NeoNote — The urge to meddle
❝❝Within our borders, absolutely we should have Truth, Justice, and the American way.Read More...
Outside, no. We should be an inspiration, not a hegemony.❞❞
☆ Dear Democrats
I'm not a Trump supporter. I don't like him, I don't trust him, and I don't think he's good for liberty or the country. But I've also been watching the man for a long, long time. There's an exchange in the original Pirates of the Caribbean film.
““You are without doubt the worst pirate I've ever heard of.””
““But you have heard of me.””
And that's where we are, folks. Trump may be the worst president you ever heard of. But you have heard of him. And he plays the press better than almost anyone else on the planet.
Think about it, Trump has made several careers over several decades doing exactly that. He keeps turning bad press into press for his goals. Then he gets most of what he wants. He plays the long shots, more often than not he gets the payoff. Trump has spent his life turning obstacles and adversity into triumphs.
No, I don't like him. No, I don't trust him. But I can't deny Trump's success. The orange hair clown is a distraction. He plays a character to divert your attention, but underneath there is a first class operator and a pretty good executive.
Any of this is obvious to any one who bothered to do the research. That brings us up to just before the 2016 election.
You don't have to take my word for it, do some digging. Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama conspired to make HRC President. I'm not going to go over the shenanigans and rules lawyering that leveled the opposition in their party. It has it's roots in the superdelegates, and you don't need my instructions on how to clean your own house.
But HRC decided to go one step further. She decided that she needed a Republican clown to defeat. She picked Donald Trump. Without doing her homework, she bought into the image that he'd been selling for decades. HRC called in some favors. With Obama's help, Hillary set up a backup plan using ideas that have been very successful for the Democrats in the past. They tried to set up a false narrative that would give Democrats Absolute Moral Authority to denounce Trump and all Republicans for all time.
Or at least for the next eight years.
Yes, you read that right. Hillary Clinton picked Donald Trump to lose the election. And she called in every political marker she had to make sure he got the Republican nomination.
Hillary Clinton did not do her homework. Nobody in her camp did. They forgot that Trump turns adversity into advantage.
This isn't the first time Democrats have relied on false narratives. The Republicans are the party of Lincoln. Republicans were responsible for passing the 1964 Civil Rights Act over strong Democrat opposition. But because Republicans did not give special privilege and recognition to the designated victim class, they were "racist." In the public perception, "equal rights" got redefined into preferential treatment. But only for certain groups.
The later waves of feminism are way too complicated to untangle here. Feminism changed into a variation of the same theme. Preferential treatment AND special privilege on demand and as defined by certain very vocal women who claimed to speak for all. If a Republican politico did not support that instantly and without question, well, naturally they were misogynist and anti-woman. Never mind that the definitions constantly changed, or that the "rights" weren't always practical or even possible. No, certain women had to have what they demanded when they demanded and without consequence. Or the Republicans were keeping women down.
And then there is climate change. I've dealt with it extensively elsewhere. It doesn't use science, it uses the politics of victimhood. And you are not allowed to dissent.
There are other false narratives. But these are big ones from the Democrats. Republicans have their own, but I'm not going into those here.
Since at least the 1970s, Democrats have relied on the The Big Lie to manufacture narratives giving Absolute Moral Authority to denounce Republicans. Sometimes I wonder if the Democrat and progressive elites have forgotten how to do anything else.
And that brings us to the 2016 election aftermath. There was the narrative, Trump had colluded with Russians to steal the election. He was a traitor and a fool. All his supporters were uneducated and unsophisticated saps who Trump had exploited. Surely the virtuous Democrats could prevail against Orange Man Bad.
This time there was a difference. Any Trump watcher could tell you that Trump wasn't a politician. Most especially Trump wasn't the usual Republican politico who avoided political conflict in the name of bipartisanship. He couldn't be shamed or guilted into anything. Go after Trump publicly and he would hit back harder than you ever dreamed. Later he might call you up after and invite you to dinner and drinks, but that was after the hand was played.
This was Trump's background before he was elected.
And after? He was the Chief Executive. He just cleaned house a bit, put the right people in place at the right time, and was patient. He trusted in the American people and the rule of law. That law was on his side. All Trump had to do was the right thing. Talk about irony.
It could have been different if Democrats had gone after Trump for things he actually had done. Eminent domain abuses come to mind.
But no, everything was bet on one spin of the wheel. Democrats forgot that Trump built casinos. A well-run house never loses as long as it obeys the law and doesn't mess with the odds too much. All he had to do was the right thing.
Trump didn't "win" this one because of his virtue. He won this one because he played by the official rules. Not the unspoken rules that Washington has been using, but the actual official ones based in law and the faith of the American people. Because the Democrat elites didn't play by those rules, it gave Trump the Moral Authority to do what comes next. Not Absolute Moral Authority, but none of the Democrat leadership can challenge Trump when he goes after those who tried to take him down. Just for doing his job, Trump is going to be that much stronger in 2020.
So the Democrats are discredited.
If there is one piece of advice I hope you take from this, it's that you need to abandon the false narratives. Be true to your beliefs. By all means call Republicans out for breaking their word, but do the same for your own leadership. Don't look the other way because somebody famous claims to support your goals. Words matter, actions matter more, intentions don't. Don't take their word for it, see what they actually do.
If you are going to claim moral authority, you need to be true to your own morality.
NeoNote — Naturally Good
❝❝As far as I am concerned, you have no business going after Republicans until you at least acknowledge that Democrats aren't perfect and are just as good at messing things up.❞❞Read More...
NeoNote — Wiretapping
❝❝To me, the interesting thing is that most of the mainstream media is willing to ignore things like this so long as it's a Democrat doing it to a Republican.❞❞Read More...
Oversized headline catchup
Mark Penn: FBI Trump-Russia investigation shows deep state was worse than we thought
The Shutdown Is Providing Evidence Of Private Businesses Making Government Obsolete
The shutdown’s real lesson: Government has taken hostage too much of the economy
Political Nightmares Multiply for Europe Ahead of Davos
Feds Can't Force You To Unlock Your iPhone With Finger Or Face, Judge Rules
The Game of Pseudo-Authenticity
Supreme Court to Consider Whether Police Can Order Blood Draws from Unconscious Drivers
Public Disdain For Russia Probe Intensifies, Trump Approval Climbs — IBD/TIPP Poll
Trump's Terrible Record on Property Rights
“The President's recent threat to use "the military version of eminent domain" to seize property for his border wall is just the tip of a larger iceberg of policies and legal positions inimical to constitutional property rights.”California prohibits gender-based auto insurance: report
Ladies, expect your rates to go upDemocrats Failing to Control Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s Green Revolution
If Republicans were smart, they'd keep quiet while the Democrats self-destructSecond Thoughts On Pot
Dems fly to Puerto Rico on chartered jet, meet with lobbyists, see 'Hamilton' as shutdown drags on
Just the Hispanic Caucus.US approved thousands of child bride requests
Oh My: Catholic Archdioceses Admit Wuerl Knew Of McCarrick Abuse Allegation In 2004
Philly residents defy the city’s controversial ‘soda tax’
Inside Facebook’s ‘cult-like’ workplace, where dissent is discouraged and employees pretend to be happy all the time
5 Things To Do About Our Culture’s Antagonism Against Men
Gab Promotes Bitcoin as 'Free Speech Money' to Over 850,000 Users
The Recession Will Be Unevenly Distributed
“Those households, enterprises and organizations that have no debt, a very low cost basis and a highly flexible, adaptable structure will survive and even prosper.”How Facebook Borrows From the NSA Playbook
5 reasons why there’s still no end to the shutdown
“They can’t end the standoff because Democrats and Republicans are trying to solve different problems”The only acceptable answer: “None of your f(ornicating) business!”
Who gave National Review the power to excommunicate?
Employee at Ford Office Fired After Disagreeing With Transgender Post
Majority Preservation Act
“The first House Democratic bill aims to hamstring opponents.”Nobel secretary regrets Obama peace prize
This Reporter Took a Deep Look Into the Science of Smoking Pot. What He Found Is Scary.
Carriers Swore They'd Stop Selling Location Data. Will They Ever?
