“The Drunken, Pagan History of Christmas” by Adam Ruins Everything
“Should We Trust the Media?” from Roaming Millennial
NeoNotes — Off Limits
Behind locked doors and privacy fences, I am "free to do what I want." But is that freedom?
Read More...How Prostitutes Settled the Wild West - Adam Ruins Everything
❝Penn & Teller on flag burning❞
“Minimum Wage Laws Are Racist”
NeoNotes — American Christmas
❝Roaming Millenial on the Alt-Right❞
Secret group creates blacklist
Washington Post Disgracefully Promotes a McCarthyite Blacklist From a New, Hidden, and Very Shady Group
Read More...Soros manipulating media
“Leaked Documents Reveal Expansive Soros Funding to Manipulate Federal Elections”
Read More...Abnormal
Dear Media: Please Stop Normalizing the Alt-Right
❝❝For Jew-hating racists, the attention means they can playact as a viable and popular movement with pull in Washington. In return, many in the media get to confirm their own biases and treat white supremacy as if it were the secret ingredient to Republican success.
Meanwhile, this obsessive coverage of the alt-right not only helps mainstream a small movement but it's also exactly what the bigots need and want to grow.
Check out the coverage of this weekend's National Policy Institute conference in Washington. As far as I can tell, these pseudointellectual xenophobic bull sessions have been going on for years, featuring many of the same names. These people have generally been given the attention they deserve, which is to say exceptionally little. If you read this week's headlines, though, you would have thought the German American Bund had packed 22,000 cheering fascists into the Ronald Reagan International Trade Center.❞❞
“Instead of Famine — Thanksgiving!”
Hoodwinking Congress - blast from the past (2005)
Buying Reform
❝❝Charged with promoting campaign-finance reform when he joined Pew in the mid-1990s, Treglia came up with a three-pronged strategy: 1) pursue an expansive agenda through incremental reforms, 2) pay for a handful of "experts" all over the country with foundation money and 3) create fake business, minority and religious groups to pound the table for reform.
"The target audience for all this activity was 535 people in Washington," Treglia says — 100 in the Senate, 435 in the House. "The idea was to create an impression that a mass movement was afoot — that everywhere they looked, in academic institutions, in the business community, in religious groups, in ethnic groups, everywhere, people were talking about reform."
It's a stark admission, but perhaps Treglia should be thanked for his candor.>snip<
But this money didn't come from little old ladies making do with cat food so they could send a $20 check to Common Cause. The vast majority of this money — $123 million, 88 percent of the total — came from just eight liberal foundations.
These foundations were: the Pew Charitable Trusts ($40.1 million), the Schumann Center for Media and Democracy ($17.6 million), the Carnegie Corporation of New York ($14.1 million), the Joyce Foundation ($13.5 million), George Soros' Open Society Institute ($12.6 million), the Jerome Kohlberg Trust ($11.3 million), the Ford Foundation ($8.8 million) and the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation ($5.2 million).
Not exactly all household names, but the left-wing groups that these foundations support may be more familiar: the Earth Action Network, the NOW Legal Defense and Education Fund, People for the American Way, Planned Parenthood, the Public Citizen Foundation, the Feminist Majority Foundation . . .
What did this liberal foundation crowd buy with its $123 million?
For starters, a stable of supposedly independent pro-reform groups, with Orwellian names you may have heard in the press: the Center for Public Integrity, the William J. Brennan Center for Justice, Democracy 21 and so on.
Plus, favorable press coverage. Here, the story — as laid out in the Political Money Line report — gets really ugly.❞❞
Fake isn't always fake
❝Roaming Millennial on allegations❞
Right to boycott
“Fashion Designers Are Boycotting Melania Trump. Shouldn't Bakers and Florists Have the Same Right?”
Read More...“The Nature of Liberty”
the Pagan Vigil Reader - updated
NeoNotes — Pre-victimhood
❝❝The man has not even been sworn in yet. Nobody knows what he's going to do. Some this this same stuff was going around about both Bush the Elder and Bush League, it didn't happen.
Personally I'm a little tired of being lectured about which Tragic Victim Group I'm supposed to genuflect before to show my compassion this week. The second someone escalates their victimhood over all others because of a label is the second I lose interest. Might-be-victims are even less interesting.
You have rights because you are human. Not because you are gay or transgender. Not because you are pagan or Navajo. And not because you are a man or a woman. Because you are human.
I won't defend rights because of labels. I won't fight for privilege that comes at the expense of others. I won't acknowledge group rights. I won't accept responsibility for things I didn't do or say.
I won't feed the victimhood anymore. But I WILL take a stand for human rights. Talk to me when someone has been denied their human rights and we'll see what we can do then. If that's not enough, I can't help you.
Until then, it hasn't happened and I'm not going to worry about it.❞ class="ghoster">❞
NeoNotes are the selected comments that I made on other boards, in email, or in response to articles where I could not respond directly.
❞❞
❝❝
More back down
NeoNotes — Laci Green
❝❝Because I lost a wager, I spent some time looking at Laci Green videos a while back. The stuff on sex is pretty good, the stuff on relationships is so-so, and the SJW stuff is just destructive. Although in her defense, I don't think she has thought through the implications.
Anyway, the chances of someone under 25 knowing very much about relationships are pretty slim. Particularly when their solution is for at least half of humanity to submit to their wisdom and change their ways.❞ class="ghoster">❞
NeoNotes are the selected comments that I made on other boards, in email, or in response to articles where I could not respond directly.
❞❞
❝❝
Unholy alliance
❝❝Her politics don't allow for dissent.
That tells me more than I need to know.❞❞
I wrote that Friday morning about Laci Green.
I could have just as easily written it about Hillary Clinton.
Or most Democrat politicos and celebrties for the last sixteen years.
Basically since George W. Bush (Bush League) won the Republican nomination for President, conservatives and especially Republicans have been called Evil Incarnate. They will destroy civil rights. They will arrest all immigrants. They will force all gays into conversion therapy.
It’s always an emergency. It always requires drastic action NOW this very second.
The words haven’t changed. The Republican nominee is always anti-woman, anti-black, anti-gay, and anti-anything if it sounds bad enough.
At least, that’s what the Democrats say.
Except it’s not the Democrats. It’s the Democrat talking points. And they aren’t true.
Life goes on. The election of Bush League didn’t result in all those terrible things.
The election of Donald Trump won’t either.
So why are there carefully organized protests? Why are streets being blocked? Why is property being destroyed?
Now that is a very good question.
Let’s start with who is paying for and organizing these protests. Much of it comes from MoveOn.org. And most of the money from that comes from George Soros. Soros is a very interesting figure who goes out of his way to manipulate things while operating in the background. He’s funded astroturf groups to accomplish his goals, including campaign finance reform. He has often played one side of the Democrat party against another part.
Now, no one pours millions into something unless they have a clear goal.
Soros will tell you it’s for the greater good, but that is not true. Soros wants to benefit. He wants control and access to politicos. He wants technocrats hopping to his orders. He wants power and profits.
Soros gets that by wedding his corporate and financial interests to government in one of those unholy alliances.
George Soros was a major backer of Hillary Clinton. He’s almost certainly one of those who arranged for Clinton to be nominated while locking out all other Democrat candidates. The Soros connections to the Clintons go back to WJC’s Presidency.
Yes, that happened. Look at the Podesta emails.
