Friday - 26Oct2018 Filed in:
Headlines&Free SpeechHeadlines that don't merit their own entry
Not meant to explode. A hoax or a warning? I'm leaning towards hoax.
““A few days ago the creator of the most famous consumer ‘credit score’ in the United States announced a major overhaul in how it rates borrowers.”
Tags: Julian Assange ∙ Ecuador ∙ Britain ∙ politicos ∙ Social Security ∙ hoax ∙ warning ∙ drag show ∙ Catholic ∙ Title IX ∙ ideology ∙ envy ∙ theft ∙ Los Angeles ∙ pensions ∙ bank ∙ Foxconn ∙ eminent domain ∙ European Union ∙ EU ∙ CEI ∙ environment ∙ plastic
Friday - 05Oct2018 Filed in:
Headlines&Politics&Law&Ecology
❝❝You are aware that you just tried to shame me into keeping quiet and not offer a dissenting opinion, aren't you?
It's only shame if I accept the premise.
I did not deny that discrimination and oppression takes place.
Now, let's look at what I actually did.
I said people had tried to shame and shun me because of my sexuality, faith, and politics.
You know, like you tried to do.
I didn't proclaim my victimhood gave me the power to command others.
You know, like you tried to do.
It's only shame if I accept the premise.
I refuse to give blanket special privilege because of proclaimed victimhood.
If an individual wants help, I'll give what I think I can. If a vague class demands constant unquestioned deference because of some poorly defined list of potential offenses that may have been committed on alternate Tuesdays, I'll probably laugh.
The World needs heroes more than it needs victims.
I despise the politics of victimhood. That always ALWAYS means a hierarchy and oh so carefully deciding who has it worse. It's never about injustice, it's about injustice shown to a particular class. Injustice against other groups gets downplayed if not ignored entirely.
For example, I gave three reasons. You picked sex sexuality. Not just sex sexuality, but sexual politics as it applies to your letter salad. So heterosexual feminists don't rate high on your victim scale. And you treated all those carefully defined letters as One Monolithic Block, as if the needs and desires of the transfolks matched those of the gay bears.
You're not a hero because someone hurt your feelings or didn't give you what you thought you deserved. Heroes overcome adversity.
Yes, you did attempt to shame me. It's kafkatrapping, specifically invoking model A and model C. It was old when Alinsky wrote about it, under a different name of course. The goal of shaming is to morally prevent me from speaking or writing. It attempts to manipulate guilt of both the target and the spectators.
You're right, I don't know you. Nor should what you have experienced have any influence on my behavior. Unless you're expecting my guilty pity to overcome my beliefs and self-interest.
Even now you are ranking comparative victimhood as if that is what defines people. That is what intersectionality does, isn't it? It's all about the victimhood. Emphasizing the victimhood isn't going to do anything except create a pity party. It's not particularly healthy and it isn't a practical solution.
There are radical feminists who routinely try to shame and shun men all the time. Starting with allegations that America is a "rape culture" and that any PIV sex is rape by it's very nature.
You'll never get social justice because people don't agree on what it means.
You obviously don't know me or you'd know that I carefully think about everything I write. I pride myself on it. You have a problem in that my thoughts don't slavishly follow what you think is important.
I've seen people called heroes over hurt feelings. So have you. I've also seen people cashing in on the ordeals of others. So have you.
You chose to respond to my post. I had done you no harm. All I did was challenge your belief. You don't know who I am or what I've done. You don't know who I've helped or who I've hurt. All you know is that you think I should not be allowed to speak or write my opinion.
Pardon, but you're deigning to respond so you can prove a point. You're not doing me any favors and the act comes across a little hollow.
Yes, you did try to shame me. You're not the first or thirteenth or thousandth person to try. You don't get to set the terms of my shame.
Of course I want a better world. What I may not want is a better world on your terms. That's not because of my politics, it's because I'm human.
Yep, I did bring up self-interest because it's a major reason for people's behavior. You're not having this discussion because you're feeling selfless. You've convinced yourself you're doing it for the Greater Good.
Speaking of self-interests, one reason why private alternatives become better, cheaper, and faster is because of competition. A public program doesn't have the incentive to improve so it can keep and get more business. But that is a long subject well beyond the scope of this discussion. I will point out that if something is cheaper and more available, that means that more people can get it if they want it.
I'll also point out that the free market, voluntary transactions between consenting adults, has done more to raise people out of poverty than anything else in history.
