Wednesday roundup
Civility 101: James Cromwell Says ‘There Will Be Blood’ if Dems Lose Midterms
If this is true, why hold elections?State-Backed Digital Currency Offers Nothing for Canadians
Is This Worse Than '68?
Moving The Goalposts: IPCC Secretly Redefines what ‘Climate’ means
Bolsonaro is not a fascist
Dad at McDonald's with kids shoots and kills masked gunman who opened fire
Why Halloween Is America’s Most Neighborhood-Nurturing Holiday
Hillary Clinton Drops Super Racist Comment During Event
Can you imagine any Republican getting away with this?The Misguided Rabbis of Twitter
“Calls to excommunicate pro-Trump Jews are not simply wrong. They’re poison.”Election predictions
Why polls probably aren't workingFeds Order Google To Hand Over A Load Of Innocent Americans' Locations
Not guilty, just in the wrong place at the wrong time. So much for the "right" of privacy.New Research Confirms We Got Cholesterol All Wrong
“The U.S. government has pushed a lot of bad nutrition advice over the years. Maybe it should stop advising us on what to eat.”Warmists and Skeptics Should Agree That This is The Real Scandal in Climate Science
Government is a non-producer
““Government is a non-producer; like any parasite it is wholly dependent on its host for sustenance. And so the only way it can accomplish anything is to force others to do it by the threat of violence.””
— Maggie McNeill, The Gun in the Room
That's dependency
““Freedom is not empowerment. Empowerment is what the Serbs have in Bosnia. Anybody can grab a gun and be empowered. It's not entitlement. An entitlement is what people on welfare get, and how free are they? It's not an endlessly expanding list of rights -- the "right" to education, the "right" to food and housing. That's not freedom, that's dependency. Those aren't rights, those are the rations of slavery -- hay and a barn for human cattle. There is only one basic human right, the right to do as you damn well please. And with it comes the only basic human duty, the duty to take the consequences.””Read More...
NeoNotes — Let people make their own choices
❝❝There comes a time when the only way to win is not to play.NeoNotes are the selected comments that I made on other boards, in email, or in response to articles where I could not respond directly.
Just pointing out again that if you don't like government power, maybe the real answer is taking the power away from government.
At that point I'd have to stand and say no.
You can't exile someone because of what they believe. It's what they want to do to you. That doesn't make it right.
We need to have our ideas challenged by people we don't agree with. If the ideas are good, they will stand on their own merit.
Maybe it's time the libertarians (small l, not the party) were in charge. We could start by abolishing any political party, reducing the total amount of taxes to ten percent and making the politicos pay for anything government spends above that amount.
Then we can talk about who is allowed to have influence.
And organizing everything from the words anyone is allowed to say to the calorie count of a pizza slice, just how well is that working out?
The problem isn't who is calling the shots. Experience has shown that no matter what promises someone makes, as soon as they have power they will be just as tyrannical as the opposition. Look at this discussion. You are literally writing about who is and is not allowed to have influence. And making sure that capital L Libertarians are on display, but not allowed to influence policy. That's better for people how? We are supposed to trust in the benevolence of conservatives?
The answer is massively reducing the size and scope of government. Let people make their own choices.
Can you do that without pointing a gun at people?
Do you have enough courage in your convictions to do it without force?
And I am not convinced that conservatives can be totally trusted. As I rule, I trust conservatives more than I do progressives, but I don't trust you that much.
It's not easy to do it without a gun, but it's possible. The thing is, progressives don't start with guns. They start by establishing Moral Authority. You can do more by taking that away than you can with guns. Hurting them or killing them just makes martyrs to the "cause."
The Left doesn't like it when I do a lot of things. That doesn't stop me much.❞❞
Point a gun
““Hello, everyone. Guess who. Please, point a gun at me if it helps you relax.””
— The Doctor, A Good Man Goes to War
☆ Our permission society
““Everything not forbidden is compulsory.””
— T. H. White, The Once and Future King
Today I want to recognize two societies, the liberty society and the permission society.
The liberty society assumes that people take responsibility for their choices. Unless it harms someone or their property, you are free to do what you choose, when you choose, and how you choose. You choose.
But you are responsible for the consequences.
The permission society forbids people from acting without permission. Or license. Or approval.
Sadly, America has moved well into being a permission society. And our politicos want to move us further.
Your income must be reported under penalty of law. Spend too much, and it is reported. Save too much and it is reported. Take it out in cash and cross state lines and it is confiscated.
You're free to take what drugs you need as long as you have a doctor's permission. Except some drugs can't be legally sold. And some you must sign for because government assumes you might be making other not so legal drugs.
You can buy alcoholic beverages usually. But some states require that you buy from the government. And some wines and beers can't be sold across state lines.
You can buy insurance if your state government has approved the policy in advance. Don't like what's offered in your state? Sorry, you don't have permission to buy anything else.
You can carry a gun or not as your state decides. You might or might not need a license. You might or might not be able to carry a concealed weapon. Oh, and just because you can do it in your state doesn't mean you can do it in another.
You can start your own business. If you get the proper permits and occupational licensing. And sometimes, if your would be competition doesn't object.
You can rent out your house. If the local hotels and motels don't raise a fuss.
You can use your car to drive people. As long as you don't charge them if you don't have a taxi medallion.
How is this freedom?
Where is the harm?
Why do you stand for this?