Since this whole mess started, there are three points that you have refused to acknowledge.

First, COVID-19 is not the sole cause or even a major cause of death,

Second, many deaths blamed on COVID-19 were never actually tested for the virus.

Third, there is a vast difference between dying with COVID-19 and dying from COVID-19.

Until and unless your copy-pasted charts acknowledge those facts, your argument is all bluster. So there is no reason for me to reply to you again on this topic on this thread.
➢ original thread

Rule of 3 № 15a - "I'm not responsible for things that happened before I was born. I'm not responsible for things that happened before I was legally of age. I'm not responsible if I didn't do it."
➢ original thread

I don't remember exactly. Probably some minor grammar or spelling correction. If I change or replace words that substantially alter the meaning, I make it a point to leave the original in a strikethrough tag. It also probably happened within the first hour or so that I posted before anyone else had answered. When I write in the early morning before my tea or hot chocolate, I often make errors. It's usually a combination of bad lighting, insomnia, and waking up.

When I can, I prefer avoiding electronics before I greet the sunrise. But when I wake up at 1 or 2 AM, often that's the biggest stretch of unscheduled discretionary time.
➢ original thread

I'd argue that the "proper" role of government is not governing. But that is a topic for another time.

In this specific case, despite all the allegations against the President, the opposing party has bent over backwards producing a nominee who certainly embodies all of those allegations. At least in spirit.

Which brings us full circle to my original point. What do you do when the candidates are unacceptable? I'm not the only one faced with that choice. The opposing party keeps acting as if the allegations against the President are true and if no major candidate from the opposing party could possibly be guilty of those terrible things. More than anything else, it looks like projection.

What's the benefit of voting for the opposing party? Especially when the Presidential nominee has spent 45+ years in D.C. without positive results except expanding government power and decreasing liberty?

Why choose him over the President?
➢ original thread

Without giving in too much to the libertarian temptation, I'll just point out that as long as people believe there is a "free" government program, they won't look for alternatives.
➢ original thread

<

blockquote>“What do you mean, why’s it got to be built? It’s a bypass. You’ve got to build bypasses.”

"Why? Has anyone considered the alternatives?" — Episode One, The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy radio series
➢ original thread

American religious liberty.

Frankly, we seem to be the only nation that gives a damn about it at all. Sometimes.
➢ original thread

Updated polygamy definition in lexicon and added references to polygyny.

Added Ides of Diana to ACT.

Edited pagan entry at lexicon.

Added feature headline to PV Watching Headlines page.

Minor rewrites and editing of sex rules lexicon entry.

Moved about box on PV blog list and PV blog post pages to right column.

Disabled PV Admin Portal blog post page title editing button. Left drop down info.