Cory Doctorow: Disruption for Thee, But Not for Me
Monday roundup
Youngest kids in class may be over-diagnosed with ADHD
Destroyed for Nothing
“The closing of GM’s Detroit plant—erected at the expense of a vibrant urban neighborhood—is a final twist of the knife in a tale of displacement and destruction.”Exclusive: Google Employees Debated Burying Conservative Media In Search
You can be an advocate or you can be a search engine. You can't honestly be both.Obama Tells Wall Street to Thank him for Making Them so Much Money
The work-from-home doctor will see you now
The Ignored Legacy of George H.W. Bush: War Crimes, Racism, and Obstruction of Justice
The Forgotten Legacy of George H.W. Bush That the Media Won’t Tell You About
Post Office Has Boom Year: Loses More Money Than Ever
San Francisco's Wealthy Leftists Are Making Homelessness Worse
G20 Summit, Top Agenda Item: Bye-Bye American Empire
Texas Bill Would Set Foundation for a “Gun Rights Sanctuary State”
Landlord Tells Harvard Student to Move Out Over Legally Owned Guns
Supreme Court Deals Unanimous, Welcome Blow to Administrative State in Frog Case
Curtains for the Clintons
The Cities That Amazon HQ2 Left Behind
“Amazon’s yearlong search for the location of its second headquarters was billed as a chance to transform an American city. In reality, it made plain an economic system that increases inequality, monopoly power, and political polarization.”Bonus Sunday mini-roundup
Poll – Dem Choice For 2020 POTUS Race: None Of The Above
Newly Unsealed Documents Show Top FDIC Officials Running Operation Choke Point
“Last week brought new revelations regarding Operation Choke Point, the Obama administration’s effort to freeze politically disfavored businesses out of the financial system.”U.S. Secret Service Warns ID Thieves are Abusing USPS’s Mail Scanning Service
The DEA and ICE are hiding surveillance cameras in streetlights
Florida Sec. of State Orders Recount for Both Senate and Governor’s Races
“The mandatory recount occurs if the winning candidate’s margin is less than 0.5 percent”Are We Becoming a Victimocracy?
Proof positive that these Dems were against Jeff Sessions before they were for him
Feinstein Urged Obama To Use Presidential Power To Limit Immigration: ‘No Legislation Necessary’
“Nobel Laureate in Physics; "Global Warming is Pseudoscience"”
Wednesday roundup
Friday roundup
Headlines that don't merit their own entry
Study: 80% of Americans Believe Political Correctness Is a Problem
Trump's Trade War Isn't Working Because Tariffs Hurt Americans
The $15 Minimum Wage Is Turning Hard Workers Into Black Market Lawbreakers: New at Reason
Rand Paul Reveals Media Hid Key Detail About GOP Baseball Attacker
Obama had secret plan to validate Clinton victory if Trump didn't accept it: report
NeoNote — The nature of politcs
❝❝Ever notice when someone picks a scapegoat, it's because they think the scapegoat can't fight back?NeoNotes are the selected comments that I made on other boards, in email, or in response to articles where I could not respond directly.
I agree with you that politics is a source of great evil in the World.
I disagree that the Trump and the Republicans are the cause. Or even most of the cause.
One annoying thing about politics is that people are willing to overlook the misconduct of "their" side even while slinging wild accusations against the Enemy. The accusations may or may not be accurate. But you can count on the Enemy not being quite the Ultimate Horror Unleashed on Mankind. And you can count that your side is not quite the paragon of virtue and self-sacrifice that they claim.
Politics is about controlling the other. Never you, always the other. When government is involved politics is about control backed by force.
Politicians are never on your side. Even as they stand wrapped in the flag clutching holy writ promising that they will be your bestest friend ever no matter what.
I'm sorry, but I can't agree. Obama used the IRS and Justice Department against his enemies, among other things. And the Democrats looked the other way.
Rather than get into a long and pointless discussion of who did what worse, I want to point out something that most people overlook.
The politicos NEED you to blame the other party and never question the wisdom of your party's decisions. It's always the other party that is doing things Too Terrible and always your own party that promises to Save The Day. When you buy into that, you perpetuate the system. You're always going to be victimized and you're never ever going to be saved. If you were saved, you'd have no reason to vote the party line.
I know I have my political critics on this site, but believe me when I tell you that there are conservatives who are just as threatened by the Democrat leadership as you are by Trump.
Too often today, people make excuses for what their side does by trotting out the disasters from the other side.
I want less government. I think government is a terrible danger to liberty. I think politicos and technocrats complicate things because they don't want you asking questions and they don't want you changing the status quo. They don't want you understanding what they do.
So when I see someone insisting that this flavor of politico is slightly less objectionable, I tell them they are wrong.
Accurate, as far as it goes.
*sighs* Look, I know that other pagans think I am simplistic and partisan when it comes to politics. And believe me, I realize how ironic it is for me to denounce mixing paganism with politics while having a political blog called Pagan Vigil.
Politics is one of my darker passions. I'm better at it than any amateur has any right to be. I understand the temptations and lusts because those are my temptations, my lusts, but for a bit of discipline and some promises I made. There's a line from Doctor Who, “Good men don’t need rules. Today is not the day to find out why I have so many.” These days I try to use my abilities and urges in a good cause. Mostly I succeed.
I've said that politics is about controlling the other. It's literally "power over." All the processes, all the carefully defined rules to protect democracy, all the blame exists SOLEY to keep people from looking too carefully at "the sausage being made." To keep people from asking how much freedom they are "supposed" to sacrifice for "the Greater Good." To keep them from asking themselves why expecting the other guy to sacrifice and compromise is GOOD but they themselves aren't supposed to sacrifice and compromise. To keep them from accepting that POWER OVER for their principles just might not be as as effective as power with based on things we all share.
Smashing the opposition just makes more pieces that can regrow.❞❞
NeoNote — So change the law
❝❝I realize that this is going against the narrative, but the immigration mess predated Trump. The difference is that Trump has decided to mostly enforce the law while Obama decided to sometimes not. The Obama administration is on record telling Congress that it was a lousy law.NeoNotes are the selected comments that I made on other boards, in email, or in response to articles where I could not respond directly.
Democrats are remarkable at ignoring bad law if a Democrat is President.
If you don't like the law, change it. Don't go selectively protesting because a government functionary does their job. That's virtue signaling.
Where were the protests before Tump was elected?
It's bad law. It was abused before Trump decided to run and the only reason it's getting all the attention now is because a Republican is in office. This is literally being sold as evil Trump while almost no progressives are talking about changing or revoking the law. It's propaganda telling people that if a nice Democrat is in office, they won't have to worry about that bad old law because the Democrat President will have the moral courage to ignore it.“Family separation was a frontline issue for immigration activists for the last decade or more. They warned of a generation of orphans scarred by the loss of their parents. They cautioned that Obama expanded deportation forces on his own to a degree that would be horribly exploited by a Republican president. (At the time, they were worried about Mitt Romney.)
The Obama administration conceded as much on the issue of separation in 2011, when Cecilia Muñoz, White House director of intergovernmental affairs, told PBS, “Even if the [immigration] law is executed with perfection, there will be parents separated from their children.”
Many liberals contend Obama never ripped babies from the arms of screaming parents. They should ask, for example, the over 150,000 immigrant children separated from their parents due to detention and deportation proceedings in 2012 if that’s true. Or the over 500,000 immigrant children, who experienced separation between 1998 and that year.”
➢ Separation Of Immigrant Families Was Part Of Deportation Under Obama—Now Trump Is Expanding The Practice
Again, it's bad law. Trump can only do what he has done because of laws on the books for years.
It's not just one law. We keep trying to fix the problem with more law which creates more problems which need more law.
Except it is the law.
Would you have government ignore the law if the politicos didn't think it was moral? Remember we have an AG who was spouting Bible quotes to justify his immorality.
If the law is wrong, it should be changed. Preferably removed. Anything else puts us at the whim of the politicos and bureaucrats. If we are to have freedom and protection by law, then the rule of law must be uniform. No enforcing it when this man is in office and ignoring it when that woman is in office.
I know you don't like what is happening and you blame Trump. But it it is the law. Selective enforcement just means the threat of tyranny is always there.
Change the law.❞❞
No one asked
NeoNote — What has Trump done that is so bad?
❝❝I'm not a Trump fan. I don't trust him and I don't like him.NeoNotes are the selected comments that I made on other boards, in email, or in response to articles where I could not respond directly.
That being said, when some of us said we didn't like Obama, we were told to sit down and shut up. Obama won, and it was his ball game.
That alone should raise people's hackles.
Right after Trump was elected, there was the woman's march thing. I asked a very progressive group just what was it that Trump had said or done that presented such a threat to women in particular. The only real answer I got was something about woman's reproductive rights. That's when I pointed out that Trump supported Planned Parenthood.
One year later, the same group was talking about supporting the next woman's march. I asked what Trump had done in the previous year that was a particular threat to women. I got something vague about the judges he appointed. I asked how that was different than a liberal President appointing liberal judges.
The complaints about Trump not being legitimately elected are mostly recycled from Bush the Younger. The complaints about Trump being a danger to world peace and being totally incompetent are being recycled from Goldwater and Reagan. I know, I went back and checked. Progressive will complain about Trump tweeting from the toilet, but they can't tell you what he has done that they find repulsive. Except judicial appointments, of course.
We've reached the point where we're told that Trump is E-V-I-L, but they can't say why. And meanwhile with overwhelming bad news coverage, he still has an approval rating of more than 50%.
I don't like him. I don't trust him. I think he is going to make some very bad decisions that will be very bad for the country. But meanwhile, he's screwing up the established government traditions and driving the technocrats crazy. He's disrupting things that need to be disrupted. He's changing government. I have to give the man credit for that.❞❞
NeoNote — Not defense
❝❝I just want to point out that American "defense" policy involves military action against nations when Congress hasn't declared war.NeoNotes are the selected comments that I made on other boards, in email, or in response to articles where I could not respond directly.