Major figures in the Democrat party have worked with Soros over the decades. He’s been a major behind the scenes influence cutting deals with the Democrat leadership.
These deals have not been for the people. These deals haven’t even been for the Democrat rank and file.
These deals expanded George Soros power and wealth while protecting him from prosecution and competition.
Soros has spent heavily and gotten government backed privilege at the expense of the common man.
Meanwhile, the “little people” that the Democrats are pledged to help have been locked into poverty and helplessness for generations.
Every government benefit that you accept takes away your freedom.
This is an unholy alliance designed to keep poor people poor and less than human. Always dependent on The Man.
Well, George Soros is The Man.
Millions of middle class and upper class Democrats, convinced that they have to “do something to help NOW,” take their marching orders from community agitators and politicos paid by George Soros.
These “protests” distract attention from Soros. These “protests” blame Republicans. These “protests” spread lies and misinformation. These “protests” keep you from the truth.
So why are you still involved?
Understand, protesting is not the problem. It’s protected under the First Amendment. Nationally organized disruptions that damage or destroy, that’s the problem.
These “protests” were never about the election. They are about keeping people scared. Scared enough to demand government action. Scared enough to sacrifice freedom and liberty.
Ask questions. Ask yourself who benefits. Ask yourself if you really trust people who have been lying to you for years.
Ask yourself if you want to live that way.
Little victories
I hang out and comment at The Wild Hunt. It used to be a pagan news site, now it’s more of an opinion site with occasional news.
Anyway, this article covered pagan reaction to the American election. Scroll down in the comments to the one from Jim. Sometimes TWH deletes comments that are abusive. Although TWH hasn’t politically objectionable comments yet, this has been a strange year.
I don’t have permission to quote Jim’s comment and I am not going to ask for it. The act of asking would make it a much bigger thing than it is. Jim probably doesn’t know I have a political blog and he might be appalled at some things I support.
But by all the gods it’s great to see a modern liberal take on political correctness.
I’ve seen the same trends Jim has seen only I think it goes back to 2000 and the election of George W. Bush. I’ve written about the True Believers on the left before and the trend I saw then.
So Jim has had his say and maybe some folks will take a harder look at themselves. Maybe TWH moderators will keep the comment.
Little victories can lead to big thoughts.
It was a joke?!
“The War Prayer”
It was a time of great and exalting excitement. The country was up in arms, the war was on, in every breast burned the holy fire of patriotism; the drums were beating, the bands playing, the toy pistols popping, the bunched firecrackers hissing and spluttering; on every hand and far down the receding and fading spread of roofs and balconies a fluttering wilderness of flags flashed in the sun; daily the young volunteers marched down the wide avenue gay and fine in their new uniforms, the proud fathers and mothers and sisters and sweethearts cheering them with voices choked with happy emotion as they swung by; nightly the packed mass meetings listened, panting, to patriot oratory with stirred the deepest deeps of their hearts, and which they interrupted at briefest intervals with cyclones of applause, the tears running down their cheeks the while; in the churches the pastors preached devotion to flag and country, and invoked the God of Battles beseeching His aid in our good cause in outpourings of fervid eloquence which moved every listener.
It was indeed a glad and gracious time, and the half dozen rash spirits that ventured to disapprove of the war and cast a doubt upon its righteousness straightway got such a stern and angry warning that for their personal safety’s sake they quickly shrank out of sight and offended no more in that way.
Sunday morning came — next day the battalions would leave for the front; the church was filled; the volunteers were there, their young faces alight with martial dreams — visions of the stern advance, the gathering momentum, the rushing charge, the flashing sabers, the flight of the foe, the tumult, the enveloping smoke, the fierce pursuit, the surrender!
Then home from the war, bronzed heroes, welcomed, adored, submerged in golden seas of glory! With the volunteers sat their dear ones, proud, happy, and envied by the neighbors and friends who had no sons and brothers to send forth to the field of honor, there to win for the flag, or, failing, die the noblest of noble deaths. The service proceeded; a war chapter from the Old Testament was read; the first prayer was said; it was followed by an organ burst that shook the building, and with one impulse the house rose, with glowing eyes and beating hearts, and poured out that tremendous invocation:
God the all-terrible! Thou who ordainest,
Thunder thy clarion and lightning thy sword!
Then came the “long” prayer. None could remember the like of it for passionate pleading and moving and beautiful language. The burden of its supplication was, that an ever-merciful and benignant Father of us all would watch over our noble young soldiers, and aid, comfort, and encourage them in their patriotic work; bless them, shield them in the day of battle and the hour of peril, bear them in His mighty hand, make them strong and confident, invincible in the bloody onset; help them crush the foe, grant to them and to their flag and country imperishable honor and glory —
An aged stranger entered and moved with slow and noiseless step up the main aisle, his eyes fixed upon the minister, his long body clothed in a robe that reached to his feet, his head bare, his white hair descending in a frothy cataract to his shoulders, his seamy face unnaturally pale, pale even to ghastliness. With all eyes following him and wondering, he made his silent way; without pausing, he ascended to the preacher’s side and stood there waiting. With shut lids the preacher, unconscious of his presence, continued his moving prayer, and at last finished it with the words, uttered in fervent appeal, “Bless our arms, grant us the victory, O Lord and God, Father and Protector of our land and flag!”
The stranger touched his arm, motioned him to step aside — which the startled minister did — and took his place. During some moments he surveyed the spellbound audience with solemn eyes, in which burned an uncanny light; then in a deep voice he said:
“I come from the Throne — bearing a message from Almighty God!” The words smote the house with a shock; if the stranger perceived it he gave no attention. “He has heard the prayer of His servant your shepherd, and will grant it if such be your desire after I, His messenger, shall have explained to you its import — that is to say, its full import. For it is like unto many of the prayers of men, in that it asks for more than he who utters it is aware of — except he pause and think. “God’s servant and yours has prayed his prayer. Has he paused and taken thought? Is it one prayer? No, it is two — one uttered, and the other not. Both have reached the ear of Him who heareth all supplications, the spoken and the unspoken. Ponder this — keep it in mind. If you would beseech a blessing upon yourself, beware! lest without intent you invoke a curse upon your neighbor at the same time. If you pray for the blessing of rain on your crop which needs it, by that act you are possibly praying for a curse on some neighbor’s crop which may not need rain and can be injured by it.
“You have heard your servant’s prayer — the uttered part of it. I am commissioned by God to put into words the other part of it — that part which the pastor — and also you in your hearts — fervently prayed silently. And ignorantly and unthinkingly? God grant that it was so! You heard the words ‘Grant us the victory, O Lord our God!’ That is sufficient. The whole of the uttered prayer is compact into those pregnant words. Elaborations were not necessary. When you have prayed for victory you have prayed for many unmentioned results which follow victory — must follow it, cannot help but follow it. Upon the listening spirit of God fell also the unspoken part of the prayer. He commandeth me to put it into words. Listen!
