Saturday - 19Jan2019 Filed in:
NeoNotes&Law&Morality & Modern Life
Saturday - 23Jun2018 Filed in:
Quotes & Thinkums&Law&Liberty““Government has three primary functions. It should provide for military defense of the nation. It should enforce contracts between individuals. It should protect citizens from crimes against themselves or their property. When government-- in pursuit of good intentions tries to rearrange the economy, legislate morality, or help special interests, the cost come in inefficiency, lack of motivation, and loss of freedom. Government should be a referee, not an active player.””
— Milton Friedman
Tags: Milton Friedman ∙ goverment ∙ military ∙ contract law ∙ mala in se ∙ good intentions ∙ morality ∙ special interests ∙ inefficiency ∙ motivation ∙ freedom ∙ referee
Under what circumstances does the state or the people have the moral authority to compel someone to act against their beliefs?
Read More...Tags: kosher ∙ pork ∙ BBQ ∙ equality ∙ past wrongs ∙ equal rights ∙ granting privilege ∙ denying rights ∙ moral authority ∙ freedom ∙ Eric July ∙ discriminate ∙ mala in se ∙ mala prohibita ∙ goverment
Saturday - 05May2018 Filed in:
Quotes & Thinkums❝❝Bad in and of itself. Something is mala in se if and only if it threatens or results in measurable damage to life, liberty, and property. Murder, violent attacks, rape, kidnapping, and theft are included. The key concept here is "measurable damage."❞❞
— NeoWayland, mala in se
Tags: maxims ∙ lexicon ∙ mala in se
No one person and no one group has all the answers. No one group should be vested with THE moral authority to decide who is and is not a hate group.
The SPLC needs competition.
Read More...Tags: Southern Poverty Law Center ∙ hate groups ∙ competition ∙ religion ∙ authority ∙ FedGovs ∙ press ∙ conservative ∙ libertarian ∙ KKK ∙ Nation of Islam ∙ pro-life Christian ministries ∙ militias ∙ hate crime ∙ mala in se ∙ mala prohibita ∙ Mark Potok ∙ hypocrites
Saturday - 02Dec2017 Filed in:
NeoNotes&Law&Liberty❝❝There are two assumptions implicit in public accommodation laws. First is that there is a class of people who no matter what can never ever do things on their own. Second is that most people no matter what can never ever be trusted to do the right thing.
I think both assumptions are wrong.
Good law has been used for bad purposes since someone bothered to write down the law. The question you should ask is which is more important, freedom or misuse of the law?
It's my old friend, the parity test. If Christians can be barred from living their faith, what's to stop pagans from being barred from living theirs? Or atheists, Muslims, Buddhists, or any of a thousand others?
Just because someone does something you don't like doesn't mean that it should be illegal and that someone should be punished for it. I'd say that the guideline should be measurable harm to someone's person, liberty, and property. Hurting your feelings shouldn't qualify. I deal with the difference between mala in se and mala prohibita laws at my politics blog at www DOT paganvigil DOT com SLASH files SLASH RootsGovPower061204 DOT html.
Incidentally, the right of free association was one of the "understood" rights covered by the Tenth Amendment. After all, the U.S. had just fought a war over it.
Up until that time, it was one of the biggest wars about non-association ever fought.
Freedoms seldom clash with each other. Someone wanting to control others through religion isn't freedom, it's politics. Knowing the difference can be helpful.
I'm not responsible for how someone feels, especially since both the feelings and the standards used to justify those feelings change often. Measurable harm to someone's person, property, and liberty is one of the few objective standards we can agree on. A microaggression is what the victim says it is, and some things become microaggressions that weren't last week. It's privilege. I don't have time or energy to indulge it anymore.❞❞
NeoNotes are the selected comments that I made on other boards, in email, or in response to articles where I could not respond directly.
Tags: freedom ∙ misuse of law ∙ parity test ∙ measurable harm ∙ mala in se ∙ mala prohibita ∙ Tenth Amendment ∙ microaggression ∙ victim ∙ privilege
❝❝Mala in se means "bad in and of itself." Something is mala in se if and only if it threatens or results in measurable damage to life, liberty, and property. Mala prohibita means "bad because it is prohibited." Something is mala prohibita if and only if the state has forbidden it. I would add regulation as well.
To prove mala in se, you have to show measurable damage. Mala prohibita means that the government will impose morality and ethics by force.❞❞
— NeoWayland, United We Stand - Dragging religion into politics
Tags: damage ∙ forbidden ∙ maxims ∙ mala in se ∙ mala prohibita
Saturday - 25Nov2017 Filed in:
Quotes & Thinkums❝❝We can agree on the mala in se but we can't agree on the mala prohibita.❞❞
— NeoWayland, United We Stand - Dragging religion into politics
Tags: maxims ∙ agree ∙ mala in se ∙ mala prohibita
Saturday - 01Apr2017 Filed in:
NeoNotes&Morality & Modern Life&Law
Friday - 31Mar2017 Filed in:
Morality & Modern Life&LawI don't think there are minority rights. I believe we have human rights and that it's not a right unless the other guy has it too. Which other guy? All other humans. At least all other humans in our culture and our society.
Read More...Tags: rights ∙ minority rights ∙ Decalogue ∙ mala in se ∙ mala prohibita ∙ public meetings ∙ pagan symbols and rites ∙ public eye ∙ locked doors ∙ privacy fences ∙ illegal behavior ∙ societal repression ∙ personal discipline ∙ morality ∙ ethics ∙ civil rights laws ∙ dominist ∙ favorites
Sunday - 09Dec2007 Filed in:
Morality & Modern Life&Politics
Roots of government power
Monday - 04Dec2006 Filed in:
Morality & Modern Life&FAQsWhich laws are necessary and which ones are wasteful? Here is what you can count on a libertarian to say.
Read More...Tags: Original Vigil ∙ mala in se ∙ mala prohibita ∙ forbidden