This article is more than 50 years too late


Singling out Bush for blame

This article is good as far as it goes. But it's wrong to imply that this behavior started with President Bush.

Remember, this is not about whether it's right or wrong to wiretap bad guys, though the White House hopes to frame it that way for political purposes. Any rational person wants the president to be able to hunt for Qaeda suspects wherever they lurk. The "momentous" issue (Alito's words) is whether this president, or any other, has the right to tell Congress to shove it. And even if one concedes that wartime offers the president extra powers to limit liberty, what happens if the terrorist threat looks permanent? We may be scrapping our checks and balances not just for a few years (as during the Civil War), but for good.

What I want to know is why wasn't the author complaining 13 years ago when rumors started about President Clinton's abuse of power? Nixon gets blamed, but Kennedy and Johnson did it too. J. Edgar Hoover was feeding Lyndon Johnson information for years before Johnson was elected Vice-President.

Why is it so important to blame the Republicans but overlook the Democrats?

Neither party can be trusted. The more power government has, the more it will abuse and the less freedom you will have.

— NeoWayland

Posted: Mon - January 16, 2006 at 04:53 AM  Tag


 ◊  ◊   ◊  ◊ 

Random selections from NeoWayland's library



Pagan Vigil "Because LIBERTY demands more than just black or white"
© 2005 - 2009 All Rights Reserved