“Lord our Father, our young patriots, idols of our hearts, go forth into battle — be Thou near them! With them — in spirit — we also go forth from the sweet peace of our beloved firesides to smite the foe. O Lord our God, help us tear their soldiers to bloody shreds with our shells; help us to cover their smiling fields with the pale forms of their patriot dead; help us to drown the thunder of the guns with the shrieks of their wounded, writhing in pain; help us to lay waste their humble homes with a hurricane of fire; help us to wring the hearts of their unoffending widows with unavailing grief; help us to turn them out roofless with their little children to wander unfriended in the wastes of their desolated land in rags and hunger and thirst, sports of the sun flames in summer and the icy winds of winter, broken in spirit, worn with travail, imploring thee for the refuge of the grave and denied it —
For our sakes who adore Thee, Lord, blast their hopes, blight their lives, protract their bitter pilgrimmage, make heavy their steps, water their way with their tears, stain the white snow with the blood of their wounded feet!
We ask it, in the spirit of love, of Him Who is the Source of Love, and Who is the ever-faithful refuge and friend of all that are sore beset and seek His aid with humble and contrite hearts. Amen.
(After a pause.) “Ye have prayed it; if ye still desire it, speak! The messenger of the Most High waits.”…
It was believed afterward that the man was a lunatic, because there was no sense in what he said.
NeoNotes — Religious discrimination
The last thing I'm writing about the 2016 election
Tiny houses banned
Tiny Homes Banned in U.S. at Increasing Rate as Govt Criminalizes Sustainable Living
❝❝As the corporatocracy tightens its grip on the masses – finding ever more ways to funnel wealth to the top – humanity responds in a number of ways, including the rising popularity of tiny houses.
These dwellings, typically defined as less than 500 square feet, are a way for people to break free of mortgages, taxes, utility bills and the general trappings of “stuff.” They’re especially attractive to millennials and retirees, or those seeking to live off-grid.
But government and corporations depend on rampant consumerism and people being connected to the grid.
Seeking actual freedom through minimalist living should seem like a natural fit for the American dream, but the reality is that many governments around the country either ban tiny homes or force them to be connected to the utility grid.❞❞
See if they do
Celebs who said they’d leave country if Trump won
Bryan Cranston. Samuel L. Jackson. Lena Dunham. Neve Campbell. Cher. Miley Cyrus. Ne-Yo. Amy Schumer. Chelsea Handler. Jon Stewart. Whoopi Goldberg. Keegan-Michael Key. George Lopez. Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Al Sharpton.Meanwhile, Shervin Pishevar wants to turn California into an independent country.
Now I am not noting this because I support Trump.
I don’t think these people have the character and honor to do what they say they will do.
Hollywood celebrities always freak out when a conservative is elected. Trump is no conservative, but they are after the publicity. They won’t leave the country, this is where they get paid.
NeoNotes — Again
“Because FREEDOM demands more than just black or white”
Grow a lot faster
Memo To The Next President: We Can Grow A Lot Faster
❝❝The idea that there is some kind of inevitable decline in productivity, he says, is nonsense: "Experience and formal analysis tell us clearly that innovation and productivity happen where there is rule of law, simple and predictable regulation, property rights, reasonable taxation, an open and competitive economy, and decent public infrastructure," Cochrane wrote recently. "These politicians do have ample control over, and ample opportunity to screw up."
Presidents, working with Congress, can have an enormous impact on the things that matter.
So what matters? A kind of consensus is emerging among some economists that significant barriers to growth exist — and that they can be swept away. Doing so could push the long-term growth path back above 3% -- creating millions of new jobs and higher incomes at the same time.❞❞
Roaming Millennial on Social Justice and Universities
Nativists threatened by success
“Alt-Right Nativists Launch Witch Hunt Against Chobani Yogurt Founder For Helping Refugees”
Read More...Theodore Roosevelt on immigration
““In the first place, we should insist that if the immigrant who comes here in good faith becomes an American and assimilates himself to us, he shall be treated on an exact equality with everyone else, for it is an outrage to discriminate against any such man because of creed, or birthplace, or origin. But this is predicated upon the person's becoming in every facet an American, and nothing but an American ... There can be no divided allegiance here. Any man who says he is an American, but something else also, isn't an American at all. We have room for but one flag, the American flag ... We have room for but one language here, and that is the English language ... and we have room for but one sole loyalty and that is a loyalty to the American people.””
— Theodore Roosevelt, 1907
“Parliament is sovereign.”
This classic 1867 piece has lessons for today.
For length reasons, this entry has it's own page.
Read More...“If Congress was your co-worker” starring Chris Pine
“Not Yours to Give”
Rigging against the voters
Government & religion
❝❝Religion cannot be allowed the coercive power of government. Government cannot be allowed the moral justification of religion.❞❞
— NeoWayland, United We Stand
Is this real?
Russia gets attention
What a mess
How dare the FBI investigate her
Eight
❝❝Here’s the real point, though. Eight is plenty. In fact, it may just be perfect. For the Supreme Court to take action, there needs to be a clear mandate. That’s an opinion, but it’s one that should make sense to any Constitutional conservative. With nine (or any odd number of) justices, actions for or against a ruling are essentially mandated automatically. That’s not how it should be. With eight, particularly if the justices are split between “conservative” and “liberal” ideologies, a true mandate would require that at least one justice changes sides.❞❞
— JD Rucker, Eight is enough… justices
Stars above and Earth below, I wish I’d thought of that!
It follows with my Four amendments post. The default should be no action without a clear mandate. There is absolutely no reason why each case should be decided one way or the other. Liberty demands more than black and white! Justice over process!
I love when my personal beliefs are verified by someone else’s logic coming from a different direction.
Addendum: Although I did not put this specific post up on reddit, I did put the original link. Someone pointed out that the U.S. Code does specify a Chief Justice and eight associate justices. I think that falls back to the assumptions that I pointed out in my Four amendments post. Just as electing someone shouldn’t be the default, having the court make a decision shouldn’t be the default. Government should be the last solution, not the first, third, fifth, sixth, and last.
Addendum 2: From the official history with emphasis added by me.
The Supreme Court of the United States and the Federal Judiciary❝❝Article III of the Constitution places the judicial power of the federal government in "one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts" as the Congress might decide to establish. The Constitution grants the Supreme Court original jurisdiction in cases in which states are a party and those involving diplomats, but leaves for Congress to determine the size and responsibilities of the Court that is the capstone of the federal judiciary. The Judiciary Act of 1789 established a Supreme Court with one chief justice and five associate justices. The act further defined the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court to include appellate jurisdiction in larger civil cases and cases in which state courts ruled on federal statutes. Congress required the justices of the Supreme Court to preside with the local federal judges on the U.S. circuit courts that met in judicial districts throughout the nation, thus insuring that members of the highest court would participate in the principal trial courts of the federal judiciary and be familiar with the procedures of the state courts.
The size of the Supreme Court grew to accommodate the establishment of new circuits as the nation expanded. In 1807 a seventh justice was added to the court, and in 1837 an eighth and ninth justice joined the Supreme Court. The size of the Court reached its highest point in 1863 with the creation of a Tenth Circuit on the west coast and the appointment of a tenth justice. In 1866, Congress reduced the size of the Court to seven justices and provided that no vacant seats be filled until that number was reached. The number of sitting justices fell to eight before an act of 1869 provided for nine justices, one for each of the judicial circuits established in 1866. The size of the Court has since remained the same.