Even Trump complained when Obama launched military actions without Congressional approval.
You tell me. Should we change the Constitution so the President can attack any other nation on his authority alone? Or should we insist Congress does it's job?
Is this about America, right or wrong?
Or is it about liberty?
How about multiple missile attacks?
And is it right to launch missiles into other nations? You've said that eight months is sufficient. Is four months? Is four weeks? Is four days?
Is it right for other nations to launch missiles into our country?
After all, we have a proven record of meddling in the governments of other nations.
So you are saying that the U.S. has the unique power to fire missiles into other countries.
So much for freedom.
Obviously there is.
And it's even covered by that top ten list of yours.
At the very least, I think using a missile against innocents qualifies as murder.rob
Too late.
I do have a solution for the opium fields. But it doesn't involve armies. It would be a lot more effective though.
Oh?
There are an awful lot of people who got shot at who would disagree with you.
ETA: Not to mention all those overseas military bases.
You're arguing over definitions and a matter of degree.
Might doesn't make right. I've told you that before.
Just because you can do something doesn't mean you should do something. Or that you are justified in doing it.
Justified?
And if we're wrong, does that make us weak? Or just a bully that no one wants to face?
There is a century old story that I tell sometimes. Back during the Russian revolution, President Wilson sent American troops to intervene. The "mission" was murky at best, which led to failed promises and out-and-out lies. Wilson did this without Congressional authorization, we weren't at war with Russia.
Fast forward a couple of decades. Some of the Soviet General Staff had faced American soldiers in the trenches. They knew exactly what American words were worth.
And after WWII, that shaped the Cold War.
All because an American President took it on himself to intervene in a revolution without Congressional authority.
Don't get mad at me. It's right there in the Constitution. And if Congress hasn't declared war, then why are American troops fighting?
Considering who has been President, do you really want no checks and balances when it comes to war?
So why do we have troops fighting when war has not been declared?
Politicos have sacrificed the nation's honor and the lives of American troops for what?
Why do we have troops fighting when war has not been declared?❞❞
NeoNote — Obamacare
❝❝Okay, let's talk about the ACA, a law so "good" that nobody was allowed to read it before Congress passed it. A law so well written that it had to be illegally modified by executive order again and again just to work. A law that was supposed to pay for itself, but was so dependent on government subsidies that states had to withdraw just so their citizens could have health insurance. A law deliberately designed to reduce the number of health insurance companies and choices available to consumers. That last bit and raising prices is the only thing that the ACA has accomplished.NeoNotes are the selected comments that I made on other boards, in email, or in response to articles where I could not respond directly.
The only reason government is involved in healthcare to begin with is because government enforced salary caps and companies had to offer something more to recruit and keep employees. Every part of healthcare that government has been involved with, costs have outpaced inflation, availability never meets demand, and innovation has been stifled.
If this is Obama's legacy, it has resulted in less medical care at a higher price and almost impossible to use. But it looks good.❞❞
NeoNote — Government is not your friend
❝❝I never expected Trump to do anything except disrupt.NeoNotes are the selected comments that I made on other boards, in email, or in response to articles where I could not respond directly.
Pardon, but you're making the same mistake they did. You think that if the right person was in charge, everything would be okay.
Government is not your friend.
We will have a government regardless - until we replace it. The replacement may or may not work as well, it may or may not get better, but the ability to replace is inherent in the promise of America.
We've not had a "better" government in decades. Good government is not measured by how much government controls, but by how much it doesn't. It's no accident that America's greatest advances come from places that government doesn't regulate.
Sometimes (and more times than we'd like to admit), the best way to fix something is to replace it. Sometimes the only way to replace something is to destroy it. It works that way with food, clothing, houses. It works that way with cars, companies, and marriages. And yes, sometimes it works that way with government.
There is some opinion that NASA exists to keep other (and particularly American private interests) out of space. There a fair-to-middling novel Kings of the High Frontier, that explores that. I'm rereading it right now.
We understood the principles behind the internet years before. AT&T had adopted some of them years before to keep long-distance phone calls from being interrupted. Even after the internet became public, the real driver for bandwidth and video compression was porn. Netflix owes it's existence to horny men looking for naked pictures.
Building roads has always been easy. Maintaining roads is the hard part. There government has failed so much that "infrastructure" is a code word for raising taxes.
My faith is in the free market, not consumer capitalism.
Trump is changing things (and disrupting things), but he's only a small part of what is happening.
First of all, they were poor before Trump was even a candidate. And they weren't helped by Obama's war on the coal industry. If you read the article, state and local authorities had a hand in there too.
I haven't looked at this in depth, but I know there wasn't much of an economic base to begin with. Despite what is claimed, that's not something that any government can create. At a minimum, it requires good ideas and private investment.
Oh, and the jobs vanishing overseas? That's something the Democrats and Republicans share the blame for.
Like Venezuela?
I could give you pages of proof, but long story short, central control distorts the economy. The more pressure focused in one area, the bigger the disruption. On a small enough scale, you may escape second and third order functions. But if you are using a healthy economy to support massive intervention, you are pretty much guaranteeing those second and third order disruptions.
Think of it like tapping a water main without turning down the pressure. It will give way, it will require replacement, and while it is being fixed most of the system will have to be shut down. The only question is when.
I'm not a conservative.
I picked Venezuela because in just a few short years socialism destroyed a robust, expanding, petroleum based economy.
Your other examples aren't exactly socialist either. They are more progressive than the US, but they have not nationalized their means of production. Unlike say, Venezuela.
Have you taken a closer look at the Obama Administration? Cronyism, emotional appeal, basically everything that Trump does except it was (mostly) within the system.
Government is not your friend.
I repeat, have you taken a look at the Obama administration? A good, long, hard, unbiased look? Have you seen how many of his contributors benefited?
Nor is the Obama administration alone.
This is what annoys me. You're all set to blame Trump and the GOP for crimes against humanity all while excusing the crimes and excesses of the Democrats. And you are still calling for more government control.
Now if you really want, we can match abuse of power against abuse of power. I can tell you horror stories about Congresscritters and technocrats. I can show how almost everything you've been told about economics is designed to confuse you and keep you quiet. I can prove that almost everything government tells you is a lie just to convince you that government is necessary and that one flavor of politics is better than the other.
How about I tell you truths instead?
Government is not your friend.
Politics is about control, not truth, not compassion, not liberty, and not funding.
There's no Man on a White Horse riding to the rescue. You shouldn't trust anyone who looks like that because they are cosplaying.
The Republicans and the Democrats are about equally as guilty for the mess we're in. Each will blame the other, then you for not caring enough. Each will want more money and more power.
There's no objective difference between the party on the right and the party on the left. The only difference is who gets screwed now and who gets screwed tomorrow.
Blame Trump. Blame Obama. Blame Smith. It doesn't matter because government is the problem.
Government is not your friend.
Obama didn't reduce the debt. He reduced the deficit. That means the government didn't overspend as much as it had in previous years. Oh, and by the way, they printed more currency to "cover" some of the difference which raised the inflation rate and the interest on the national debt.
Trump didn't nuke North Korea. He responded to provocation, as Presidents at least as far back as Kennedy have done. And by the way, the Norks are willing to negotiate now.
I don't remember seeing anything about Trump going after gay marriage.
Before you defend the ACA, take a look at the costs of healthcare starting when Medicare became law. It's no accident that the costs have exceeded inflation every year since. Thanks to the ACA, dozens of states are scrambling to try to cover healthcare costs. Some are opting out of the program. Legally they aren't supposed to, but there is no way they can cover costs.
I'm not familiar with Golden Valley.
Only Congress can decriminalize marijuana. Since they are exploiting an opioid crisis created by government action, I don't expect them to act soon. Basically when Obama's DoJ stopped enforcing marijuana law, they were breaking the law.
The cities and counties who have the strictest gun laws are the same cities and counties who have the highest rate of gun crimes. Pay specific attention to Chicago and Baltimore. Most of those areas have had Democrat administrations for decades.
"Vote Democrat." Why? So we can fall off the left side instead of the right side?
Government should be smaller than absolutely necessary.
You mean the multinational corporations who pay both sides but mainly the left ones to pass laws and regulations that benefit them and shut out competition?
You mean the alt-right is a bigger threat than unaccountable race hustlers and movements like BLM who focus on events that fit the narrative and exclude things like "black" on "black" crime in the major cites?
You mean like the attacks on Christianity that happen just because someone professes their faith?
And let's not forget all those people who are only too willing to tell "white" people what they can and cannot say, what they can and cannot think, what they can and cannot do, because of "white privilege."
Government is playing all sides (not both sides, all sides) against each other, and the politicos just keep getting taxes and more power.
Like I told you before, if you want to keep the people you distrust from having power over you backed by government force, the only sure way is to drastically reduce government power. That way you can't mess with them and they can't mess with you.
But it is possible.
Thomas Paine wrote in Common Sense: “Society is produced by our wants and, government by our wickedness; the former promotes our happiness positively by uniting our affections, the latter negatively by restraining our vices.”
