Telecom companies want Federally enforced monopoly over contentTaking away net neutrality and turning
the internet commons into private property
I haven't talked much about COPE, otherwise known
as the Communications, Opportunity, Promotion, and Enhancement
Act.
The major telecommunications companies want monopoly power over the internet. It takes government action for any company to gain a monopoly. Right now the ISP companies control bandwidth, but not content. If you pay for a dial up connection, you have a slower connection than high-speed, but from your viewpoint it takes about the same time to connect to Google as it does the New York Times. The ISPs want the power to charge for the amount of bandwidth that is used, and rather than going after you, they want to hit the content providers. So for example a company that provides video clips would have to pay a premium to the ISPs for the end user (that's you) to get the content at the best speed, or even at all. If this passes, expect a lot of the "free content" to vanish from the web because it will be sent to the slow lane or blocked entirely. The problem is that the internet up until now has been treated as commons. If I had the money to bankroll a high speed site, then anyone with access to the internet should be able to get to it at the maximum possible speed, limited only by the speed of their connection, not mine. And if an ISP doesn't approve of what I write, they shouldn't be able to block my information from their customers. Of course, this assumes I play by the rules. If I use my website to take control of someone's computer to spread spam, viruses, or trojans, yes, I should be punished and the ISP should block my access to their customers. This isn't like the grocery store, that is private property. I know that walking in, just as I know that some companies have paid to have their products places in better spots. The internet is a commons, not private property. Please notice the one thing that isn't mentioned is any suggestion that the end user (you) pay additional money if you download more. They know that their customers would complain, and rightfully so after all that advertising proclaiming "unlimited internet." So instead the ISPs want a legally enforced monopoly. And if content providers don't like it, tough. Another thing that no one is talking about is that the access fees would be passed on to you if everything you buy over the web. Here's one of the better editorials I have seen so far. Just remember, they want to take away your choice. Posted: Thu - May 11, 2006 at 04:37 AM
|
Pagan Vigil
Pagan philosopher, libertarian, and part-time trouble maker, NeoWayland watches for threats to individual freedom or personal responsiblity. There's more to life than just black and white, using only extremes just increases the problems. My Thinking Blogger Nominees
Recent
Comments Search
Categories
Guest
Articles Interested in Pagan•Vigil hosting your articles? I'm always looking for tantalizing content that makes people think. Look here for details. E Pleb Neesta AdSense
Pagan Vigil assumes no responsibility for the advertisement content provided by Google, which is neither selected nor endorsed by NeoWayland.
NeoLinks
The News Right Now Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty
Reason Magazine - Hit & Run Sunni Maravillosa and the Conspirators
Hammer of Truth Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of... Lady Liberty's Constitution Clearing House Law Enforcement Against Prohibition
no authority Center for a Stateless Society
Tammy Bruce.com Latino Issues: A Conservative Blog
The Nation
RealClimate
Papers, Please!
Letter from Hardscrabble Creek
You Are Not Alone A Big Idea from Eject! Eject! Eject! Fully Informed Jury Association World's Smallest Political Quiz Animated Introduction to the Philosophy of Liberty Institute for Liberty and Democracy
World of Ends 60 Second Refutation of Socialism, While Sitting at the Beach from Coyote Blog
World Religions - Religious Forums Ontario Consultants on Religious Tolerance
Who links to me? NeoBlogs
Books
Listmania - Liberty Basics
Legal
All Guest Articles are © copyright by their respective authors for the date given and subject to the specific restrictions and permissions as stated in that article entry. Guest Article restrictions and permissions are specific to each article and may not be applied to another Guest Article.
Views and opinions expressed in Guest Articles do not necessarily reflect those of NeoWayland. Content from other sources is quoted under the fair use laws of the United States with clear reference to the source material. Unless otherwise noted, all other content at :
www.paganvigil.com Additional Redirect/Frame pages may be found at these web addresses:
members.aol.com/ If your web browser does not show one of these addresses, then this page being used without permission of the author. The views expressed by NeoWayland are his own and do not represent any other enity. NeoWayland freely accepts individual and sole responsibility for his words and actions. XML/RSS Feeds
Statistics
|