The duties of circuit riding required the Supreme Court justices to spend most of their time traveling and prompted recurrent efforts to reduce or eliminate this responsibility. In 1793, Congress reduced the number of justices required to hold circuit court from two to one. In the Judiciary Act of 1801, Congress created separate circuit judgeships and freed the justices from any circuit court duties, but this exemption was short-lived. In 1802 Congress again assigned the justices to serve on the U.S. circuit courts, although it allowed the district judge to preside alone in some instances. The establishment of separate circuit judgeships in 1869 further relieved the circuit obligations of the justices. When Congress abolished the circuit courts in 1911, it finally made the justices’ circuit duty optional.❞❞
The actual number is up to Congress and it has been both odd and even. Interesting. I’ve learned some good things today.
The size of the Supreme Court grew to accommodate the establishment of new circuits as the nation expanded. In 1807 a seventh justice was added to the court, and in 1837 an eighth and ninth justice joined the Supreme Court. The size of the Court reached its highest point in 1863 with the creation of a Tenth Circuit on the west coast and the appointment of a tenth justice. In 1866, Congress reduced the size of the Court to seven justices and provided that no vacant seats be filled until that number was reached. The number of sitting justices fell to eight before an act of 1869 provided for nine justices, one for each of the judicial circuits established in 1866. The size of the Court has since remained the same.
The duties of circuit riding required the Supreme Court justices to spend most of their time traveling and prompted recurrent efforts to reduce or eliminate this responsibility. In 1793, Congress reduced the number of justices required to hold circuit court from two to one. In the Judiciary Act of 1801, Congress created separate circuit judgeships and freed the justices from any circuit court duties, but this exemption was short-lived. In 1802 Congress again assigned the justices to serve on the U.S. circuit courts, although it allowed the district judge to preside alone in some instances. The establishment of separate circuit judgeships in 1869 further relieved the circuit obligations of the justices. When Congress abolished the circuit courts in 1911, it finally made the justices’ circuit duty optional.❞❞
Berkeley cry bully bridge protest
UK economy grows after Brexit
“UK economy grows 0.5% in three months after Brexit vote”
The article is boring, but the headline sums it up nicely.
Economies grow when government interference is reduced.
Governments can’t negotiate free trade.
Just remember those.
Four amendments
At this point, I’m honestly not sure it can be saved.
I’m not sure it should be saved.
There are some ideas I have been playing with the last few years or so. I’ve tried to talk these out with people I trust. And now I am putting them here. All are Constitutional amendments.
Remember that the Constitution was designed to restrain the actions of government, not citizens. Remember too that many of the checks and balances have been removed over the years. And finally, the Federal government was never intended to run smoothly and efficiently. The checks and balances were designed to protect freedom.
Liberty is the goal, not democracy.
• Repeal the 16th Amendment
The income tax is one of the biggest threats to freedom ever enacted. With it, the Federal government assumes you are guilty unless you can prove that you are not. This is a complete reversal of the rule of law prior to the amendment.With the 16th, the Federal government is not restrained by the need for a warrant. Your employer, your bank, any financial company that you do business with, all are required by law to report transactions over a specific amount or any “suspicious activity.” There are “rewards” if other citizens turn you in. Effectively, everyone around you is required to spy on you and penalized if they do not.
Tax cases are heard in an administrative court run by the Internal Revenue Service with it’s own rules of evidence. Your money and property can be seized and the only way you can get it back (less interest) is to prove that the IRS is wrong by it’s own regulations. Regulations that are so complex that it is literally beyond the ability of any one person to understand.
The “progressive” tax system is designed to foster envy and “class” disruption. The income tax is one of the most despised Federal laws in American history. The only thing that keeps Americans from hanging IRS agents is that citizens think the “system” hits someone else worse. It fosters scapegoats so it seems “fair.”
An income tax system inevitably leads to political corruption. Unpopular groups find themselves under extra scrutiny. Politicos use it to keep their enemies and rivals in line.
There are technicalities that I could spend pages and pages examining. For example, if there is a “standard deduction,” then by definition taxes are too high.
The income tax took away your freedom. You have to acknowledge this every year by signing a Federal form. Under penalty of law.
• Repeal the 17th Amendment
Brought to you by the same merry madcaps who gave us the 16th, the 17th Amendment reduces freedom in the name of popular democracy. The 17th has made Senators political bosses in their own states, with control of the Federal money spigot and a guaranteed spot high up in the political parties.The popular election of Senators took away some of the oversight the state legislatures were supposed to have on Congress. But since Senators no longer answer to their state legislature, they have become tools of their party.
This does not serve freedom.
This part of popular democracy destroys freedom. It’s an illusion designed to expand the major political parties while fooling the voter into thinking that they have influence.
There’s a place for popular democracy, but not unrestrained popular democracy. The Bill of Rights is the best example.
• None of the Above and Alternative Voting
Every election should have a None of the Above choice. If NOTA won, then those candidates on the ballot would be barred from serving in that office for that term.One choice that people should always have is the choice to walk away.
We should never assume that the default is to elect someone. Especially if the voters aren’t picking who gets to run.
Alternative voting just means ranking the candidates in order of your favorites. The biggest advantage is that the minority candidates have a better chance of being elected and major parties are forced to pay closer attention to all the voters. Instead of voting against a bad candidate, voters could choose someone closer to their beliefs and priorities.
• Laws and Regulations
As things stand now, there will always be more laws and regulations unless Congress takes direct action. Think about that carefully.The default state of the American Federal government is more government.
That is not freedom.
I suggest a three pronged attack.
First, ALL government regulations would sunset within three years unless made law by Congress and the President.
Second, state legislatures would approve Federal regulation before it applies in that state. This approval could be withdrawn at any time. Congress has the power and authority to pass laws for the nation, but it can’t delegate that power. Every single Federal regulation that governs individuals and states is unconstitutional.
This would reduce Federal regulation to it’s proper scope and shift coercive power away from millions of unelected technocrats.
I know this seems excessive, but it is actually well within Constitutional principles. There’s nothing in the Constitution that provides for regulatory agencies except the much abused and overused commerce clause. Certainly there is nothing that provides for administrative court systems outside the Federal courts.
Third, each state legislature could choose one Federal law annually for referendum at the next Congressional election. Each Congressional election, there could be up to 100 Federal laws on the ballot. And if a law does not get a national majority voting to retain it, it would be gone.
Practically, this would effectively be automatic repeal. Unless it was a very good idea, I can’t see a majority voting to keep a law. But the possibility is there. The automatic repeal means that Congress would have to convince voters of the worth of each and every law. And if the state legislatures are canny, one carefully chosen law could defang dozens of others.
In other words, this proposal gives the states direct oversight of Congress.
There are other things that I would love to see done. But these four would do wonders. I welcome your comments and ideas.
Politico elites lie
Rigged? In What Way Is This Election NOT Rigged?
❝❝The political and media elites are outraged beyond measure by Donald Trump’s charge that the election could be rigged. How dare he suggest such a thing, they say, for the system is as honest as the day is long!
It shows he knows he is going to lose, they say. It shows that he has no faith in the American system, and is really a fascist at heart.
In reality, it shows no such thing, but it does show that a conversation about whether this election -- and the political system in general -- is rigged is one that the elites most desperately do not want to have.
And that is why we must have it.
And, if we’re going to have it in an honest fashion, the question should be framed not as “Is the system rigged?” but as “In what way is the system not rigged?”❞❞
Donald Trump’s one merit in this election is that he is the system breaker.
No matter who is elected, no matter who wins the inevitable court case challenging the election, the two major political parties are done.
Finished.
There is nothing that can save them now.