Milton Friedman wrote: “Government has three primary functions. It should provide for military defense of the nation. It should enforce contracts between individuals. It should protect citizens from crimes against themselves or their property. When government-- in pursuit of good intentions tries to rearrange the economy, legislate morality, or help special interests, the cost come in inefficiency, lack of motivation, and loss of freedom. Government should be a referee, not an active player.”
James Madison said: "There are more instances of the abridgment of the freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments of those in power than by violent and sudden usurpations."
People are perfectly capable of making their own decisions. Those choices won’t always be ones you agree with. Sometimes those choices will be bad ones with terrible consequences. Still, freedom is based on choice. Without choice, there is no freedom. Without freedom, we aren’t human.
You are perfectly capable of making your own decisions. That is your right, that is what makes you human, and f*ck all to anyone who tells you different.
KYFHO now and forever. The only protection you should get is the certainty that NO ONE ELSE can use government to control you.
But, if you expect that right for yourself, you’d better damn well defend if for others. Even if you don’t like them. Even if you don’t trust them. Especially if you don’t trust them. Otherwise you will lose your choice.
Otherwise you will lose your freedom.
It’s simple. If you want to live free, you can’t meddle in other’s lives.
The second you start meddling is the second you sacrifice your own rights.
“The greater good” is just as big a tyranny as “for you own good.”
You only think it’s fantasy because that is what you’ve been taught by those benefitting from the current power structure.❞❞
Monday supersized roundup
CDC Admits Rx Opioid Deaths ‘Significantly Inflated’
Imagine that, government lying to create a crisisHouse passes controversial legislation giving the US more access to overseas data
Secretly going after your privacyEx-Nobel Secretary Admits Obama’s Prize Was A Mistake
It was all for showThink you know Mary Magdalene? Think again
This could be an amazing film. I hope it finds and American distributerWhat Are Zombie Retail Stores Really Worth: Answers Emerge
When the commercial real estate bubble bursts, it's going to hurtPhiladelphia DA Larry Krasner Promised a Criminal Justice Revolution. He’s Exceeding Expectations.
Great news and demonstrating how to do it rightRivals and consumers will rein in Facebook, not regulation
Don't fall for government's promise. Contrast with It’s Time to Break Up FacebookFriended: How the Obama Campaign Connected with Young Voters
It was acceptable for Obama, not for TrumpYouTube Suspends Major Gun Manufacturer, Bans Instructional Gun Videos
It is a private platform after all. But what do you think will be off limits tommorrow?Scott Walker Is Making It Harder to Receive Welfare in Wisconsin. Will This Become a Nationwide Blueprint?
I do not believe government should do welfare.Jann Wenner says MeToo suffers from absence of due process
He's rightHOGG WILD! David Hogg Rallies Democrats in DC: “If You Listen Real Close You Can Hear the People in Power Shaking” (VIDEO)
This is manufactured.Reforming Dodd-Frank, for Real
“Rather than adopting a recent Senate bill, Congress should reconsider last year’s House measure, which is much more supportive of free-market discipline.”Lawsuits Pile Up As #DeleteFacebook Movement Spreads
Facebook is a data-mining companyRural hospital shutdowns force communities to take care of their own
A real healthcare crisisThe Cambridge Analytica Scandal: An Elitist Delusion
They want to control you, and not just the RepublicansHillary fundraiser causes a stink with the DNC
Hillary Clinton wants the 2020 nominationWill the Democrats Blow It in 2020?
“The question is whether the Democrats will lead their party on a giddy march to the left.”Earth Hour or Human Achievement Hour: Which is the enlightened choice?
I have it on good authority that most of the people reading this are human.Thursday supersized roundup
Survey Says: Politicized Sports, Entertainment Driving Viewers Away
But some progressives have been saying it doesn't make a make a significant differenceDigitalships and Double-Standards
Document drop: Another fatal FBI fumble in Florida
What happens when diversity is more important than public safetyThe Schooling of David Hogg
Public spectacle doesn't mean you'll get respect. See also Dear David Hogg, You’re a Lying, Opportunistic, Insufferable Little Toe Rag
California judge holds climate change ‘tutorial’ ahead of landmark case against oil companies
This alone should be enough to show the judge's biasNOAA Data Tampering Approaching 2.5 Degrees
Completely rewriting climate historyEU reveals a digital tax plan that could penalize Google, Amazon and Facebook
The important thing is NOT that the EU is going after these companies. The important thing is that "traditional businesses" pay 23.2% in taxes.Why Trump Is Right to Reject the Paris Climate Agreement
It was never about reducing CO2. It was about the United States paying through the nose.The Problem With Social Justice Today -- Dividing Rather than Unifying
Labels, pronouns, and power over speech.Trump is right: The special counsel should never have been appointed
I still think the Obama and Clinton Russian connections should be investigated.Congress Is Still Ignoring Its Spending Problem as Deadline Looms for $1.3 Trillion Spending Bill
“Four out of five voters agree that Washington has a spending problem, but a new omnibus spending bill will add yet more to the national debt.”Freedom-Loving Parents, Rejoice: Utah Approves Free-Range Kids Bill
Let kids be kidsThe sad hysteria of the Southern Poverty Law Center
Targeting conservative people and groupsElizabeth Warren’s Unaccountable Federal Agency Backfires on Her: New at Reason
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is unconstitutional. All government agencies should answer to Congress.More California Cities Seek to Defy ‘Sanctuary State’ as Revolt Spreads
This could make the succession movement very interestingFrance: Toward Total Submission to Islam, Destruction of Free Speech
All other things being equal, the side that can't stand dissent is usually wrong.Syrup Smugglers Take on the Maple Mafia
The free market is economic activity between consenting adults. Funny how governments don't like that, "for your own good" of course.CalPERS retirees are suddenly worried about their pensions. What happened?
Government took too much power and mismanaged the assetsFired FBI official authorized criminal probe of Sessions, sources say
I'm not even sure this is legal against a sitting Attorney GeneralFOSTA Passes Senate, Making Prostitution Ads a Federal Crime Against Objections from DOJ and Trafficking Victims
Another headline grab for politicosFriday supersized roundup
Florida vote to post 'In God we Trust' in schools prompts a question: Whose God?
Why does government think it can choose someone's religion?Behind name redacted Rampage: Obama's School-Leniency Policy
DisturbingDick’s Sporting Goods Bans Some Rifle Sales…Again
Virtue signaling…againGoogle is censoring shopping results for AR-15, handguns and more
Chilling. Do you really want Google deciding what you can see on the 'net?A rural county legalized marijuana farms. It took their tax money – then voted to ban them
Literally taxes are theftThe IRS Is Coming for Your Passports
This is probably seven types of illegal.Police Unions Defend Bad Cops Who Do Awful Things. Why Won't They Defend Broward County Deputy?
Follow the money‘Chappaquiddick’ to Open Film Festival… on Martha’s Vineyard
Beyond surrealStop treating the Southern Poverty Law Center like it's a respectable and responsible organization
The SPLC is heavily biased against conservatives, and moderately biased against libertariansChina banned the letter N from the internet after people used it to attack Xi Jinping's plan to rule forever
Why we need a free and open internetStill More Bad News (For Democrats) About The GOP Tax Cuts
Blacks, Hispanics, and women hit hardestKoch Brothers Group Launches Ads Against Tax Breaks for Amazon HQ2
Why should any company be shielded from the taxes that other companies pay?The Parkland Teens Fighting For Gun Control Have The Backing Of These Huge Organizing Groups
Yes, it's BuzzFeed which I don't like using as a source. It's also accurate.Some Billings students are opposed to planned walk-out
Funny how only one side of the debate is hitting the national mediaFacebook Keeps Secret Files on EVERYONE Including Non-Users – Here’s How to See Yours
Exaggerating, but not by muchWhat Mueller Has and What He’s Missing
There is very little doubt that this was an attempt to derail an elected PresidentDerry business turning away Republican customers
If the tables were turned, don't you think a business would be shamed into servicing Democrat voters?Italian Voters Set to Shake European Union to Its Core as Anti Mass Migration and Euroscepticism Dominate Election
What? You mean Brexit was not an isolated event?Trump the 'Big Second Amendment Person' Becomes 'Trump the Gun Grabber'
“Trump's embrace of gun control is consistent with his views before he ran for president.”Pittsburgh Still Won't Let Anyone See Its Amazon Bid
There's no reason voters shouldn't know the detailsShocker! Rent Control Makes Housing Scarcer and More Expensive
“San Francisco rent control reduced affected rental housing by 15 percent while boosting citywide rents by 5 percent”How can a place with 58,000 homeless people continue to function?
Excellent questionWhat Has Capitalism Ever Done For Us?
