NeoNote — Pandering
❝❝Since the last time I read your stuff, I've been racking my brain to remember any libertarians who "pandered" to pedophiles. I can't remember any. "Consenting adults" is a big priority.NeoNotes are the selected comments that I made on other boards, in email, or in response to articles where I could not respond directly.
As for "pandering" to homosexuals, well, we also "pander" to Jews, women, Rotarians, Red Sox fans, and classic car owners. Not to mention people with piercings, people with tattoos, people with nine toes, and almost anyone else you can name.
If you're threatened by "live and let live," by all means run away.
These are two different issues. The only one that I'm denying is that libertarians pander to pedophiles.
You want to use it as the modern political equivalent of blood libel.
It's probably because I am pagan, but I've found keeping minors at an arm's length when it comes to religion and sexuality solves more problems than it causes. It's one of those necessary compromises that keeps neighbors.
I think you'll find that most small "l" libertarians like me consider it a minor issue, if at all.
I will point out that the laws are not self consistent. Driving at 16 (some farm states allowed it at 14 in rural areas), voting and draft eligibility at 18, drinking age of 21, well, those are just some of the best known examples.
I've pointed out before that the whole extended childhood thing is mostly a post WWII American urban phenomena. Attitudes towards "child brides" were very different a few generations ago.
Can you tell me what the "American" position is on taxes? Does every single American agree with that? What about public schools? And immigration?
I call myself libertarian with a small "l" because when I say "classic liberal" most folks in the U.S. don't know what I am talking about. It has nothing to do with a political party and everything to do with liberty.
I believe that the freedom to choose is the mark of an adult human. Make of that what you will.
Classic liberalism predates the founding of the American republic. That is why I distinguish between "Libertarianism" and "libertarianism." Big "L" versus small "l." Party platform versus individual responsibility.
If you'll look closely at what I've written, I've always stressed "consenting adults" when it comes to sexual practices.
I pointed out that even the All Wise Forces of Government & Society® can't decide when a child is responsible or not.❞❞
Modern liberals are not the same as classic liberals
This is a page from the original version of Pagan Vigil. There are some formatting differences. Originally published at www.paganvigil.com/C322448388/E1545986641
A pet peeve
Modern liberalism depends on an ever increasing government intervention to control economic activity an channel it towards worthy ends.
The two have nothing to do with one another, even though modern liberalism claims descent from classic liberalism by way of social democracy.
From my viewpoint, modern liberalism is trying to cash in on the reputation of classic liberalism in order to justify their actions, even though those same actions violate both the spirit and letter of classic liberalism
Posted: Tue - August 9, 2005 at 07:18 AM