Hillary Clinton’s machinations and betrayals are set out for all to see. The Democrat elites helped her shut out all competition. We don’t know exactly why. It certainly wasn’t because of her accomplishments. The takeaway is that the DNC elites can’t be trusted.
The RNC elites are gunning for Trump. He wasn’t supposed to win. The fix was in. The takeaway is that the RNC elites can’t be trusted.
Do you understand yet?
The takeaway is the the elites can’t be trusted.
Government is not your friend.
A government smaller than absolutely necessary.
These are the things you should remember.
Hang onto your freedom.
HT Bookworm.
3 Rules for Rulers video
Voters don't want
Ideas
Wrong
NeoNotes — Shame game
I suspect that sexual orientation is not as hard wiblurb as some believe, but that is still individual choice.
Read More...Wrong lizard
❝❝...On its world, the people are people. The leaders are lizards. The people hate the lizards and the lizards rule the people."
"Odd," said Arthur, "I thought you said it was a democracy."
"I did," said Ford. "It is."
"So," said Arthur, hoping he wasn't sounding ridiculously obtuse, "why don't people get rid of the lizards?"
"It honestly doesn't occur to them," said Ford. "They've all got the vote, so they all pretty much assume that the government they've voted in more or less approximates to the government they want."
"You mean they actually vote for the lizards?"
"Oh yes," said Ford with a shrug, "of course."
"But," said Arthur, going for the big one again, "why?"
"Because if they didn't vote for a lizard," said Ford, "the wrong lizard might get in."❞❞
Sort of sums it all up, doesn't it?
When both choices are bad, and the system locks out any other choice, then why participate? The system is fixed.
It's fixed against you.
NeoNotes — Sexuality & society
Most of the problems caused by illegal drugs come from the drugs being illegal in the first place.
Read More...NeoNotes — College & university
I don't like either candidate. I don't trust either candidate. And I definitely don't trust the two major parties.
Read More...Roaming Millennial
2016 Election
I don't like either candidate. I don't trust either candidate. And I definitely don't trust the two major parties.
Read More...NeoNotes — Sin
All things being equal, the side that can't stand dissent is usually wrong.
Many many, times.
It doesn't stop it from being true.
I'm not fond of the Republicans or the Democrats. But right now, the Republicans aren't demanding that we break the system and submit to their demands.
So here it is, plain and simple.
If you advocate violence, if you aren't willing to work within the system, you aren't entitled. You don't get respect unless you are willing to give respect.
I don't care what you feel. I don't care how right you believe you are. No one person has all the answers. No group has all the solutions.
And NO ONE has the right to impose their views by force. We agree on the rules or we have nothing.
There's no reason to respect you unless you respect others.
Even the ones you disagree with.
Pinned to the top until further notice.
NeoNotes — Control
NeoNotes — Homosexuality wasn't illegal
❝❝I'm too tired to play by the rules tonight, so I will lay it out.
Homosexuality wasn't illegal. It wasn't legalized. Certain homosexual acts were illegal, but not the status itself. What's more, you don't want homosexuality made illegal because it will become much more popular and any government that can make homosexuality illegal can also make heterosexuality illegal. All it takes is the right politicos in the right places. There's a long convoluted argument for both of those points, but I'm too tired to condense things right now.
Despite your personal beliefs, homosexuality is not the issue. It's the distraction.
Yes, the distraction. It's the pink pantaloons and bared breasts and freaky tattoos. It's all designed to make you nervous, to make you clutch your Bible harder, and maybe even make you froth at the mouth.
It's the distraction.
Because if you're convinced that homosexuality is the issue, you fight a war that cannot be won.
You cannot outlaw homosexuality. You can only try to outlaw sexual behavior you don't like. But Americans have this habit ignoring laws they think are stupid.
I tell people all the time that the people who pay attention to gun laws aren't the ones you should worry about.
The same thing applies here.
The real issue is completely different.
Tax money is going to endorse and encourage one set of behaviors over all others.
That's it.
While the distraction captures your attention, they're picking your pocket to do things for your own good.
Whether you agreed or not.
It's for your own good.
How dare you question!!!
You want to win the battle?
Take away that government support.
Let the free market of ideas work.
If people want to study, fine. But no subsidies. People will have to pay.
And by the way, the same goes for the ideas you agree with.
If people want to study, fine. But no subsidies. People will have to pay.
Yes, there will be ideas taught that you don't like. But those ideas will have no artificial advantage.
The only measure left will be which ideas work in real life.❞ class="ghoster">❞
NeoNotes are the selected comments that I made on other boards, in email, or in response to articles where I could not respond directly.
❞❞
❝❝
NeoNotes — The real "for their own good"
❝❝I'm libertarian. If I had my way, the government would be much smaller and not pushing either a progressive agenda or a conservative one. I'm convinced that a big reason WHY this is happening now is because conservatives built the Big Institutions to keep things working Their Way™ and progressives took them over for the exact same reason.
I don't believe the answer is in who gets to call the shots.
I think the solution is stopping people from meddling with other people's lives so that those other people HAVE to take responsibility for their own choices.
Because that's the real 'for their own good.'❞ class="ghoster">❞
NeoNotes are the selected comments that I made on other boards, in email, or in response to articles where I could not respond directly.
❞❞
❝❝
NeoNotes - I'm not the smartest guy in the room
Since I just spent forty-five minutes writing it as a post, you’re damn right I’m going to put it here.
Read More...Libertarianism for Beginners
❝A century ago in the U.S., government at all levels took up about 8 percent of the economy. Now it takes up about 40 percent. It regulates everything from the size of beverage containers to what questions must not be asked in job interviews.
How can people be expected to keep up with it all?
Seavey points out that it's backward to expect them to try. Instead of just looking at the complicated mess government makes, we need to review the basic rules that got us here.
Instead of the rule being "government knows best" or "vote for the best leader," says Seavey, what if the basic legal rules were just: no assault, no theft, no fraud? Then most waste and bureaucracy that we fight about year after year wouldn't exist in the first place.
To most people, it sounds easier to leave big policy decisions—about complex things like wages, food production and roads—to government. Having to make our own decisions about everything and trade for everything in the marketplace sounds complicated.❞
Both the review and the book are worth your time.
Scam - not the IRS
Flag in my yard
It's a service I'm happy to pay for. The Scouts do it for all the national hollidays.
And I don't have to worry about maintaining a flag.
I'd probably think differently if it was a commerical enterprise. But it's the Boy Scouts, so of course I approve.
Kafkatrap
NeoNotes — Emotional connections
Bad ideas
corporatism
❝A politico-economic system in which most power is held by large corporations, often mistakenly called capitalism. This is the current governing system of most of the world❞
➣ www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=corporatismIf your business model depends on government intervention, you'll ignore the "customer" and focus on manipulating and controlling the government. That's how to get a bigger profit under corporatism.
corporate social responsibility
❝economic, legal, ethical, and discretionary expectations with society has of it's corporations and institutions at any given point in time❞
➣ www.academia.edu/419517/Corporate_Social_Responsibility_Evolution_of_a_Definitional_ConstructAs hard as it may be for some to believe, corporations have absolutely zero social responsibility. A corporation is responsible to it's shareholders first and last. The way that a company keeps and makes more customers is by selling what the people want in a way that is equal to or maybe a bit better than the competition. That brings more profit which means the owners are happy. Anything else is literally the price of doing business.