Capitalism holds the roots of freedom'Get on the Right Side of History': A Phrase G.K. Chesterton Would Have Understood
“Telling others to 'get on the right side of history' is not just a form of intellectual bullying.”Supersized Monday roundup
Thursday roundup
Florida Shooting Survivor Says Media Is Exploiting Shooting to Push an Agenda
Brandon Minoff is a voice of reason. No, not the only one. And no, his opinion isn't necessarily the last word. But ask yourself, why aren't we hearing more from students like him? See also Parkland School is turning into America’s Grenfell TowerWitnessing the Collapse of the Global Elite
It was always about promises they couldn't keep.Unrestrained Judgment
Obama put a policy in effect by decree, and the judge claims that Trump can't repeal it by decreeSchool shooting survivor knocks down 'crisis actor' claim
David Hogg says he is not a crisis actor. See also Houston-area school district threatens to suspend students who protest after Florida shootingThe End of (Artificial) Stability
“The central banks'/states' power to maintain a permanent bull market in stocks and bonds is eroding.”Officials Identify More Rotherham Victims, Number Up to 1,510
This is why nations must insist that the rule of law applies to everyone. No exceptions.JOURNALISM! CNN harasses Trump supporter at her home over what she shared on Facebook
Thou shalt not dissentDonald Trump's Listening Session With Mass Shooting Survivors Was Really Powerful
If this is acknowledged at all, within 24 hours someone will find a reason to dismiss it.Broward Deputies to Carry Rifles on School Grounds: Sheriff
After the fact and it's only temporaryCleaning Up Air Pollution May Strengthen Global Warming
Unintended consequences. Maybe.Parkland shooter always in trouble, never expelled. Could school system have done more?
Not just the school system. 39 visits by police.South Africa's Brand New President Wants To Confiscate Land From White Farmers
That didn't work so well in Zimbabwe. Bottom line, when government confiscates and redistributes, expect disasterDr. Gina Loudon: Do You Trust Federal Bureaucrats to Decide if You’re Sane Enough to Keep Your Second Amendment Rights?
The state is not a moral entityWednesday roundup
When Border Searches Become Unreasonable
Warrantless searches are not a good ideaLegacies aren’t what they used to be as Obama faces environmental lawsuit
More and more questions about the Obama "library"Blowback: How Torture Fuels Terrorism Rather Than Reduces It
Somehow we're fueling revengeMore Proof Lib Media Bias Is Just A Myth…
This isn't a regular story, but it was just too goodPelosi’s Message To Democrats: Fight Anything Trump, Republicans Put Forward
Nothing about the meritsUS Army Going Old School With Training After Too Many Recruits Act “Entitled”
Time for some changesReport from Louisiana: Are Indie Booksellers Coming Back?
I'd love to see them bounce backScandal, Corruption, Lawbreaking — And So What?n
Interesting take on the attacks on TrumpBOMBSHELL: Comey Held Secret Obama White House Meeting Before The Inauguration
And he forgot to mention it to CongressCourt orders restoration of DACA program
The original program was done without Congress and is illegalIt's The (Democracy-Poisoning) Golden Age Of Free Speech
Wired makes the case against free speechBill Gates: tech companies inviting government intervention
Yeah, they kinda areDon’t Abandon the King Standard
We need to find common groundTuesday roundup
Inside The Two Years That Shook Facebook—And The World
Very long but a good summaryFederal abuses on Obama's watch represent a growing blight on his legacy
Some of us knew this during his first term'We are being targeted': Voodoo believers fear a backlash
There's a mess, but this article doesn't help sort it ourIs California Starting To Circle The Drain?
A long and almost unbelievable tale of what happens when the police aren't policing anymoreWe All Live on Campus Now
Groupthink spillover'Hire the best and fire the worst': Trump proposes biggest civil service change in 40 years
If this is a plan and not a negotiating ploy, it's a really good ideaAre Progressives More Biased Than Conservatives?
“Progressives generally assume that they're less biased than conservatives. New research shows otherwise.”Woman Dragged Out of West Virginia House Hearing For Listing Oil and Gas Contributions to Members
It's an issue that should be examined before they pass any lawCatholic School Parents Fight Lesbian Teacher's Firing. Here's Why That's Good.
Shifting moralityIf You Really Wanted to Ban Porn, Here's What It Would Take
Detailed look at exactly what it would takeNew York Times CEO: Print journalism has maybe another 10 years
Digital works better for millions of peopleCalifornia’s drought restrictions on wasteful water habits could be coming back — this time they’ll be permanent
Water is precious in the desert, and California has acted otherwise for decadesCommonwealth in secret succession plans
I didn't know that head of the Commonwealth wasn't hereditary.NeoNotes — Trump's facts & examining the 2016 election
I remind you that no American political fact for the last two years has been easily ascertained. Or static.
Read More...Legal and orderly
““In approaching immigration reform, I believe we must enact tough, practical reforms that ensure and promote the legal and orderly entry of immigrants into our country.””
— Senator Barack Obama, Senate floor, 2007
Source : Take The 'Racist Xenophobe' Quiz: Who Said This About Illegal Immigration?
Better secure
““We all agree on the need to better secure the border, and to punish employers who choose to hire illegal immigrants.””
— Senator Barack Obama, 2005
Source : Take The 'Racist Xenophobe' Quiz: Who Said This About Illegal Immigration?
Employers must use
““I continue to believe that we need stronger enforcement on the border and at the workplace. And that means a workable mandatory system that employers must use to verify the legality of their workers.””
— Senator Barack Obama, Senate floor, 2007
Source : Take The 'Racist Xenophobe' Quiz: Who Said This About Illegal Immigration?
Need to start
““We need to start by giving agencies charged with border security new technology, new facilities and more people to stop, process and deport illegal immigrants.””
— Senator Barack Obama, 2005
Source : Take The 'Racist Xenophobe' Quiz: Who Said This About Illegal Immigration?
Millions of illegal immigrants
““Right now we've got millions of illegal immigrants who live and work here without knowing their identity or background.””
— Senator Barack Obama, 2005
Source : Take The 'Racist Xenophobe' Quiz: Who Said This About Illegal Immigration?
Strong border security
““Let me repeat: We need strong border security at the borders.””
— Senator Barack Obama, 2005
Source : Take The 'Racist Xenophobe' Quiz: Who Said This About Illegal Immigration?
Easy
““If only everyone (in the Middle East) could be like Scandinavians, (achieving peace) would all be easy.””
— President Barack Obama, 2016
Source : Take The 'Racist Xenophobe' Quiz: Who Said This About Illegal Immigration?
Disrespect the rule of law
““Those who enter the country illegally and those who employ them disrespect the rule of law, and they are showing disregard for those who are following the law. We simply cannot allow people to pour into the United States undetected, undocumented (and) unchecked, and circumventing the line of people who are waiting patiently, diligently and lawfully to become immigrants in this country.””
— Senator Barack Obama, 2005
Source : Take The 'Racist Xenophobe' Quiz: Who Said This About Illegal Immigration?
Friday roundup
Uranium One informant makes Clinton allegations to Congress
Clintons, the scandals that keep on givingCanadian PM: Sharia law is compatible with democracy
In which the Canadian PM proves his idiocy beyond any doubtLet Us Eradicate Poverty, Not Demolish Wealth
Smart headline, but the rest of the article worth readingBefore You "Buy the Dip," Look at This One Chart
I think this is sound adviceJudicial Watch Tom Fitton Reports 3rd Dossier Provided by Obama to Sen. Cardin
If there was a third dossier, was there a fourth and fifth? What did President Obama know and when did he know it?Online Gambling -- None Of Washington's Business (But Its Enemies Don't Care)
Beware of politicos who promise things for "your own good"Institute for Justice Sues New Jersey Over Ban on Home Bakers Selling Their Cakes
Notice how Big Government loves to go after the little guyOne year later: President’s regulations crackdown is working
Less government means more prosperityConsumers Are Open to Superhuman Vision and Cognitive Enhancements. Are Regulators?
Regulators shouldn't have any sayCongress must stop union scheme siphoning funds from Medicaid
Yep.Why are we still regulating Main Street like Wall Street?
Good questionSenate Report: Obamacare and Medicaid Expansion Contributed to the Opioid Epidemic
You mean reducing the cost of medicine by fiat made addiction problems worse? Gee, who could have foreseen that?$20 Billion Hidden in the Swamp: Feds Redact 255,000 Salaries
Somebody is hiding stuff from the votersWednesday roundup
FBI, DOJ Argue for Dismissal of Suit About Garland, Texas Attack
The FBI not only knew about a 2015 terrorist attack, they provoked it. So why aren't the people responsible under arrest?Thanks Capitalism, Refrigerators Are Awesome!
Living better than the kings of a century agoGOP Leaders Tell Fiscal Hawks To Fly Away, No Budget This Year
Reduce spending. Reduce taxes. Decrease regulation. Decrease laws. That's the only way to restore lasting freedom.NYC Police Union Argues Releasing Body Cam Footage Violates Cops' Civil Rights
Police privilege.Thoughts on Challenging the Climate Orthodoxy
Nobody should be beyond questionSenate Votes to Shut Down Rand Paul Filibuster Against Surveillance Act Renewal
When government doesn't trust you, why should you trust government?Trump to PC: “No More!”
Donald Trump's greatest virtue is that he disrupts.Jeff Flake: You know that ‘Trump is Stalin’ thing I mentioned? Nevermind.
