Spreadin' it around


Stealing from the rich, taking a percentage off the top, and "giving" to the poor in exchange for votes
I think one of the things that annoys me most about the Presidential elections is that Democrats get away with saying things that would land Republicans in hot water.

Now this doesn't mean I support the Republican ticket. I'm the guy who thinks McCain should be arrested and tried for treason, remember? And I said that here almost two years ago.

No, the Democrats constantly undermine the rule of law and change the definitions in mid-course.

Take that notion of Obama's cutting taxes for 95% of Americans. Aside from the fact that it is not true (depends on what your definition of "tax cut" is), it violates ANY uniform rule of law.

A law must be uniformly applied to everyone. Every person HAS to be equal before the law. There can be no special considerations.

Heck, the Democrats are giving lip service to that even now as they go after the "fat cat" corporations for stealing from the American taxpayer (never mind the Congressional enablers who are playing Mafia boss with taxpayer money and "campaign contributions).

But IF the law is supposed to be uniform, why do only 95% benefit?

The answer is that it is not uniform. It's not even tax cuts. It's welfare payments, pure and simple. Social engineering to bribe more voters into choosing Democrats.

But eventually the money does run out.

— NeoWayland

Posted: Thu - October 16, 2008 at 05:29 AM  Tag


 ◊  ◊   ◊  ◊ 

Random selections from NeoWayland's library


Pagan Vigil "Because LIBERTY demands more than just black or white"
© 2005 - 2009 All Rights Reserved