Companies don't care, people should. If you don't like what a company sells or how it does business, go to the competition. Under no circumstances should you get government to make a company do what you want. That leads to corporatism, and that means neither the government nor the company has any reason to listen to the likes of you.
There are three rules that companies should keep in mind. If done right, following these rules can put a company in the top twenty percent.A company is responsible to it's ownership. Customers are the ones who pay the bills. Sometimes the real customer is the government, see corporatism.
- Competition keeps us honest.
- Always do what you promised.
- Try to deliver more than you promised.
Just some things to think about.
p.s. It looks WAY better on the other site.
Apple patented blocking smartphone cameras
Take this Apple patent. An IR sensor receives a coded signal and disables the camera on a smart phone. Now at first glance, this might frustrate customers at concerts but it would make artists and music publishers happy. It's a tradeoff and customers will learn to accept it for their own good. After all, this is Apple we're talking about here.
Except, not quite.
Apple is usually about what the customer wants. Sometimes they goof. And sometimes Apple has to make compromises to get their product out there. It usually works out well.
Kinda. Sorta. Maybe.
Apple is saying that it could be used to block concerts. But not just concerts. Sensitive events.
This time I can see some damn scary possibilities. And not just me. Also here and here (HT to Daring Fireball for those last two).
It turns out that police can be very critical and aggressive when citizens film what police do. A Federal judge has ruled that filming police is not protected by the First Amendment. Yep. Police can seize your phone, even when you film them breaking the law. The are ways that could make the situation easier, but it's already tense. A little prep can go a long way here.
But if the police turn on a IR gizmo that disables your camera, then they don't have to deal with you. If this technology is introduced, do you really think police departments and Federal agencies won't find a reason to use it?
And of course it's for your own good. And public safety.
We already have agencies regularly abusing or ignoring FOIA requests in direct violation of the law. Now imagine Federal buildings and offices with the IR gizmo permanently installed and permanently on. How long do you think it will take state and local agencies to do the same thing?
And politicos? Hillary Clinton is famous for banning reporters from her campaign. She gives speeches where the press is closed out.
The two national parties have have designated "free speech" areas away from the action during the last few nominating conventions.
How easy it will be to put up the IR gizmos and not worry about any embarrassing videos on YouTube?
Of course the major news organizations will have exemptions. For the good of the nation, you see. Just because the news will be more spoon-fed when there aren't a bunch of angry citizens questioning the Official Story® with their own footage, well, that shouldn't be an issue, should it? The press will always look out for the little guy, right?
So don't complain, Citizen, this is for your own good. It's for the Nation. It's for security. It's for the American Spirit. It's for your freedom. Your own government will tell you so.
Relax Citizen, it won't hurt.
Much.
And after a while, you won't even notice.
Maybe I am overreacting.
The patent is real. The rest is speculation.
So far.
Christina Hoff Sommers and Camille Paglia
Catastrophe or Opportunity
““The sky is not falling, and when the dust settles, Britain's decision may very well prove to be a pivotal event in the reshaping of global relationships and trade that will, in the final analysis, benefit all of us.””
— Gary Johnson, You Can Look at Brexit as a ‘Catastrophe’ or an ‘Opportunity’
Ali was cool
Get that? The science is settled. Don't question the dogma. Thou shalt not dissent!
Read More...NeoNotes — Competition and progress
The party system controls who runs for office & stops the public from interfering
Read More...The Peanuts Movie
The system is rigged
The party system controls who runs for office & stops the public from interfering
Read More...Local power
NeoNotes — Reciprocity
❝❝Pardon, but that’s not necessarily true. Aside from the obvious “Might makes right,” it’s also possible to build a moral system based on the Ethic of Reciprocity.
I'd argue that in peacetime, there are very few times that reciprocity doesn't apply, at least in the long term. You want to screw with the people around you, they will remember and be less likely to deal with you in the future. (There was a great Bill Whittle essay on this that I used to point people at, but it's not online anymore).
❝What is the origin of those rules?❞
That is a great question. The practical part of me would ask does it matter as long as the rules work?
Not just Christianity.
❝In our opinion, the greatest failure of many organized religions is their historical inability to convince their followers that the Ethic of Reciprocity applies to all humans, not merely to fellow believers like themselves. It is our group's belief that religions should stress that their members also use their Ethic of reciprocity when dealing with persons of other religions, other genders, other cultures, other sexual orientations, other gender identities, etc. Only when this is accomplished will religiously-related oppression, mass murder and genocide cease.
Crimes against humanity require that the victims first be viewed as subhuman and the as not worthy of life. If the Ethic of Reciprocity is applied to all humans, then no person or group of persons can be seen in this way.❞
The whole point of that quote was that many organized religions use an ethic of reciprocity but do not extend their definition of people to members of other religions. In other words, the "elect" have privileges (and implied Wisdom™) that "mere unbelievers" do not.
Reread the quote.
We have one race and that's human. If it's really about reciprocity, we're obligated to recognize the worth of others.
And if someone doesn't believe in your eternal judge, don't you face the exact same questions?
It's not my place to say if your God exists or if He may judge you or indeed if He cares what color shirt you will wear next Saturday. That's between you and Him.
Likewise, it's not your place to say the same thing about my gods.
Which means the only things we have to build a society and culture on are the things we have in common. If that's not going to be a shared belief in a specific aspect of Divinity, what's left?
"Do unto others as you would have them do unto you."
Or my preferred version "Be excellent to each other. And party on, Dudes!"
❝I'm asking about how, absent a transcendent signifier, anything means anything.❞
I can't answer that for you. I don't believe anyone can answer that for another person.
If you believe, there's no doubt that will shape your thoughts and actions. If you believe in a different Divine aspect, that will shape your thoughts and actions differently. If you don't believe, your actions will still be shaped by belief.
It's a question of faith. We may not share faith. Does that mean we can't share a culture or a society?
I was updating one of my blogs and I ran across an entry from this site that I made. I thought it was good so I quoted it on my site a few weeks back. The line also applies here.
❝When it comes to religion becoming the law of the land, the devout don't need it, the non-believers don't want it, and the politicos will corrupt it.❞
I think the mark of an adult is the ability to make the right choice without the threat of punishment. Or perhaps despite it.
We know that's possible. Under the right circumstances, we even revere the people who did that as saints and heroes.
One may also choose to honor it, cherish it, and nourish it.
It's a matter of choice.
So tell me, is morality stronger when one chooses it? Or is it stronger when one holds a gun to another's head and says "Do as I say or else!!!"
Isn't morality really about making a choice?
If it's made under duress, doesn't it cease to be moral?
If morality is really a choice, then people will make choices you do not like. The next question is what do you intend to do about them?
I'm not an atheist.
Again, if it's a choice made under duress, is it really moral?
If morality can only exist by force, what's the point?
I can see your point, if the rules are transcendent, then they are universal.
But if that guy over there doesn't believe the rules are transcendent, then for him they won't be. That's true regardless.
And then you get into the arguments over which particular Deity wrote the rules and what the "civilized people" are going to do with those folks who do not believe.
That's an incredibly dangerous path to take.
One thing I've learned is that when it comes to enforcing morality, it's almost never a god that does it. It's people who claim to to speak for the Divine.
Inevitably, that leads to arguments over which god is in charge. Funny how that leads to political power for a certain priesthood.