Right out of an old SNL sketchPresident Nobama
No one should be surprised that Trump is unraveling Barack Obama's "legacy"Carillion’s Demise
“To me, this looks like a catch-all company that has bedded itself in with the government and helpfully told politicians and civil servants that they can take care of everything. No problem, just leave it to us, just keep that cash hose turned on full.”European Angst Over Immigration
Europe may have committed cultural suicide by opening to "immigrants" who don't want to assimilate to the existing culturesClinton Corruption Update: It’s All One Scandal
You should ask yourself why Hillary Clinton is not in prison?Democrats: Trump must capitulate on DACA “to prove you’re not prejudiced or bigoted”
This will make the Democrats look very foolish. Go after Trump with anything less than the truth and it will backfire.Dick Durbin lied before
The White House Is Refuting A Shocker Of A Claim From A Top Democratic Senator
Oct. 23, 2013, 2:55 PM
““A claim from the No. 2 Democrat in the Senate, Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), drew denials from House Republican leadership and the White House on Wednesday.
Durbin claimed in a weekend Facebook post that a House GOP leader told President Barack Obama that the leader "cannot even stand to look at" him during a recent negotiation over the government shutdown and raising the nation's debt ceiling.
White House Press Secretary Jay Carney said, flatly, that the exchange "did not happen."
A spokesman for House Speaker John Boehner was baffled by Durbin's allegation.
"The Speaker certainly didn’t say that, and doesn’t recall anyone else doing so," Michael Steel, Boehner's spokesman, said in an email Wednesday morning.””
— Brett LoGiurato
Tuesday roundup
The Big Con: The Truth Behind Net Neutrality and Why the Sky Is Not Falling
“Net neutrality was the government’s response to an actual problem. As usual, their response ignored the problem completely.”The Modern Art Of Pervs
Changing mores and the sexualization of childrenThe secret backstory of how Obama let Hezbollah off the hook
“How Hezbollah turned to trafficking cocaine and laundering money through used cars to finance its expansion.” So Obama let them break the law. I don't agree with the War on Drugs, but the President should uphold the law.CDC director says there are ‘no banned words’ at the agency
Well, I fell for this one too. I should know by now that the really bad stuff about Trump seldom turns out true. Also No, the CDC did not ban a list of wordsSince Feeding the Homeless is Now Illegal, A Group Carried AR15s to Give Out Food—It Worked
Unsanctioned, unofficial charity.The Other Tech Bubble
The ugliness behind the startup culture.In Legalizing Marijuana, Uruguay Trips over the Dollar, US Laws, and Global Banks
or “Why Drug Lords Love the Patriot Act.”3 Reasons Millennials Should Consider Ditching Karl Marx for Ayn Rand
“Karl Marx doesn’t align with what’s important to Millennials.”Jedi Mind Trick: The Disturbing, Destabilizing Abnormal Is Now Normal
Change means disrupting the system. And there's plenty of disruption.Is Your Cell Phone Protected by the Constitution?
The Supreme Court will decide, and it doesn't look good.‘We Made This (Harassment) Law Up From The Beginning And Now We’ve Won’
Deliberately screwing up society.Comey Should Be Indicted
It was obvious months ago, but now it's a given. It won't happen though. Indicting Comey is one step closer to HRC. And indicting HRC is one step closer to Barack Obama.Right Wing Extremism vs. Islamic Extremism in the United States: A Look at the Numbers
Debunking the claim that most terrorism in the US is carried out by the right wing.Rogert Ebert wants critics of Obama to "Put up or shut up"
This is a page from the original version of Pagan Vigil. There are some formatting differences. Originally published at www.paganvigil.com/C127135145/E20100903114934
Rogert Ebert wants critics of Obama to "Put up or shut up"
Funny how that only works if there is a liberal President
Here's the thing. Just because someone happens to be President doesn't mean that he shouldn't be criticized. He should be. Loudly. Publicly.
But for pity's sake pick the battles.
The fact is that there are those who lambast both Glenn Beck and Barak Obama (all hail the Imperious Leader, may his toenails never shrink!).
If it were a Republican President, Ebert would be at the head of the pack criticizing him. Oh wait, that already happened. Numerous times.
Sometimes I really hate being proven right again and again.
Now that it's "their guy," liberals like Ebert don't want anyone criticizing the President. And they will go out of their way to paint the most public opposition as "nuts."
Just like happened with conservatives and Bush.
Me, I say that the problems start because government tries to control too much of your life.
Yes, elected officials should be criticized. Loudly. Especially if they break their own rules and promises.
And if that doesn't work, just remember that the rule of law works both ways. If the "elite" won't abide by it, there is no reason you have to submit.
Posted: Fri - September 3, 2010 at 11:49 AM
Mexicans here before America was even an idea?
In which George W. Bush proves he is a gentleman, even if he did do most other things wrong
Tuesday roundup
Microsoft's new Chinese web portal censor's words like "freedom" and "democracy"
Read More...More from the stack
New Segregation Signs Pop Up in Leftist Establishments
Perpetuating racism in the name of freedomBorder Agents Seized American Citizen's Truck, Never Charged Him With A Crime
"You have no rights here"The Senate Is Close To Undermining The Internet By Pretending To 'Protect' The Children
Justifying tyrannyWe Didn't Normalize Trump. We Normalized the Left's Violence.
All other things being equal, the side that can't stand dissent is wrong.Exclusive: US government wiretapped former Trump campaign chairman
So why isn't Obama called to account for this?I moved from a blue state to a red state and it changed my life
"As I got to know my new Midwest home, I realize how living in a bubble and subscribing to the Middle America stereotypes is truly damaging to this country."To Combat "Hate," Make Government Weaker
Worth thinking aboutJames Comey Tried to Discredit Trump’s Wiretapping Assertions That Proved True
Why isn't this man in jail?Entire Volume of CIA Files On Lee Harvey Oswald, Set to Be Released in October, Has “Gone Missing”
Somebody is still hiding truth.The Silencing of Dissent
A paranoid take that may be trueTrump: “Venezuela Has FAITHFULLY Implemented Socialism…” The UN Goes SILENT!
Trump is right on thisHours After Hurricane Irma, Miami-Dade County Tickets Residents for Code Violations
You'd think there would be other priorities. You'd be wrong.File a FOIA, Get Sued
Why do you want to know, Citizen?Response to my Ebert entry
Beacon Headlines Quick Links for 31Aug2009
This is a page from the original version of Pagan Vigil. There are some formatting differences. Originally published at www.paganvigil.com/C1319896483/E20090831114244
Beacon Quick Links for 31Aug2009
Roundup of my link stack
Max Yasgur understood real American Values
Taking a stand even when you don't agreeThe Artist Formerly Known as Dissident: Artists have a duty to dissent—even against Obama
How we tolerate dissent says a great deal about our characterReal unemployment rate at 16 pct: Fed official
You should ask who is juggling the figures and whyBill would give president emergency control of Internet
Hey, let's take something that works because it's decentralized and no one person or group controls it and centralize controlLatest in Stimulus: 'Cash for Refrigerators
Because 'Cash for Clunkers' was such an unquestioned successChicago August Ends with Near-Record Cold
Because that global warming thing is getting blamed for everything elseThat's it for today. I'm going to go find someplace that doesn't have a crew digging up the road or laying new asphalt outside.
Posted: Mon - August 31, 2009 at 11:42 AM
Beacon Headline Quick Links for 23Mar2009
This is a page from the original version of Pagan Vigil. There are some formatting differences. Originally published at www.paganvigil.com/C1319896483/E20090323134948
Beacon Quick Links for 23Mar2009
Roundup of the headline links
Kroft to Obama: Are you punch-drunk?
I've begun to wonder that myself.Wikileaks taken offline after publishing Australia's banned websites
Turns out that the server couldn't handle the traffic.Resistance grows to Obama's bigger government
Encouraging signsDHS Officials Skirt Open Meeting Laws to Promote REAL ID
Evidently the law only applies to the little people.Montana's Sound Money Bill
I am not convinced that this one isn't a big dose of wish fulfillment, but it could be. Also here, but consider the source.US Mint Suspends Production of More Gold and Silver Coins
Granted it's collectable coins, but certainly worth watching close. Especially if states start requiring gold and silver for payment.US bikini wax ban plans ditched
New Jersey officials found they had a fight on their hands.Law puts non-offenders on state's sex registry
Another example of the tyranny of the sex offender laws.Posted: Mon - March 23, 2009 at 01:49 PM
Beacon Headline quick links for 03Mar2009
This is a page from the original version of Pagan Vigil. There are some formatting differences. Originally published at www.paganvigil.com/C1319896483/E20090303070215
Beacon quick links for 03Mar2009
Check out these stories all over the web
BofA chief admits Merrill aid 'mistake'
This is what, the third or fourth bank who said that their bank was forced to take the bailout money?Our Troubled Economy is a Response to Barack Obama's Policies
Just not the response he wanted. Watch the blame game continueSwitzerland Should Stiff-Arm The IRS
The interesting question is why something that was perfectly acceptable last year requires drastic action this year. Hat tip Samizdata.netPosted: Tue - March 3, 2009 at 07:02 AM
☆ Soundbite politics
Barack Obama is a big reason why Donald Trump was elected President.
