What if they gave a debate and only one side came?


Why can't Al Gore find critics of global warming when I keep tripping over them?

I had misfiled the hyperlink for this article by Joel Achenbah.

The scientists quoted are very much in your face.

The most important thing here is that these are major scientists who disagree with the entire premise of global warming, will give you why in great detail, and will not hesitate to point out the factual errors of the other side.

Here is the debate that Al Gore and others say does not exist. It looks like the debate does exist, only one side is trying very hard to pretend that it doesn't. That wouldn't be so bad, except they want to use the force of law to impose their "solutions," whether everyone agrees or not.

That is the danger.

The global warming debate needs to take place. It certainly needs to take place before we start passing laws to govern carbon dioxide emissions. And part of that debate needs to be why some people are politically discredited before the facts are examined.

— NeoWayland

Posted: Thu - July 13, 2006 at 04:31 AM  Tag


 ◊  ◊   ◊  ◊ 

Random selections from NeoWayland's library



Pagan Vigil "Because LIBERTY demands more than just black or white"
© 2005 - 2009 All Rights Reserved