Catastrophe - UpdatedThe
Climategate seems to be the label that's
sticking, but my personal favorite is Warmergate.
Moving from knowns to unknowns, here's what we know. Almost all arguments for I say published because there is evidence that in the 2001 report, the published version does not agree with what the panel agreed on. There is also some evidence that support for the 2001 report as published was a major qualification for serving on the panel that produced the 2007 report. Although several institutions provided information on global warming, it's safe to say that CRU was the keystone. Over the years, CRU has avoided providing the raw data for their projections, or the methodology of how their conclusions were reached. Attempts to obtain the data through the IPCC have been stonewalled by UN officials. About two weeks ago, someone published 61 megabytes of data on a Russian server and announced it at several climate skeptic sites. Of course Russian servers are not subject to UK law and therefore no court action by the CRU could prevent access to the data. The data wasn't hacked, almost certainly it was "leaked" by an insider. The data was illegally put on the internet, but it wasn't falsified. That is important to remember. These include emails, data, and computer code. The real telling bit is a file called "HARRY_READ_Me.txt." It's very long, but there are some comments on the file here, In many cases, the original raw data doesn't even exist anymore, making any projections scientifically useless. There's little doubt that the scientists at CRU manipulated the data, gave false conclusions, and conspired to suppress dissent. Remember, this isn't all the data from CRU. But it's practically the only data that outsiders have been able to examine. Under the circumstances, ALL CRU data and projections are tainted. That's been the hardest thing for me to explain to some of my friends. "But can't they just use the good data?" "Botch after botch," the Harry file reads. There's no way to separate the good stuff from the bad. The data is toxic. The researchers are radioactive. And President Obama's science czar is up to his neck in the scandal. This isn't one instance. This is something that went on for decades, again and again and again. It wasn't just "goosing" the data, it was puree. None of the existing data or projections or climate models can be used. Ever. This isn't the climate skeptics saying this, this is because the existing data can't be verified. Certain scientists perverted science to their Cause. More on that Cause bit later. There is only one way we can discover a) if global warming exists, b) if global warming is unusual, c) if global warming is entirely or mostly human caused, and d) if global warming is bad. We have to determine those answers before we can tell e) if human action can reverse or slow global warming, and f) if humans should take action to prevent global warming. Notice that this is a progression, there's no point in dealing with e or f until we've answered a, b, c, and d in that order. And yes, four of those look very familiar for a reason. The existing data is toxic. So we need new data, new measurements. And total transparency. No secret methods. Nothing reserved for the Elect. Everything has to be open to examination. There is no other way to make sure it's valid. Yes, that should have been done in the first place. And that brings us to the Cause. Reading through the emails, it's pretty obvious that for certain scientists, Basically they believed that Most People Are Too Stupid to Make The Right Choice. Remember that, it has implications far beyond this scandal. You didn't think they had just one arrow in their quiver, do you? It's not an organized conspiracy, more of a disorganized one. What unites this cabal is the unshakable believe that People Are Too Stupid For Their Own Good. Therefore, Wise and Enlightened Leaders Must Make the Proper Choices. Or as Daniel Webster put it so well: "In every generation there are those who want to rule well - but they mean to rule. They promise to be good masters - but they mean to be masters." — Daniel Webster Yes I know I used that quote recently, but it fits. Webster certainly wasn't the only one. "The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule." — H.L. Mencken I used that one too. Here's one I haven't used recently on this blog. Okay, okay, that one is mine. It still applies though. I can honestly say that I have no idea if global warming exists, or if humanity is responsible. What I can say is that the evidence so far didn't support the conclusions. I can also say that there was a politically motivated conspiracy to keep people from questioning the global warming dogma. It's not just global warming. Apparently you are too stupid to choose your health care. Anytime an Authority Figure® tries to limit your choices, you should ask why. Free to make your own choices, that is what liberty is. Watch for this scandal to be glossed over, it's already starting. The Cause isn't global warming, it's Control. _____ Update - Regular reader BTHO pointed out on 24Feb2010 that the correct term is anthropogenic, not anthropomorphic. Posted: Mon - November 30, 2009 at 02:47 PM
|
Pagan Vigil
Pagan philosopher, libertarian, and part-time trouble maker, NeoWayland watches for threats to individual freedom or personal responsiblity. There's more to life than just black and white, using only extremes just increases the problems. My Thinking Blogger Nominees
Recent
Comments
#haloscan-recent { padding: 2px; margin: 2px; }
#haloscan-recent a { text-decoration: none; color: #333333;}
#haloscan-recent ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; overflow: hidden; margin: 0; padding: 0;}
#haloscan-recent li { text-align: justify; list-style: none; margin: 1px;}
#haloscan-recent li span.hsrname { color: #06c; font-weight: bold; }
#haloscan-recent li span.hsrmsg { font-weight: normal; }
Search
Categories
Guest
Articles Interested in Pagan•Vigil hosting your articles? I'm always looking for tantalizing content that makes people think. Look here for details. E Pleb Neesta Rebooting our System The Tax Revolt Returns AdSense
Pagan Vigil assumes no responsibility for the advertisement content provided by Google, which is neither selected nor endorsed by NeoWayland.
NeoLinks
The News Right Now Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty
Reason Magazine - Hit & Run Sunni Maravillosa and the Conspirators Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of... Lady Liberty's Constitution Clearing House Law Enforcement Against Prohibition
no authority Center for a Stateless Society
Tammy Bruce.com Latino Issues: A Conservative Blog
The Nation
RealClimate
Papers, Please!
Letter from Hardscrabble Creek
You Are Not Alone A Big Idea from Eject! Eject! Eject! Fully Informed Jury Association World's Smallest Political Quiz Animated Introduction to the Philosophy of Liberty Institute for Liberty and Democracy
World of Ends 60 Second Refutation of Socialism, While Sitting at the Beach from Coyote Blog
World Religions - Religious Forums Ontario Consultants on Religious Tolerance
Who links to me? NeoBlogs
Books
Listmania - Liberty Basics
Legal
All Guest Articles are © copyright by their respective authors for the date given and subject to the specific restrictions and permissions as stated in that article entry. Guest Article restrictions and permissions are specific to each article and may not be applied to another Guest Article.
Views and opinions expressed in Guest Articles do not necessarily reflect those of NeoWayland. Content from other sources is quoted under the fair use laws of the United States with clear reference to the source material. Unless otherwise noted, all other content at :
www.paganvigil.com If your web browser does not show one of these addresses, then this page being used without permission of the author. The views expressed by NeoWayland are his own and do not represent any other enity. NeoWayland freely accepts individual and sole responsibility for his words and actions. XML/RSS Feeds
Statistics
|