Religion is not the reason, it's the justification.
I disagree. I think the core of civilization is cooperation, not force. Positive not punishment.
Although I differ from most libertarians when it comes to the Zero Aggression Principle, I believe that relying on force alone will create disaster.
Is morality transcendent or man-made? That's ultimately unanswerable on anything except a personal level. Practically, it only matters if I can trust you and you can trust me.
A couple of years ago I asked on this site if someone could be a "good" man if they weren't Christian.
I don't think force is a foundation of civilization.
What do I base trust on? Past behavior if I have a history with you. The chance to make things a little better today if I don't.
It's an act of faith. *grins*
You know, we’ve had this discussion before. Somehow, I don’t think either of us has changed our views since then.
Hah! I found it. I misremembered what I wrote. Perhaps the question bears repeating here.
Is the only source of accepted morality Christian?
I'm talking about honoring, cherishing and nourishing a moral philosophy. There's not much subjective about it.
If I don't want to be killed, I shouldn't kill others.
If I don't want to be hurt, I should not hurt others.
If I want nice stuff, I shouldn't take or damage other people's stuff.
The best way I can protect myself is to stand up for others when I can.
This isn't because of some priest hiding behind a sacred text. This is because I live in the World with other people.
I agree with you.
My grandfather's funeral taught me that the measure of a man was how he touched the lives of others.
As a person of faith myself, I believe in the Divine and I do devotions. I believe that reaching beyond ourselves is how we become better and make our world better. It's the Manifestation.
I just don't think that's the only choice.❞ class="ghoster">❞
NeoNotes are the selected comments that I made on other boards, in email, or in response to articles where I could not respond directly.
❞❞
❝❝
NeoNotes — Undermine your own
The most important person you've never heard of
Thirteen thousand
If the U.S. Marshalls arrested 13,000 "worst of the worst," repeat, violent offenders…
Why were there 13,000 "worst of the worst" repeat, violent offenders out there to be arrested?
Rebellion rumbles
I haven't been the only one who noticed. I thought it would happen much sooner. Lately things have been coming to a head.
❝John Hackmann, a Fairview Heights, Ill., retiree, labeled it a “Washington cartel.”
“They just let the government do whatever they want,” said Jim Walker, an Arnold, Mo., businessman.
What is the establishment? Nationally, eight in 10 people told a McClatchy-Morning Consult poll this month it includes members of Congress. Similar numbers cited the Democratic and Republican parties, political donors, Wall Street bankers and the mainstream media.
They split on whether Trump, a billionaire real estate developer who’s thrived in the New York business world, was part of the establishment, but seven in 10 said Democratic front-runner Hillary Clinton was.
In essence, the establishment lives and thrives in a small world that lives and works in New York and Washington, on Wall Street, in Big Media, and in Politics, connected by the high-speed Acela corridor and often by mutual self interest.
Many, perhaps most, do care deeply about the common good though they are anything but common themselves. They hire each other and each other’s children. They huddle at the same white tie and black tie dinners. And, they sometimes attend each other’s weddings.❞
Of course Limbaugh has been going after the establishment too.
Remember, the elites chose Bush and Clinton. Those were the two people who were supposed to get the nomination. It blew up in their faces.
There's only one question left.
One paragraph
Older journalists are being laid off and they aren't entitled to run their crusades
Read More...Avatars
I comment quite a bit on other sites. This picture was my favorite avatar for quite a while. It uses a theta symbol and symbolized one of my favorite concepts. But it was time for a change and I had something else in mind.
A while back I created a category called Thinking By Blogging at Technopagan Yearnings and had used the NW graphic you see. But in light of this piece By Your Own Name, I thought it would be hypocritical to use a personal sigil for that category. I was pushing it with the web address. So I switched to a labyrinth. I meant to use ithe NW sigil as a commenting avatar, but it needed more whitespace to work for Disqus. I just hadn't made the time.
Until now. And I'm getting a couple of nice responses. So instead of going into a side bar explaining on the sites that had noticed, I thought I would waste my own web bandwitdh by explaining.
Aren't you just thrilled?
NeoNotes — Political fringe and crazy ideas
The only point in taking over the world is to make sure people make their own choices
Read More...NeoNotes — Smear
NeoNotes — About the guilt
❝❝First, not all feminists. And not all lesbians.
Now with that out of the way, these particular females (I will not dignify them as ladies) do have a big problem.
It's all about the guilt. If the guys don't feel guilt, there is no way these females will get their way. I for one am tired of it. I've been lectured to about the need for keeping silent when the RadFems are speaking. I've been lectured for pointing out that environmentalism makes no sense while ecology does. I've been lectured for saying #AllLivesMatter. And I have been lectured to when I refused to change my lifestyle because it is not acceptable to feminism.
KYFHO.
I make the same stand against them that I make against some of the conservative Christians. My life is my own. My choices are my own. My responsibility is my own.
Unfortunately, that's not enough for some conservative Christians.
They want to meddle. For the greater good, of course.
And that means taking lives and responsibility away from other people.
If you bother to read my comments, you'll find I don't try to hide what I am saying. After all, I am a pagan libertarian posting openly on a conservative mostly Christian board.
If you had asked me about the "culture wars," I'd tell you that war is the wrong way to think about it. War is backed by force. If you can't convince someone that your way is right without resorting to force, you're doing it wrong.
What you believe isn't important to me. Your freedom to choose what to believe, that is vital. That is what I will defend.❞ class="ghoster">❞
NeoNotes are the selected comments that I made on other boards, in email, or in response to articles where I could not respond directly.
❞❞
❝❝
NeoNotes — On Liberty
❝❝…restricted groups…
Curious choice of phrasing there.
Okay, here's the NeoNotes™ version. In three parts.
Part the First — Labels don't define people, labels describe people. Just because one Democrat orthodontist Mets fan beats his wife and kids does't mean that all Democrats do. Or all orthodontists do. Or all Mets fans do.
It means one person does.
Until you can show that ALL individuals within a group are equally guilty of all crimes, then you can't link group membership to the crime.
"The word is not the thing." "The map is not the territory." The person is not the label.
Not all cancer victims smoke. Not all people wearing pants commit armed robbery. Not all American males like football.
You do not control people by slapping a on a label.
Part the Second — No matter how much you disapprove of someone's behavior and personal life, if it's not against the law it's none of your business.
Remember that last bit.
It's none of your business.
Make it your business for whatever reason, and you open yourself up to people poking in yours.
Depends on the behavior.
Molesting kids, that is against the law and I accept that law as a workable compromise.
Laws against what consenting adults do, well, that is bad law. I don't care if it's a home brewery, scrapbooking, or sex, it's none of your business.
See Part the Third.
The law has no virtue because it is law.
Part the Third — There are limited times ANYTHING should be against the law.
If it doesn't threaten another's person or property, then it probably shouldn't be a law.
Just because your religion says it's not right doesn't mean it should be illegal. Unless you want to be controlled by another's religion.
I think we should compromise and at least try to protect children.
Anything else should be hands off.❞ class="ghoster">❞
NeoNotes are the selected comments that I made on other boards, in email, or in response to articles where I could not respond directly.
This particular thread inspired the name.
❞❞
❝❝
New quotes - updated
NeoNotes — Divine intervention
❝❝Your issue with me isn't about what I say. It's that I don't recognize Christianity as the "obviously superior" choice. It's that I won't give Christianity the hand up you think it deserves. It's that I don't think Christianity is the "universal" choice.NeoNotes are the selected comments that I made on other boards, in email, or in response to articles where I could not respond directly.
