Pocketing climate change
Peer-reviewed pocket-calculator climate model exposes serious errors in complex computer models.
Like I said, it isn’t about consensus. Science is about what can be proven.
If the climate models haven’t been able to accurately predict in eighteen years, then that the models that are broken.
And if the models are wrong about results, then almost certainly the models are wrong about causes.
If the models are wrong about causes, then there is no moral need to control people for their own good.
Which makes pretty much the entire case for stopping human caused climate change extremely immoral.
It was never about saving the Earth. It was always about politics and unquestioned authority.
Like I said, it isn’t about consensus. Science is about what can be proven.
If the climate models haven’t been able to accurately predict in eighteen years, then that the models that are broken.
And if the models are wrong about results, then almost certainly the models are wrong about causes.
If the models are wrong about causes, then there is no moral need to control people for their own good.
Which makes pretty much the entire case for stopping human caused climate change extremely immoral.
It was never about saving the Earth. It was always about politics and unquestioned authority.
blog comments powered by Disqus