But I'll get back to that.
Read More...Monday roundup
Molina Healthcare Exits Obamacare Exchanges in Two States, Experiences $230 Million Loss
Remember, the exchanges were never meant to last. And this is another mess that Obama chose to have his successor fix.Coast Guard Chief Will Disregard Trump’s Ban on Transgenders in Military
He can't, not legally. If the code changes and Trump gives the order, it's a court martial offense.FBI monitored social media on Election Day for 'fake news' about Hillary Clinton: Report
So who gave the order? And did this really happen?Venezuela says crushes anti-government attack on military base
BOM scandal: “smart cards” filter out coldest temperatures. Full audit needed ASAP!
Australia's Bureau of Meteorology apparently gooses the numbers before they become Official™.Immigration Brings Out the Social Engineers
“If we Americans value freedom, we will dismiss the social engineers, open the borders, and liberate ourselves.”Republican Shadow Campaign for 2020 Takes Shape as Trump Doubts Grow
I don't think it will happen, but you can practically feel the NY Times droolDunkirk: A contrary view about a movie everyone else loves
Something I never considered but well worth thinking about.U.S. job growth surges in July
I'm not sure the growth is stable, but yes, the numbers did surge. And yes, Obama would have killed for those numbers.1.8 million California acres were set aside for frogs.
Environmentalism is a crusade, ecology is a science studying interconnections and tradeoffs.
“The War On Cars”
“There is a war against cars in America. Regulators want Americans out of cars and onto trains, buses, and bicycles. Why? Because of what cars represent -- freedom. Automotive expert Lauren Fix ("The Car Coach") explains.”
Read More...Tuesday roundup
What Obama did
America's Media Meltdown
❝❝In the 2008 campaign, reporters ignored the close and disturbing relationships between the mostly unknown Obama and a cast of unsavory characters: his racist and anti-Semitic pastor Rev. Jeremiah Wright, the neighborhood confidant and former terrorist Bill Ayers, and the wheeler-dealer and soon-to-be felon Tony Rezko.
Instead, journalists quickly started worshipping candidate Obama in a manner never quite seen before, not even in the days of the iconic liberal presidents like Franklin Delano Roosevelt and John F. Kennedy. Newsweek editor Evan Thomas declared Obama to be a deity (“Obama's standing above the country, above the world, he’s sort of God.”) His very words were able to make the leg of MSNBC’s Chris Matthews “tingle.” His pants’ crease proved for David Brooks a talisman of his future greatness, along with the fact that the mellifluent Obama “talks like us.”
While a few journalists were aware of their cult-like worship, most were hooked and competed to outdo one another with embarrassing hagiographic praise. Upon election, Obama was summarily declared by one presidential historian and television pundit to the smartest man with the highest IQ ever to have been president.
Obama himself channeled the veneration, variously promising in god-like fashion to cool the planet and lower the seas, remarking that his own multifaceted expertise was greater than that of all of the various specialists who ran his campaign. For the next eight years, the media largely ignored what might charitably be called an historic overextension of presidential power and scandal not seen since the days of Richard Nixon’s presidency. A clique of journalists set up a private chat group, JournoList, through which they could channel ideas to promote the Obama progressive agenda.❞❞
— Victor Davis Hanson
Why the site changes?
This blog will run Monday through Friday. For a while at least, on Mondays I'll publish my crux files. Wednesdays I will publish a weekly original article. Thursdays I'll publish the American classics. I'll put up news clippings as I run across them. I'll put up NeoNotes entries as I have them ready. Expect a headline roundup every weekday. And quotes. Many, many quotes.
Read More...NeoNotes — government requires
❝❝There's a very real question why there should be any government grants, but I will leave that for another time.NeoNotes are the selected comments that I made on other boards, in email, or in response to articles where I could not respond directly.
Assume for a moment that you ran a bookstore. Should you be required by law to carry the Bible even though you were not Christian and did not believe Christianity was a valid faith? What if someone complained because you didn't have it?
Should a vegan restaurant be required to sell pulled pork BBQ?
Should a health food store be required to sell pipe tobacco?
Except we know that government does mandate that some products and services be sold or provided.
Let's take another example or two, shall we?
Imagine you are a lawyer or accountant. You know a specific businessman is crooked and can't be trusted. Should you be required to provided services?
Imagine you are an employer. Should you be required to verify the immigration status of each of your employees?
Most importantly, why should prior marginalization get a higher priority when it comes to the rule of law? Doesn't that lead to abuse of it's own when the formerly victimized class games the system?
Ah, so you are going to stick to "class of people." That's the problem. People aren't their labels. Or at least they shouldn't be.
Someone doesn't have higher moral authority because their group has been marginalized in the past.
And just in case you hadn't noticed, "American identity politics" is all about oppressing everyone else. All of which is predicated on the guilt of the former oppressor.
Black Lives Matter. All too ready to go after "white" cops, but doesn't want to address the problem of "black on black" crime. Nor does it want to address the major underlying problem, single parent families. Something that was encouraged by government, effectively relegating inner city families to poverty. Nor do they accept any criticism of their movement.
Much of third and fourth wave feminism. Apparently feminism is no longer about equality, it's about forcing men to sit down and shut up. And if a man complains, he's accused of rape.
The recent kerfuffle over the "redesigned" rainbow flag that put black and brown stripes at the top so that "people of color" had "representation." Literally "my victimhood is more important than your victimhood."
Identity politics is built on a carefully maintained hierarchy of victimhood. You're not allowed to speak unless you rank high enough with your victimhood or have demonstrated sufficient "compassion," usually by drawing attention to the "problem." But never actually solving anything.
And you are not allowed to question the victimhood.
Stop.
Step back. You are excusing their behavior.
Look at what has been done, not at the justifications.
Look at what is allowed within the groups.
Your enabling is just one example of what has locked people into their victimhood.
What you've given is excuses why people can't be held accountable.
Black Lives Matter is pushing a narrative that all police interactions with minorities but especially with "blacks" are racist. That's not true. And as I said, they overlook "black" on "black" crime that does not fit with the narrative.
It's victimhood I don't like, especially when perpetuated by bad government policy and "community outreach" that exploits the victims by keeping them victims.
And the courts were wrong.
Not because interracial marriages were wrong (they aren't). But because government can't be trusted to make individual moral decisions for you.
If you didn't choose your morality and if you do not commit to your morality, is it really yours?
Or did it just get sacrificed for the greater good?
Remember, most of the complaints against the current President are because he is doing the wrong moral things. Or at least, according to some people. Such as pulling out of the Paris accord.
Frankly there are people I want to discriminate against. There are evangelical Christians I want nothing to do with. There are radical feminists that I also don't want anything to do with. My list also includes some of the climate alarmists, the man-boy love crowd, anyone associated with a child beauty pageant, the extra-devout followers of Silver Ravenwolf, pretty much any organized political party, and a few dozen others.
Should government protect those people from my discrimination?
Actually we don't know that pulling out of the Paris accord is dangerous for the planet.
Here's what we do know. The "debate" about climate change has been heavily weighed on one side. A recent study has some of the most prominent climate alarmists admitting that the predictions didn't match the reality. President Obama committed the US, but the G20 and Obama didn't call it a treaty so it wouldn't have to go to the US Senate for approval. These aren't exactly moral actions.
Commerce is based on voluntary economic transactions between consenting adults. There's no “public service” about it. A company improves it's product or service (and lowers the price) because it wants to keep business from the competition. The "moral good" is based on pure greed. Nothing government demands from a business won't impose greater costs on the customer. Government relies on force. When government acts against people, it distorts the economy and morality.
It's not about public service, and commerce shouldn't answer to corrupt politicos.
The data was fudged. The people who fudged it knew it. The people who sought to make it a political issue beyond the control of any single government knew it.
If it's not about "saving the planet," then you have to ask what it is about. Especially when there is an everchanging deadline and No One Is Allowed To Question the failed predictions.
The entire movement is built on computer models, not science. I can't emphasize that enough. Models, not science. If the models have bad assumptions and/or if the data has been changed, the models aren't accurate.
But, "the science is settled." So you aren't allowed to dissent. You wouldn't accept that from a Creationist, why accept it from people who benefit financially and politically from forcing their agenda?
That wasn't what I said.
The models haven't been accurate in more than a dozen years. Even before that, the models had to be "goosed" to show a link between the past and the present.
I've said before that I can create a spreadsheet that makes me a millionaire in a week. That doesn't mean that the spreadsheet is accurate. And it sure doesn't mean I should wave cash around.
If the model isn't accurate, if we know it's not accurate, and if the people pushing the model hardest know that it's not accurate, don't you think it's time to ask why we should use the model?
No, that is what you have been told that the model is.
I strongly urge you to take a closer look. And I would remind you that there is no science in history that has ever been considered holy writ and beyond criticism.