Just so you know, I was born on the Navajo reservation and I've spent much of my life near it or the Hopi reservation. I've also lived in Phoenix, Tucson, Los Angeles, Provo, and Albuquerque among other places. I know about "people of color," but mine go beyond your definition.
And that brings us up to women, doesn't it? I knew my first strong woman from before I was born. Your issue here is not that I don't have empathy, it's that I don't have the empathy that you approve of. Actually the radical feminists I was talking about called themselves third and fourth wave. When I can, I regularly seek out people who disagree with me. No one person and certainly no one group has all the answers.
I didn't pass judgement on sexual assault and harassment. I said that power from victimhood is not a good thing and heroes overcome adversity.
You yourself cited the experiences of others to justify fighting injustice. So yes, you're cashing in and you know people who have done so.
You chose to confront my "hypocrisy" but you haven't proven it. It may not match your opinion, but that is a different issue.
By the way, asserting that I have a "privileged position" is kafkatrapping Model P.
Isn't it interesting how you can tell me that my ideas are flawed but you think I can't tell you the same?
Before you proclaim that US Aid is the answer to all the World's problems, you might ask yourself how much of it actually gets through the many corrupt levels of government? That's the essence of libertarianism you see. It's not that we don't care, we just don't see government as an effective way to deliver what needs to be done.
If I see a victim, I don't want them to stay a victim.
I didn't put the web addy up for you. ❞❞
NeoNotes are the selected comments that I made on other boards, in email, or in response to articles where I could not respond directly.
Tags: shame ∙ shame game ∙ competition ∙ Navajo reservation ∙ Phoenix ∙ Provo ∙ Albuquerque ∙ Tucson ∙ Los Angeles ∙ kafkatrap ∙ victimhood ∙ social justice ∙ self interest ∙ empathy
Friday - 02Mar2018 Filed in:
Headlines&Free Markets&PoliticsWhy does government think it can choose someone's religion?
Disturbing
Virtue signaling…again
Chilling. Do you really want Google deciding what you can see on the 'net?
Literally taxes are theft
This is probably seven types of illegal.
Follow the money
Beyond surreal
The SPLC is heavily biased against conservatives, and moderately biased against libertarians
Why we need a free and open internet
Blacks, Hispanics, and women hit hardest
Why should any company be shielded from the taxes that other companies pay?
Yes, it's BuzzFeed which I don't like using as a source. It's also accurate.
Funny how only one side of the debate is hitting the national media
Exaggerating, but not by much
There is very little doubt that this was an attempt to derail an elected President
If the tables were turned, don't you think a business would be shamed into servicing Democrat voters?
What? You mean Brexit was not an isolated event?
“Trump's embrace of gun control is consistent with his views before he ran for president.”
There's no reason voters shouldn't know the details
“San Francisco rent control reduced affected rental housing by 15 percent while boosting citywide rents by 5 percent”
Excellent question
Capitalism holds the roots of freedom
“Telling others to 'get on the right side of history' is not just a form of intellectual bullying.”
Tags: religious tolerance ∙ China ∙ internet ∙ Billings ∙ Donald Trump ∙ homeless ∙ Los Angeles ∙ Second Amendment ∙ Pittsburgh ∙ Amazon ∙ Italy ∙ EU citizens ∙ Euroscepticism ∙ mass migration ∙ Derry ∙ Republican ∙ Democrat ∙ BuzzFeed ∙ gun control ∙ Robert Mueller ∙ Facebook ∙ Southern Poverty Law Center ∙ marijuana ∙ Calaveras County ∙ Google ∙ censorship ∙ Dick’s Sporting Goods ∙ virtue signaling ∙ public schools ∙ Parkland ∙ shooting ∙ Barack Obama
Wednesday - 21Feb2018 Filed in:
Quotes & Thinkums&Law““If you break our laws by entering this country without permission and give birth to a child, we reward that child with U.S. citizenship and guarantee full access to all public and social services this society provides — and that's a lot of services. Is it any wonder that two-thirds of babies born at taxpayer expense (in) county-run hospitals in Los Angeles are born to illegal alien mothers?””
— Senator Harry Reid, Senate floor, 1993
Source : Take The 'Racist Xenophobe' Quiz: Who Said This About Illegal Immigration?
Tags: Harry Reid ∙ 1993 ∙ Senator ∙ Senate ∙ illegal immigrants ∙ child ∙ citizen ∙ public services ∙ Los Angeles ∙ alien mothers ∙ Investors Business Daily
Wednesday - 03Jan2018 Filed in:
Headlines&Politics&Law