Trials for environmental dissent?


Going after "untruths" and falsehoods

Sometimes I wonder about people. This being a classic example.

When we've finally gotten serious about global warming, when the impacts are really hitting us and we're in a full worldwide scramble to minimize the damage, we should have war crimes trials for these bastards -- some sort of climate Nuremberg.

David Roberts later showed admirable character by retracting the Nuremberg comment.

It does raise some issues though. What happens to freedom when criticism and skepticism is not allowed?

There are those who use falsehoods to deny global warming, granted.

But there are many more who use falsehoods to argue for human caused global warming.

I want debate. I want arguments. I want to see the data tested.

I do not believe that someone should get a pass just because their position is the "correct" one.

— NeoWayland

Posted: Thu - October 12, 2006 at 04:52 PM  Tag


 ◊  ◊   ◊  ◊ 

Random selections from NeoWayland's library



Pagan Vigil "Because LIBERTY demands more than just black or white"
© 2005 - 2009 All Rights Reserved