For example, if I wanted to know the average global temperature right now this very minute, I'd have to accept that most land based measuring stations are in developed areas, many in highly urban areas that influence the readings. Satillite measurements are better, but don't go back further than about sixty years. And most of the ocean is a mystery below a mile deep.
So what exactly is the global average temperature?
I'm not shy about it. I don't approve of their life choices. I especially don't approve when *insert group name here* demands that it is not enough for to acknowledge their words and actions, it must be celebrated as the only accepted truth.
I don't want them on the ballot. I don't want to do business with them. I don't want them in my town.
And I think they are corrupting society.
Again, should government protect them from my discrimination?
I may not be a pure libertarian when it comes to the Zero Aggression Principle, but I don't usually initiate force. It's sloppy and takes too much energy.
“How many NAMBLA neighbors do you have, anyway?”
One.
Once.
I've been a corporate VP and I've run my own business.
Can you point to the spot in the Constitution where it defines the powers of the Federal government to control who I can and can't do business with? How about the spot where it defines that I must do business with everyone who wants to do business with me? Because under the Tenth Amendment, there isn't one.
If government isn't defending my ability to choose as long as I accept the consequences, then government has failed.
Even if my neighbors don't approve of my choice.
Especially if my neighbors don't approve of my choice.
If I am not free to discriminate as I choose, then government is discriminating against me. And that is what we see now. Some choices are more equal than others.
Not really.
That clause is the most abused in the Constitution, largely because it does not place significant restrictions on the Federal government. By some interpretations, the government can do what it wants when it wants and despite what people want. When you consider that everything from FDA approval to requiring transgender bathrooms is shoved through that loophole, it's a wonder that there is anything left of the rest of the Constitution.
Even in your flawed interpretation, public accommodation only applies in certain cases. Some are more victimized than others, remember?
Volumes have also been written against it. For generations in fact, right back to to the Anti-Federalist Papers
And then there is always the practical common sense approach. Here's the clause straight from Article 1 Section 8.
“To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes;”
I can tell you know many Diné, Hopi, Havasupai, and White Mountain Apache who think that "Great White Father speaks with forked tongue." Just look at what the Interior Department did when it came to mineral rights.
You've tried to tell me what the consensus says, but you haven't disputed my conclusions. The commerce clause has been used to expand Federal power far beyond the scope of the rest of the Constitution. The only other comparable Federal power grab in American history has been the USA PATRIOT Act and the open-ended declaration of hostilities that happened after 9-11.
Or we could just stop handing out government grants and do something radically different like lower taxes, reduce government spending, and let people decide what to do with their own money.
Church playgrounds aren't national religious issues unless government is funding them.
The First Amendment is very clear: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof…”
Neither help nor hinder. It's the only way to win this particular battle. Otherwise you have things like a Faith Based Initiative (for certain faiths approved by law) and school prayer.
I think we do. And it's right there in the First Amendment.
Don't.
If there is one thing worse than a politico wrapping themselves in the flag, it's a politico standing on religion wrapping themselves in a flag.❞❞
“American Pravda”
“Project Veritas' new video showing CNN Producer John Bonifield admitting that CNN's Russia narrative is "bullsh*t" and all about ratings”
Read More...☆ Government should be governed
Government exists for one reason and one reason only. Government exists to protect freedom. Not to govern, but to protect.
That's a different way of looking at things, isn't it?
Take education. There is not one blessed thing in the Constitution about the Federal government controlling or influencing education. Which means under the Tenth Admendment, it isn't allowed to do so.
Marriage? Not one thing.
Approving of medicines and medical devices? Not one thing.
Yet our legislatures and our President think that it is within government's power.
There were 115 Public Laws passed by Congress in 2016. Do you know what they are? I don't. And by the way, "Ignorance of the law is no excuse."
I know that under Obama, there were more than 21,000 regulations added to the Federal Register. That's not pages, that's actual regulations. I don't know what more than a fraction of those are.
Do you think we might have just a little bit too much government?
According to politicos, every problem has a government solution. Including the problems caused by government. Yes, the Official® Solution to government power is More Government. More law! More rules! More technocrats!
Less liberty.
That's how it really works. Every time government acts, you are less free. Every time that government acts, it costs you money. Every time that government acts, government grows.
Every time. Every single time.
And when someone comes along and says government should be smaller, why, that is a Threat to the American Way of Life!
Except, when did more government become the American Way of Life?
Shouldn't we have smaller government?
Shouldn't we have more freedom?
Shouldn't we have more personal responsibility?
Your choice.
☆ Media utopia
It wouldn't be every story. But it would be the big stories, the ones that everyone would be talking about. So if you wanted to stay ahead of the curve, you'd read those three papers every day you could. The three papers were The New York Times, the Washington Post, and the Wall Street Journal. Oh, The Economist was good too, but I couldn't always find that.
These papers set the agenda that the rest of the nation's press followed. Not always the opinion, but definitely Which Stories Were Worthy. Even newsweeklies and the television news magazines followed the stories that these three newspapers had pointed out.
Telling people what has happened, that's reporting. But the best reporters went beyond that, they put it into context. If the President rapped his knuckles on the desk, they'd tell you what his predecessors did, when, and why. You'd understood how it fit.
There never was journalistic objectivity, but that was okay. As long as some differing opinions made it to press, the public would learn what happened. Reporting was the priority.
Over the years, the Washington Post grew convinced that it had taken down a President. Maybe setting the agenda wasn't enough. Maybe they could shape world events with their reporting. If they said it happened, maybe enough people would believe and the Elected Leadership would react. It worked kinda-sorta with Ronald Reagan, and it worked well with George H. W. Bush.
Then came Bill Clinton who wanted to change the world. So he cultivated and seduced the press. He convinced them that his administration together with the press could change the world if they only tried hard enough. And before the press admitted that there were all sorts of juicy tidbits in Clinton's background, it worked out pretty well. It also cemented belief that the press had a Higher Calling, and it was up to them to turn ignorance into enlightenment.
After Billy-boy came George W. Bush, Bush the Younger. Or Bush League as I eventually called him. Bush the Younger would have been a tolerable President, but then we had 9-11. And the press didn't want a war. Or at least, they didn't want an Official War® with heroes and patriotism and Amazing America riding to the rescue. So they decided to control the agenda. Most of the heroism coming out of 9-11 and the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan never made the headlines. The failures, real and imagined, did.
Yeah, about that imagined bit. It was the Higher Calling. American ideas couldn't be allowed to succeed, especially on a world stage. America had to have more failures if only because America had more success. For most of his administration, George W. Bush could do no right according to the popular press.
And then came Barack Obama, the Imperious Leader, He Who Could Do No Wrong. The press loved this guy. For the first time ever, a president mostly played along with what the press said. The press didn't have to report it, they could create reality. That's what happened for eight years.
By 2016, the press had forgotten that their primary job was reporting what happened. No one realized that while the Grand Vision was put in place, they were losing Democrat lawmakers and elected officials to keep it into place. Meanwhile many people resented being dragged into a Utopia without their consent. Especially when Utopia was more expensive and more tyrannical.
So Donald Trump happened.
The press completely missed it. What happened wasn't nearly as important as what was supposed to happen.
The truth was a prison. The answer was to do what had worked for eight marvelous years. Reality had to change. Legality didn't matter. Morality didn't matter. Only the Utopia.
The untruths came fast. No one was going on record but it was obvious that Trump would fail if he got pushed. He couldn't hope to succeed. So stories of high-level meetings that never happened came out. Stories about sex orgies and golden showers in Russia. Stories about Trump hoarding the White House ice cream. None of these stories could be verified. The answer was to accelerate the news cycle. That was easy enough with the internet. Literally hours after each story was released came the debunking, new stories followed minutes after that.
We've reached the point where most of the “news” about President Donald Trump and his administration can't be trusted. The newspapers and news sources I used to trust can't be trusted.
I hate admitting it, but Trump is right about the press. And it's because the press won't report the news. The press wants the Utopia.
Truth doesn't matter.
Headline roundup
Net Neutrality Supporters Want to ‘Ban Drudge’
One of my maxims applies here. “Ever notice that when someone starts talking about the common good, they try to take something away from you?”Judge: Lois Lerner’s tea party-targeting testimony can stay secret — for now
So what are they hiding?How Team Obama tried to hack the election
We know it happened. Why isn't it being investigated?Inside Obama’s Secret Outreach to Russia
Again, we know it happened. Why isn't it being investigated?Get Congress Back to Legislating, Not Just Budgeting
Another example of unintended consequences.CNN’s Kathy Griffin and the Face of Tolerant Democrats
Griffin doesn't want to face the consequences.Flashback: Obama Admin. Offers to Share Syria Intel on Terrorists With Russia
Yep. We know it happened. Why isn't it being investigated?Friday roundup
Illegal spying on legal phone calls
“Former US Attorney: Susan Rice Ordeblurb Spy Agencies To Produce ‘Detailed Spreadsheets’ Involving Trump”
Read More...Follow that trail
““There is no evidence of any wrongdoing by President Trump.
But plenty of evidence points to Barack Obama's abuse of power. Let us follow that trail.””
— Don Sruber, Investigate Obamagate