turn out the way you want.

I was never against criticizing Trump. I was against criticizing Trump stupidly foolishly in ways that would make him look stronger and better. Throwing insults at him doesn't work, he just pushes back. Treating him as the typical Republican politico who will back down out of civility or for the greater good doesn't work because that is not what he does.

It's not that I support Trump. I just think you are attacking him in very stupid and amazingly ineffective ways.❞❞

Tags: Donald Trump ∙ Democrats ∙ Nancy Pelosi ∙ Chuck Schumer ∙ Kennedy-Nixion debate ∙ multiple flags ∙ eminent domain ∙ underestimating ∙ negptiate ∙ stock market ∙ volatility ∙ EU ∙ ambassador ∙ national security ∙ spying on Americans ∙ health care ∙ War on Drugs ∙ prescription drugs ∙ self medication ∙ Second Amendment ∙ Social Security ∙ pensions ∙ national debt ∙ military spending ∙ accountability ∙ protectionism ∙ Republican ∙ politicos ∙ press ∙ political opinions ∙ insult ∙ label

Headlines that don't merit their own entry

Tags: Second Amendment ∙ Pennsylvania ∙ dental care. ∙ islamist ∙ jihadist ∙ Palestine ∙ census ∙ citizenship question ∙ Syria ∙ Rex Tillerson ∙ Mitch McConnell ∙ Senate ∙ FirstEnergy ∙ Skripal ∙ Silicon Valley ∙ regulation ∙ competition ∙ Andrew McCabe ∙ DoJ ∙ FBI ∙ gun control ∙ David Hogg ∙ free range kids ∙ hemp ∙ Congress

Headlines that don't merit their own entry

Tags: free range kids ∙ Utah ∙ police violence ∙ Detroit ∙ police misconduct ∙ sex change ∙ trans people ∙ fingerprint ∙ drought ∙ Southwest ∙ Facebook ∙ puppicide ∙ kids ∙ bad cops ∙ secret police records ∙ #MarchForOurLives ∙ Second Amendment ∙ Millennials ∙ gun control ∙ Wellesley College ∙ Freedom Projec ∙ diversity ∙ dissent

Headlines that don't merit their own entry

Tags: Facebook ∙ diversity ∙ census ∙ Electronic Health Records ∙ Second Amendment ∙ Paul Stevens ∙ Cambridge Analytica ∙ bad cops ∙ Android phones ∙ Microsoft ∙ offensive language ∙ Obama campaign ∙ Planned Parenthood ∙ Disney ∙ Europe ∙ refugee ∙ Silicon Valley ∙ internet ∙ conservative ∙ Parkland shooting

Headlines that don't merit their own entry

Tags: Obama campaign ∙ VA ∙ Robert Mueller ∙ CFPB ∙ bullying ∙ parenting ∙ Elizabeth Warren ∙ social media ∙ FISA ∙ Carter Page ∙ DoJ ∙ Cambridge Analytica ∙ Trump campaign ∙ anthrax attacks ∙ wheelchair ∙ Facebook ∙ New York ∙ Congressman ∙ Second Amendment ∙ revolt ∙ California ∙ sucession

Tags: religious tolerance ∙ China ∙ internet ∙ Billings ∙ Donald Trump ∙ homeless ∙ Los Angeles ∙ Second Amendment ∙ Pittsburgh ∙ Amazon ∙ Italy ∙ EU citizens ∙ Euroscepticism ∙ mass migration ∙ Derry ∙ Republican ∙ Democrat ∙ BuzzFeed ∙ gun control ∙ Robert Mueller ∙ Facebook ∙ Southern Poverty Law Center ∙ marijuana ∙ Calaveras County ∙ Google ∙ censorship ∙ Dick’s Sporting Goods ∙ virtue signaling ∙ public schools ∙ Parkland ∙ shooting ∙ Barack Obama

You should know these rights. You should defend these rights.

Tags: Bill of Rights ∙ First Amendment ∙ Second Amendment ∙ Third Amendment ∙ Fourth Amendment ∙ Fifth Amendment ∙ Sixth Amenedment ∙ Seventh Amendment ∙ Eighth Amendment ∙ Ninth Amendment ∙ Tenth Amendment

Our heroes are defined by what they have done and how they inspire us.

Tags: Crux Files ∙ Robert A. Heinlein ∙ Lawrence W. Reed ∙ certainty ∙ perfection ∙ government ∙ promises ∙ good intentions ∙ price distortions ∙ prudent person ∙ Congress ∙ new regulations ∙ second order consequences ∙ third order consequences ∙ feedback loop ∙ politicos ∙ loan game ∙ free money ∙ something for nothing ∙ Second Amendment ∙ neither help nor hinder ∙ Christians ∙ outsourced wages ∙ industrial nations ∙ free to choose ∙ Judeo-Christian ∙ Christianity ∙ Constitution ∙ E pluribus unum ∙ one from many ∙ united we stand ∙ codified law ∙ public morality ∙ religious system ∙ The Moral Authority ∙ personal morality, ∙ multiple faiths

Black Guns Matter Preaches A Pro-Second Amendment Message in Minnesota

❝❝MINNEAPOLIS — “I’m a reformed scumbag from North Philly that tryin’ to do the right thing,” was a powerful statement that quieted a small conference room in Hotel Minneapolis.

Maj Toure, the founder of Black Guns Matter, made his way to the Twin Cities for a long weekend to spread his message to black communities.

Appearing on the Twin Cities radio show, “Black Republican Black Democrat,” Toure said that he created Black Guns Matter because he was “tired” of seeing his friends die at the hands of police officers and the hands of one another.

His message is simple. Educating everyone, but especially people of color, about their second amendment rights, gun safety, and encouraging a community stigmatized by gun violence to own guns to protect themselves.❞❞
     — Preya Samsundar

Tags: clipping ∙ Second Amendment ∙ Preya Samsundar ∙ Maj Toure ∙ Black Guns Matter ∙ Twin Citie ∙ gun rights ∙ gun safety ∙ gun violence