Am I attacking you? No. Am I attacking Christianity? No. Am I suppressing Christianity? No.
If Christianity is what you believe, then it should be able to hold it's own AND MORE against any other set of ideas with no special advantage.
Which means there’s no need to explain human behavior because of Divine intervention or devilish activity.
It’s choice.❞❞
NeoNotes — Ordinary
❝❝Most of the ordinary are already great.NeoNotes are the selected comments that I made on other boards, in email, or in response to articles where I could not respond directly.
Even their day to day actions produce wonders.
That orange juice in your fridge and in fridges all over the country? Absolutely wonderful and put there by everyday people doing everyday things.
That smartphone you use? We were barely reaching for it twenty-five years ago. Made possible by ordinary people wanting things just a bit better than they were yesterday.
That food bank downtown? It's only there because some folks decided to make things a little easier for their neighbors.
All great things. All wondrous things. All made possible by ordinary people.❞❞
NeoNotes — American Legacy
❝❝We are a nation of individuals, of individual liberty and responsibilities, of individual choice and individual passion. We're the first nation like that in recorded history, it is our legacy.
Our faiths, like Christianity, are a part of that.
Please think about this. You may believe that your God makes the sun rise, but your faith doesn't control my actions. Likewise, my faith doesn't control you.
We have to find common ground outside religion. Otherwise it's a matter of whose religion is "in charge," and that way will destroy liberty.❞❞
NeoNotes are the selected comments that I made on other boards, in email, or in response to articles where I could not respond directly.
NeoNotes — On Progress
❝❝Progress never comes from satisfaction.
And I am not talking about progressives.
We adapt, we change, we rise to meet the challenges. Life is a journey, not a destination.❞ class="ghoster">❞
NeoNotes are the selected comments that I made on other boards, in email, or in response to articles where I could not respond directly.
❞❞
❝❝
NeoNotes — Not the pagan community
❝❝I'm not speaking for the pagan community. Much of the justification for "establishing" a Greater Pagan Community® is so that certain individuals can get the adoration and deference they believe they deserve.
I believe in ecology but I'm against environmentalism.
I believe individual freedom and personal responsibility works ever so much better than collectivism.
I think that what Christians call the Golden Rule is one of the most important roots of civilization. But I prefer another version, "Be excellent to each other. And party on, dudes!"
Now is that enough of a test, or do I have to give the Super Secret Handshake™ too?❞ class="ghoster">❞
NeoNotes are the selected comments that I made on other boards, in email, or in response to articles where I could not respond directly.
❞❞
❝❝
NeoNotes — On Rape Culture
❝❝I'm not familiar with the work, but we've seen these discussions far too often. Take the allegation that the United States is a "rape culture." Or the notion that anyone who says "all lives matter" instead of "black lives matter" is a racist.
In this specific case, look at the mindsets involved. One wants validation and their demands enshrined in law and regulation. The other wants a better world for them and theirs. Yet both are treated as if the RadFem ideology is dominant.
There are women who consider themselves feminists that think wife and mother is a valid choice and don't want anything to do with the RadFems. But these are not the ladies doing it for attention. They won't be published. They won't be picketing. They won't be giving soundbites for the news or YouTube. That's not how they believe lasting change happens.
Words matter. Actions matter more. Intentions don't.❞ class="ghoster">❞
NeoNotes are the selected comments that I made on other boards, in email, or in response to articles where I could not respond directly.
❞❞
❝❝
NeoNotes — On Christian theocracy
❝❝Anytime someone starts talking about a Christian theocracy, I ask "Which one?"
Besides the obvious differences between Catholics and Protestants, there are differences between the sects. There's no way a Baptist is going to take religious marching orders from a Mormon. The Methodists won't accept directions from the Christian Scientists.
This predates the country. Back in the colonial days, no one wanted a church in one colony dictating religious practices in another. This is partially why there was no national church defined in the Constitution and why the only mention of any god in that document was the date.
The best way to make sure that you're allowed to practice your religion in peace is to make sure EVERYONE has that same right.❞ class="ghoster">❞
NeoNotes are the selected comments that I made on other boards, in email, or in response to articles where I could not respond directly.
NeoNotes — Sex Speculation
❝❝There I admit we get into some speculation. We can't isolate the culture from the genetics. Not to mention that Really Big Assumption that you are either straight OR gay forever and ever, amen.
We can't say how much a person's sexual orientation depends on their conditioning, religious beliefs, cultural standards, rebellion, stress, pain, or pleasure. These factors can't be eliminated.
Basically all we have to work with is observations and we don't know how much is because of the biology and how much is because of the mind. That means in turn that any discussion of sex is going to bog down really quickly in ideas that can't be quantified.
Thank the gods the same can't be said for the act!❞ class="ghoster">❞
NeoNotes are the selected comments that I made on other boards, in email, or in response to articles where I could not respond directly.
❝❝
NeoNotes — Trends
❝❝Perhaps we could just say stuff happens and individuals need to be held responsible.
The trends argument is the same justification that the RadFems use against males in general. You can pick and choose bad examples and ignore the good examples. That way, you never need to talk about individuals, it's about trends and statistics and who is the greater "danger to the community."
Why is it better when conservatives use that justification against whatever Label X is this week?
Until and unless you can show that all of Label X engages in Action Y AND no one who is Not Label X engages in Action Y, the argument falls down. Which means maybe, just maybe we should look at something other than the label.❞ class="ghoster">❞
NeoNotes are the selected comments that I made on other boards, in email, or in response to articles where I could not respond directly.
❝❝
NeoNotes — Dangerous beast
❝❝Perhaps the biggest difference between libertarians and conservatives/progressives is that conservatives and progressives view government as a Way To Get Things Done.
Libertarians see government as an extremely dangerous beast that if kept at all, must be severely hobbled and and three-quarters starved.
For the safety of the community.❞ class="ghoster">❞
NeoNotes are the selected comments that I made on other boards, in email, or in response to articles where I could not respond directly.
❝❝
Twitterfied - updated
But here’s the thing. They make no secret of their opinion. If they think I am wrong, they tell me and they tell me why.
Read More...NeoNotes — No real difference
❝❝Actually there is very little difference between the "leaders" of either party. They don't object to stuff being done, they object to the other "guy" doing it and getting the cblurbit.❞❞
Read More...
Apple stands for rights
The FBI won’t stop at one iPhone.
The FedGovs won’t stop at ten thousand smart phones.
Read More...Cruz goes evangelical
Not all feminists…
Certainly not all women are like that. What we have is a very small group that wants political power and public validation in the worst way. Yes, it’s another case of Those Who Want To Be Noticed.
Read More...
Women in combat
❝❝Speaking only for myself, I want the U.S. armed forces to be the toughest, most capable sons of a gun on the face of the planet. Especially the elite units. I want them to make other national leaders nervous, even if they are half way across the globe. I want whispers in the darkest shadows of just what happens when someone dares threaten freedom if an American serviceman can do something about it.Read More...
Any female who can fill the physical and mental requirements without any allowances for their sex has my respect. All the more so if they show the warrior virtues. But by all the warrior gods they'd better damn well hold their own and more.❞❞
— NeoWayland