Thursday - 09May2019 Filed in:
Ecology&Quotes & Thinkums❝❝Since ethanol is heavily subsidized in the United States, the price at the pump does not reflect the actual cost to produce. Extra costs are buried in taxes and the Federal general fund. These costs include collecting the tax, administering the tax, administrating the production and distribution of ethanol, and actual subsidies. It's nearly impossible to accurately calculate these costs, much less contain them.
Even with substantial subsidies, the technology doesn't exist to make ethanol economically from anything except food crops. Theoretically, almost any plant material can be used. Practically we haven't reached that point yet.
Government mandates and artificial demands for ethanol raise global food costs. The more crops required for ethanol, the bigger demand on food crops. The more ethanol that is required by law, the less food the poor can afford.
Mixing ethanol with gasoline makes fuel with less energy. More fuel must be used to move the same distance. There is ever growing political pressure to increase the ethanol and decrease the gasoline in the mix, which means even more fuel is needed.
Ethanol does not burn "cleaner" than gasoline. Ethanol does produce fewer greenhouse gases, but science hasn't yet found significant evidence that human-caused greenhouse gases significantly change the climate.
Ethanol is much more chemically reactive. Special (expensive) measures must be taken to transport and store ethanol. It doesn't "keep" as well as gasoline.
Farming crops to produce a gallon of ethanol takes more than a gallon of gasoline, especially considering the soil additives needed.❞❞
Tags: maxims ∙ ethanol ∙ United States ∙ price ∙ costs ∙ tax ∙ subsidies ∙ mandates ∙ food crops ∙ cleaner ∙ greenhouse gases ∙ climate ∙ chemically reactive ∙ gasoline
Monday - 10Jul2017 Filed in:
Ecology“July 4, 2017 : Coldest July Temperature Ever Recorded In The Northern Hemisphere”
“Study Finds Temperature Adjustments Account For ‘Nearly All Of The Warming’ In Climate Data”
“Groups see climate science review as chance to undercut regulation”
“Since 2014, 400 Scientific Papers Affirm A Strong Sun-Climate Link”
“New Insights on the Physical Nature of the Atmospheric Greenhouse Effect Deduced from an Empirical Planetary Temperature Model”
Read More...Tags: clipping ∙ Valerie Volcovici ∙ Micheal Bastach ∙ climate ∙ climate change ∙ global surface temperature ∙ NASA ∙ NOAA ∙ UK’s Met Office ∙ skeptics ∙ warming trend ∙ EPA ∙ Myron Ebell ∙ Competitive Enterprise Institute ∙ Supreme Court ∙ Clean Air Act ∙ greenhouse gases ∙ Scott Pruitt ∙ Ned Nikolova ∙ Karl Zellerb